Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning

Zaida-Mabel Angel-Cuervo; John-Jairo Briceño-Martínez; Andrés Bernal-Ballén

doi:10.29333/ejmste/14447

Full Text (PDF)

Zaida-Mabel Angel-Cuervo ¹ ² ^* , John-Jairo Briceño-Martínez ¹ , Andrés Bernal-Ballén ¹

More Detail

¹ Facultad de Educación, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá, COLOMBIA² Secretaría de Educación Distrital Bogotá, Bogotá, COLOMBIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The study of mathematics teachers’ beliefs has become a significant research area in recent decades; however, more robust and reliable instruments are needed to assess these beliefs. This paper reports the design and validation of a multiple-choice questionnaire to assess mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning. It began with a systematic review of existing questionnaires, followed by an evaluation of the instrument’s content validity using Aiken’s V by seven expert judges. Finally, a total of 199 in-service mathematics teachers completed the instrument, demonstrating construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency. These results indicate that the instrument is reliable and valid for assessing mathematics teachers’ beliefs and identifying three teaching profiles: instrumentalists, platonists, and problem-solving.

Keywords

beliefs about mathematics
beliefs about teaching mathematics
beliefs about learning mathematics
mathematics teachers
diagnosis of beliefs

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 20, Issue 5, May 2024, Article No: em2435

