Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Bertz, R. & Johnson, L. (2000). An innovative pedagogy for teaching and evaluating computer literacy. Information Technology and Management, 4(1), 283-292.
• Desai, M. S., Richards, T. & Eddy, J. P. (2000). A field experiment: instructor-based training vs. computer-based training. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(4), 239-243.
• Dori, Y.J., & Barnea, N. (1994). In-service chemistry teachers training: The impact of inroducing computer technology on teachers attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, C.A. (ERIC Document No. ED 369646).
• Driscoll, M. P. (1993). Psychology of earning for instruction. Needham Height, MA: Ally&Bacon.
• Dusick, D. M. (1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members’ use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 123-137.
• ECDL (2001). ECDL - Computer Skills For Life. retrieved January 7, 2005 from www.ecdl.com.
• Garland, K. J., & Noyes, J. M. (2003). Computer experience: a poor predictor of computer attitudes, Computer in Human Behavior, 20, 823-840.
• Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
• Gayle, A., & Thompson, A. (1995). Analysis of the effect of networking on computer-assisted collaborative writing in a fifth grade classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 65-75.
• Geissler, J. E., & Horridge, P. (1993). University students' computer knowledge and commitment to learning, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25, 347-365.
• Gurbuz, T., Yildirim, S. I. & Ozden, M. Y. (2001). A comparison of student teachers' attitudes toward computers in on-line and traditional computer literacy courses: a case study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 29(3), 259-269.
• Kay, R. H. (1993). An exploration of theoretical and practical foundations for assessing attitudes towards computers: The computer attitude measure (CAM), Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 371-386.
• Keller, J. (1995). Motivation by design. Tallahassee, Florida: Florida State University, College of Education.
• Larkin, T. L. (2003). Learning style in the classroom: a research-guided approach. Paper presenented at the annuan conference of International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education. March 16 – 19, 2003, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
• Leigh, D. (1996). The Internet and Distributed Learning: Instructional Designer’s Medium and Tool. Available: http://mailer.fsu.edu/dleigh/superflux/words/dleigh/NetDistLearn.html
• Loyd, B. H., & Loyd, D. E. (1985). The reliability and validity of an instrument for the assessment of computer attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 903-908.
• Merchant, S., Kreie, J. & Cronan, T. P. (2001). Training end users: assessing the effectiveness of multimedia CBT. The Journal of Computer Information Systems 41(3), 20-25.
• Myers, J. L., & Well, A. D. (1995). Research design and statistical analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence and Erlboum Associates Inc.
• Pucel, D. J., & Stertz, T. F. (2005). Effectiveness of and student satisfaction with web-based compared to traditional in-service teacher education courses. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42(1), 7-23.
• Richards, T. & Eddy, J. P. (2000). A field experiment: instructor-based training vs. computer-based training. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(4), 239-243.
• Rozell, E.J., & Gardner, W.L. (1999). Computer-related success and failure: a longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(1), 1-10.
• Varank, I. (2003). The effects of computer training on Turkish teachers' attitudes toward computers and the effects of computer-supported lessons on Turkish students’reported motivation to lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

APA

Varank, İ. (2006). A Comparison of a Computer-Based and a Lecture-Based Computer Literacy Course: A Turkish Case. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75469

Vancouver

Varank İ. A Comparison of a Computer-Based and a Lecture-Based Computer Literacy Course: A Turkish Case. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2006;2(3):112-23. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75469

AMA

Varank İ. A Comparison of a Computer-Based and a Lecture-Based Computer Literacy Course: A Turkish Case. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2006;2(3), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75469

Chicago

Varank, İlhan. "A Comparison of a Computer-Based and a Lecture-Based Computer Literacy Course: A Turkish Case". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2006 2 no. 3 (2006): 112-123. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75469

Harvard

Varank, İ. (2006). A Comparison of a Computer-Based and a Lecture-Based Computer Literacy Course: A Turkish Case. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), pp. 112-123. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75469

MLA

Varank, İlhan "A Comparison of a Computer-Based and a Lecture-Based Computer Literacy Course: A Turkish Case". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 2, no. 3, 2006, pp. 112-123. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75469