Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-Group Discussion in Physics: Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N.
• Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., & Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1.
• Brown, B. B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S. D., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence. Child Development, 64(2), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131263.
• Cheng, R. W., Lam, S., & Chan, J. C. (2008). When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X218160.
• Choi, Y., & Choi, O. (2010). Analysis of the Operational Activities within the Social Enterprises Network. Korean Comparative Government Review (KCGR), 14(1). 63-76. https://doi.org/10.18397/kcgr.2010.14.1.63.
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A.
• Ernest, P. (1994). Varieties of constructivism: Their metaphors, epistemologies and pedagogical implications. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Educations, 2, 1-14.
• Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. (2009). Analyzing social media networks: Learning by doing with NodeXL. Computing, 28(4), 1-47.
• Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260608560019.
• Howe, C., Rodgers, C., & Tolmie, A. (1990). Physics in the primary school: Peer interaction and the understanding of floating and sinking. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5(4), 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173132.
• Jang, H., & Kim, Y. (2017). An analysis of effect for grouping methods corresponding to ecological niche overlap of 7th graders’ photosynthesis concepts. Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.2.195.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Oral interaction in cooperative learning groups: Speaking, listening, and the nature of statements made by high-medium, and low-achieving students. Journal of Psychology, 119(2), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1985.9915450.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. NJ: International Book Company.
• Kang, S., Kim, H., & Noh, T. (2000). Analysis of verbal interaction in small group discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(3), 353-363.
• Kim, J. (2006). Learning strategies for scientifically gifted children. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 5, 19-32.
• Kim, J., & Kim, B. (2004). The effects of group size on science process skills and attitudes toward science in middle school science class. Science Education Research Institute Korea National University of Education, 14(1), 68-82.
• Kim, M., & Kim, Y. (2015). An analysis of the verbal interaction patterns of science-gifted students in science inquiry activity. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 35(2), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0333.
• Kim, S. (2009). The effects of group size on mathematical achievement and mathematical attitude in the small group cooperative learning in mathematics classes. Unpublished Master thesis, Chungbook National University, Chungju, Korea.
• Kim, Y. (2018). Analysis of verbal interaction types and stability in science inquiry activities in 7th grade students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(6), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.6.563.
• Kim, Y., Kim, M., Ha, M., & Lim, S. (2017). Analysis of stability in verbal interaction types of science-gifted students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2441-2457. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01234a.
• Kyza, E. A., Constantinou, C. P., & Spanoudis, G. (2011). Sixth graders’ co-construction of explanations of a disturbance in an ecosystem: Exploring relationships between grouping, reflective scaffolding, and evidence-based explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2489-2525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550951.
• Lee, D. (1995). Human education and cooperative learning activity. Seoul: Sunghwasa.
• Lee, J., Kang, S., & Huh H. (2009). Establishment of teaching strategy through investigating scientific attitude, learning style, student’s preferences of teaching style and learning environments of Korea science academy students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 19(1), 141-162.
• Lee, S., & Chun, J. (2017). Analysis of argumentation on socio-scientific issue in middle school students’ small group structure based on intimacy and leadership. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(24), 343-368. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.24.343.
• Lumpe, A. T., & Staver, J. R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 71-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320108.
• Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2010). Science curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
• Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. Elementary School Journal, 94(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1086/461767.
• Palinscar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345.
• Park, S. (2006). The effects of the group reward and cooperative skill training on the science achievement and learning motivation of elementary students. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(2), 121-129.
• Slavin, R. E. (1987). Development and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 58, 1161-1167. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130612.
• Storberg-Walker, J., & Gubbins, C. (2007). Social networks as a conceptual and empirical tool to understand and “do” HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306304071.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

APA

Lim, S., Park, K.-C., Ha, M., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2019). Verbal Interaction Types in Science Inquiry Activities by Group Size. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1720. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106164

Vancouver

Lim S, Park KC, Ha M, Lee H, Kim Y. Verbal Interaction Types in Science Inquiry Activities by Group Size. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(7):em1720. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106164

AMA

Lim S, Park KC, Ha M, Lee H, Kim Y. Verbal Interaction Types in Science Inquiry Activities by Group Size. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(7), em1720. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106164

Chicago

Lim, Soomin, Kyung-Chan Park, Minsu Ha, Hyonyong Lee, and Youngshin Kim. "Verbal Interaction Types in Science Inquiry Activities by Group Size". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 7 (2019): em1720. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106164

Harvard

Lim, S., Park, K.-C., Ha, M., Lee, H., and Kim, Y. (2019). Verbal Interaction Types in Science Inquiry Activities by Group Size. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1720. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106164

MLA

Lim, Soomin et al. "Verbal Interaction Types in Science Inquiry Activities by Group Size". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 7, 2019, em1720. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106164