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447

Publication date: 01 May 2024

Online publication date: 08 Apr 2024

Article Views: 1501

Article Downloads: 1195

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Askew, M., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Final report assessment in education special issue on “assessment and learning” view project keeping learning on track view project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258423326
Batista-Foguet, J. M., Coenders, G., & Alonso, J. (2004). Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud [Confirmatory factor analysis. Its usefulness in the validation of health-related questionnaires]. Medicina Clínica [Clinical Medicine], 122(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1157/13057542
Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 419-456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223
Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
Beswick, K. (2005). The beliefs/practice connection in broadly defined contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17, 39-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217415
Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9333-2
Beswick, K. (2019). The role of knowledge and beliefs in helping learners to progress their mathematical understanding. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(2), 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09432-5
Calleja, J. (2022). Changes in mathematics teachers’ self-reported beliefs and practices over the course of a blended continuing professional development program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 835-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00370-1
Ciftci, S. K., & Karadag, E. (2019). Analysis of mathematics teachers’ beliefs on mathematics instruction and teaching self-efficiencies within the scope of flow theory. Annales Universitates Paedagogicae Cracoviensis: Studia ad Didacticam Mathematicae Pertinentia [Annals of the Pedagogical University of Cracow: Studies on the Didactic Relevance of Mathematics], 11, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.24917/20809751.11.5
Clark, L. M., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Nishio, M., Campbell, P. F., Smith, T. M., Griffin, M. J., Rust, A. H., Conant, D. L., & Choi, Y. (2014). Teacher characteristics associated with mathematics teachers’ beliefs and awareness of their students’ mathematical dispositions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(2), 246-284. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.2.0246
Corkin, D., Ekmekci, A., & Papakonstantinou, A. (2015). Antecedents of teachers’ educational beliefs about mathematics and mathematical knowledge for teaching among in-service teachers in high poverty urban schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9), 31-62. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.3
Cupani, M., Vaiman, M., Font, M. L., Pizzichini, F., & Saretti, B. (2012). Análisis factorial confirmatorio del NEO-FFI utilizando parcelización de ítems y método bootstrap [Confirmatory factor analysis of the NEO-FFI using item parcellation and bootstrap method]. Avaliação Psicológica [Psychological Assessment], 11(2), 159-168.
Dayal, H., Cowie, B., & Bakalevu, S. (2019). Practicing secondary mathematics teachers? Beliefs about mathematics. Directions: Journal of Educational Studies, 33(1), 2-18.
Donoso, P., Rico, N., & Castro, E. (2016). Creencias y concepciones de profesores Chilenos sobre las matemáticas, su enseñanza y aprendizaje [Beliefs and conceptions of Chilean teachers about mathematics, its teaching and learning]. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado [Journal of Curriculum and Teacher Training], 20(2), 76-97. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v20i2.10409
Dorimana, A., Uworwabayeho, A., & Nizeyimana, G. (2021). Examining mathematical problem-solving beliefs among Rwandan secondary school teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(7), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.7.13
Eichler, A., & Erens, R. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs towards teaching calculus. ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 647-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0606-y
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150102
Escurra, L. (1988). Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces [Quantification of content validity by judges’ criteria]. Revista de Psicología [Psychology Magazine], 6(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.198801-02.008
Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2011). Beliefs and beyond: Hows and whys in the teaching of proof. ZDM, 43(4), 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0316-7
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
Gómez-Mejía, A. (2020). Modelo de máxima verosimilitud [Maximum likelihood model]. Libre Empresa [Free Enterprise], 17(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.18041/1657-2815/libreempresa.2020v17n2.8027
Goos, M., Ní Ríordáin, M., Faulkner, F., & Lane, C. (2021). Impact of a national professional development program for out-of-field teachers of mathematics in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 42(3), 401-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1964569
Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Torner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenuber mathematik bei mathematiklehrern [Attitudes towards mathematics among mathematics teachers]. Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik [Journal for Mathematics-Didactics], 19(1), 3-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338859
Guangbao, F., & Timothy, T. (2021). Investigating the associations of constructivist beliefs and classroom climate on teachers’ self-efficacy among Australian secondary mathematics teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626271
Herrero, J. (2010). El análisis factorial confirmatorio en el estudio de la estructura y estabilidad de los instrumentos de evaluación: Un ejemplo con el cuestionario de autoestima CA-14 [Confirmatory factor analysis in the study of the structure and stability of evaluation instruments: An example with the CA-14 self-esteem questionnaire]. Psychosocial Intervention, 19(3), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2010v19n3a9
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jordan Muiños, F. M. (2021). Valor de corte de los índices de ajuste en el análisis factorial confirmatorio [Cut-off value of fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis]. Psocial, 7(1), 66-71.
Kaplan, D. (1990). Evaluating and modifying covariance structure models: A review and recommendation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_1
Kardanova, E., Ponomaryova, A., Safuanov, I., & Osin, E. (2014). Comparative study of secondary school mathematics teachers’ beliefs and practices in Russia, Estonia and Latvia. Вопросы Образования [Education Issues], 2. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2014-2-44-81
Koklu, O., & Phan, P. (2020). Implementation of STEM in secondary mathematics classrooms: Identification of teachers’ beliefs. International Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Science, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.33642/ijhass.v5n9p1
Komorita, S. S., & Graham, W. K. (1965). Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25(4), 987-995. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446502500404
Lai, K. (2020). Fit difference between nonnested models given categorical data: Measures and estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1763802
Lerch, C. M. (2004). Control decisions and personal beliefs: Their effect on solving mathematical problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.12.002
Lévy, J. P., Varela, J., & Abad, J. (2006). Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales [Modeling with covariance structures in social sciences]. Netbiblo.
Lischka, A. E., & Garner, M. (2016). Requests for reprints should be sent to a practitioner’s instrument for measuring secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs surrounding learner-centered classroom practice. Journal of Applied Measurement, 17(2), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/t53259-000
Lloyd, M. E. R., Veal, W., & Howell, M. (2016). The use of teachers’ baseline normative beliefs to guide professional development in teaching mathematics. Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 359-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1015747
Maat, M., Zakaria, E., & Nordin, M. (2011). A confirmatory factor analysis of mathematics beliefs scale in a Malaysian context. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 5, 555-560.
