Understanding Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Processes in the Context of a Mathematical Modeling Course

Aysel Sen Zeytun; Bülent Çetinkaya; A. Kursat ERBAS

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a

Full Text (PDF)

Aysel Sen Zeytun ¹ ^* , Bülent Çetinkaya ², A. Kursat ERBAS ²

More Detail

¹ Istanbul Aydın University² Middle East Technical University^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background:
This paper investigates how prospective teachers develop mathematical models while they engage in modeling tasks.

Material and methods:
The study was conducted on an undergraduate elective course aiming to improve prospective teachers’ mathematical modeling abilities, while providing them with pedagogical knowledge for the integrating of modeling tasks into their future classroom practices. The participants of this study were six prospective teachers selected among the nineteen who enrolled in the course. Data was collected through five modeling tasks.

Results:
The results showed that the prospective teachers went through five main stages during the modeling process: understanding the task, devising a solution plan, performing the plan, interpreting and verifying the model, and presenting the model.

Conclusions:
The nature of prospective teachers’ modeling processes was rather result-oriented, consisting of a single cycle as they did not seek an improved solution by revising and refining their models.

Keywords

mathematical modeling
mathematics education
modeling process
prospective teachers

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 13, Issue 3, March 2017, 691-722

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a

Publication date: 06 Dec 2016

Article Views: 2918

Article Downloads: 3646

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Antonius, S., Haines, C., Jensen, T. H., & Burkhardt, H. (2007). Classroom activities and the teacher. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H-W. Wenn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 295–308). New York, NY: Springer.
Berry, J. (2002). Developing mathematical modelling skills: The role of CAS. ZDM– The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 34(5), 212–220.
Berry, J., & Houston, K. (1995) Mathematical modelling. Bristol, UK: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd.
Biembengut, M. S., & Faria, T. M. B. (2011). Mathematical modelling in a distance course for teachers. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo- Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 269-278). New York: Springer.
Blomhøj, M., & Kjeldsen, T. H. (2006). Teaching mathematical modelling through project work. ZDM– The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(2), 163–177.
Blum, W., Alsina, C., Biembengut, M. S., Bouleau, N., Confrey, J., Galbraith, P., Henn, H.-W. (2002) ICMI study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education – Discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1-2), 149–171.
Blum, W., & Borromeo-Ferri, R. (2009) Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45–58.
Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). Understanding how students’ and teachers deal with modelling problems. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economic- ICTMA 12 (pp. 222-231). Chichester: Horwood.
Borromeo-Ferri, R., & Blum, W. (2010). Mathematical modelling in teacher education experiences from a modelling seminar. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2046-2055). Lyon, France: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.
Borromeo-Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 38(2), 86–95.
Bracke, M., & Geiger, A. (2011). Real-world modelling in regular lessons: A long term experiment. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 529-548). New York, NY: Springer.
Bukova-Güzel, E. (2011). An examination of pre-service mathematics teachers’ approaches to construct and solve mathematical modelling problems. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 30, 19-36.
Burkhardt, H. (2011). Modelling examples and modelling projects-Overview. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 511-517). New York, NY: Springer.
Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2003). Context in application and modelling: An empirical approach. In Q. Ye, W. Blum, I. D. Huntley, & N. T. Neil (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education and culture (pp. 95- 107). Chichester: Horwood.
Carlson, M., Larsen, S., & Lesh, R. (2003). Integrating models and modelling perspective with existing research and practice. In R. Lesh, & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 465–478.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Çiltaş, A., & Işık, A. (2013). The effect of instruction through mathematical modelling on modelling skills of prospective elementary mathematics teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1187–1192.
English, L. D. (2006). Mathematical modeling in the primary school: Children’s construction of a consumer guide. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 303–323.
English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman, and L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: seeking new frontiers (pp. 263-290). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Galbraith, P. (2012). Models of modelling: Genres, purposes or perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Applications, 1(5), 3–16.
Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 38(2), 143–162.
Hodgson, T. (1997). On the use of open-ended, real-world problems. In S. K. Houston, W. Blum, I. Huntley, & N. T. Neill (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematical modelling (pp. 211-218). Chichester, UK: Albion.
Ikeda, T. (1997). Instruction and assessment of mathematical modelling. In S. K. Houston, W. Blum, I. Huntley, & N. T. Neill (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematical modelling (pp. 51-61). England, UK: Albion.