Martínez Ávila, M. (2021). Análisis factorial confirmatorio: Un modelo de gestión del conocimiento en la universidad pública [Confirmatory factor analysis: A knowledge management model in the public university]. Revista Iberoamericana Para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo [Ibero-American Magazine for Educational Research and Development], 12(23). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i23.1103
Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J., & Cecchini-Estrada, J. A. (2014). Validación de la versión en Español del cuestionario de metas de amistad en educación física [Validation of the Spanish version of the friendship goals questionnaire in physical education]. Universitas Psychologica [University of Psychology], 13(1), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-1.vvec
Misfeldt, M., Thomas Jankvist, U., & Sánchez Arguilar, M. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about the discipline of mathematics and the use of technology in the classroom. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2), 395-419. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/341
Morata-Ramírez, M., Holgado-Tello, F. P., Barbero-García, I., & Mendez, G. (2015). Análisis factorial confirmatorio: Recomendaciones sobre mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en función del error tipo I de Ji-cuadrado y RMSEA [Confirmatory factor analysis: Recommendations on unweighted least squares based on type I error of Chi-square and RMSEA]. Acción Psicológica [Psychological Action], 12(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.12.1.14362
Muhtarom, M., Juniati, D., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Rahmatika, I. (2018b). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs in mathematics at State Senior High School 5 Semarang. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika [Journal of Mathematics Education Research], 5(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.18734
Mulaik, S. A., James, R. L., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
Nisbet, S., & Warren, E. (2000). Primary school teachers’ beliefs relating to mathematics, teaching and assessing mathematics and factors that influence these beliefs. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2(34-47).
Nsengimana, T., Rugema Mugabo, L., Hiroaki, O., & Nkundabakura, P. (2020). Reflection on science competence-based curriculum implementation in sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1778210
Ozturk, T., & Guven, B. (2016). Evaluating students’ beliefs in problem solving process: A case study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 411-429. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1208a
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Peña-Sarmiento, M., Avendaño-Prieto, B. L., Mejía-Vélez, S., Toro, R., & Bernal-Torres, A. (2022). Análisis empírico del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach según opciones de respuesta, muestra y observaciones atípicas [Empirical analysis of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient according to response options, sample and atypical observations]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica [Ibero-American Journal of Diagnosis and Psychological Assessment], 2(63), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP63.2.02
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 257-315). Information Age Publishing.
Pilatti, A., Godoy, J. C., & Brussino, S. A. (2012). Análisis factorial confirmatorio del cuestionario de expectativas hacia el alcohol para adolescentes (CEA-A) [Confirmatory factor analysis of the alcohol expectations questionnaire for adolescents (CEA-A)]. Acta Colombiana de Psicología [Colombian Psychology Act], 15(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1575-0973(11)70014-9
Safrudiannur, & Rott, B. (2021). Offering an approach to measure beliefs quantitatively: Capturing the influence of students’ abilities on teachers’ beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 419-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10063-z
Schoenfeld, A. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1080-9724(99)80076-7
Siswono, T. Y. E., Hartono, S., Kohar, A. W., Karim, & Kurniawan. (2019). Instrumentalist teachers’ beliefs in practicing mathematical problem solving. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12), 2851-2856. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071236
Siswono, T. Y. E., Kohar, A. W., & Hartono, S. (2016). Secondary teachers’ mathematics-related beliefs and knowledge about mathematical problem-solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012046
Soto, C. M., & Segovia, J. L. (2009). Intervalos de confianza asimétricos para el índice la validez de contenido: Un programa Visual Basic para la V de Aiken [Asymmetric confidence intervals for the content validity index: A Visual Basic program for Aiken’s V]. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 25(1), 169-171.
Šunderlík, J., & Rybanský, Ľ. (2015). Developing and piloting an instrument for measuring upper secondary mathematics teachers beliefs in Nitra Region. Acta Mathematica Nitriensia [Mathematical Journal of Nitra], 1(1), 128-134. https://doi.org/10.17846/amn.2015.1.1.128-134
Swan, M., & Swain, J. (2010). The impact of a professional development program on the practices and beliefs of numeracy teachers. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(2), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098771003695445
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1411-1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01158-6
Torres-Malca, J. R., Vera-Ponce, V. J., Zuzunaga-Montoya, F. E., Talavera, J. E., & Cruz-Vargas, J. A. (2022). Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas sobre el consumo de sal en la población Peruana [Content validity by expert judgment of an instrument to measure knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding salt consumption in the Peruvian population]. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana [Journal of the Faculty of Human Medicine], 22(2), 273-279. https://doi.org/10.25176/RFMH.v22i2.4768
Ukobizaba, F., Ndihokubwayo, K., Mukuka, A., & Uwamahoro, J. (2021). From what makes students dislike mathematics towards its effective teaching practices. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática [Bulletin: Mathematics Education Bulletin], 35, 1200-1216. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v35n70a30
Vale, C., Campbell, C., & White, P. (2021). Beliefs and practices of secondary teachers crossing subject boundaries to teach mathematics out-of-field. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00323-0
Wang, T., & Cai, J. (2007). Chinese (Mainland) teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(4), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0030-7
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Teachers’ teaching practices and beliefs regarding context-based tasks and their relation with students’ difficulties in solving these tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 637-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0157-8
Xenofontos, C. (2018). Greek-Cypriot elementary teachers’ epistemological beliefs about mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.007
Xie, S., & Cai, J. (2021b). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, learning, teaching, students, and teachers: Perspectives from Chinese high school in-service mathematics teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(4), 747-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10074-w
Zakaria, E., & Maat, S. M. (2012). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 191-194. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2012.191.194

How to cite this article

APA

Angel-Cuervo, Z.-M., Briceño-Martínez, J.-J., & Bernal-Ballén, A. (2024). Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), em2435. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447

Vancouver

Angel-Cuervo ZM, Briceño-Martínez JJ, Bernal-Ballén A. Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(5):em2435. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447

AMA

Angel-Cuervo ZM, Briceño-Martínez JJ, Bernal-Ballén A. Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(5), em2435. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447

Chicago

Angel-Cuervo, Zaida-Mabel, John-Jairo Briceño-Martínez, and Andrés Bernal-Ballén. "Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 5 (2024): em2435. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447

Harvard

Angel-Cuervo, Z.-M., Briceño-Martínez, J.-J., and Bernal-Ballén, A. (2024). Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), em2435. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447

MLA

Angel-Cuervo, Zaida-Mabel et al. "Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 5, 2024, em2435. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447