Johnson, T., & Lesh, R. (2003). A models and modelling perspective on technology based representational media. In R. Lesh, & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 265-277). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problemsolving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.
Julie, C., & Mudaly, V. (2007). Mathematical modelling of social issues in school mathematics in South Africa. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 503-510). New York, NY: Springer.
Kaiser, G. (2007). Modelling and modelling competencies in school. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modeling (ICTMA 12) Education, engineering and economic (pp. 110- 119). Chichester, UK: Horwood.
Kaiser, G., Schwarz, B., & Buchholdz, N. (2011). Authentic modelling problems in mathematics education. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 591-601). New York, NY: Springer.
Kaiser, G., Schwarz, B., & Tiedemann, S. (2010). Future teachers’ professional knowledge on modelling. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 433-444). New York, NY: Springer.
Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM– The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 302–310.
Kuntze, S. (2011). In-service and prospective teachers’ views about modelling tasks in the mathematics classroom – results of a quantitative empirical study. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri and G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 279-288). New York: Springer.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 3-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763-804). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lingefjärd, T., & Holmquist, M. (2005). To assess students’ attitudes, skills and competencies in mathematical modeling. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 24 (2-3), 123–133.
Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies?. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 38(2), 113–142.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 3-32). New York, NY: Springer.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.) Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Schaap, S., Vos, P., & Goedhart, M. (2011). Students overcoming blockages while building a mathematical model: exploring a framework. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 137-146). New York, NY: Springer.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Sol, M., Giménez, J., & Rosich, N. (2011). Project modelling routes in 12 to 16 -year-old pupils. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 231-242). New York, NY: Springer.
Soon, W., Lioe, L. T., & McInnes, B. (2011). Understanding the difficulties faced by engineering undergraduates in learning mathematical modelling, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(8), 1023-1039.
Spandaw, J. (2011). Practical knowledge of research mathematicians, scientists, and engineers about the teaching of modelling. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 679-688). New York, NY: Springer.
Stillman, G., & Brown, J. P. (2011). Pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ affinity with using modelling tasks in teaching years 8–10. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 289-298). New York, NY: Springer.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Swetz, F., & Hartzer, J. S. (Eds.) (1991). Mathematical modeling in the secondary school curriculum: A resource guide of classroom exercises. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Tyre, J., Eppinger, S. D., & Csizinszky, E. M. H. (1995). Systematic versus intuitive problem solving on the shop floor: Does it matter? Working Paper, 3716. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1999). Context problems and assessment: Ideas from the Netherlands. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools (pp.130-142). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. In K. P. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & Verschaffel, L. (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 257-276). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Zbiek, R. M., & Conner. A. (2006). Beyond motivation: exploring mathematical modelling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 89–112.

How to cite this article

APA

Sen Zeytun, A., Çetinkaya, B., & ERBAS, A. K. (2017). Understanding Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Processes in the Context of a Mathematical Modeling Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 691-722. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a

Vancouver

Sen Zeytun A, Çetinkaya B, ERBAS AK. Understanding Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Processes in the Context of a Mathematical Modeling Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3):691-722. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a

AMA

Sen Zeytun A, Çetinkaya B, ERBAS AK. Understanding Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Processes in the Context of a Mathematical Modeling Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3), 691-722. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a

Chicago

Sen Zeytun, Aysel, Bülent Çetinkaya, and A. Kursat ERBAS. "Understanding Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Processes in the Context of a Mathematical Modeling Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 3 (2017): 691-722. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a

Harvard

Sen Zeytun, A., Çetinkaya, B., and ERBAS, A. K. (2017). Understanding Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Processes in the Context of a Mathematical Modeling Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), pp. 691-722. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a

MLA

Sen Zeytun, Aysel et al. "Understanding Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Processes in the Context of a Mathematical Modeling Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, pp. 691-722. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00639a