Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alpaslan, M., Işıksal, M., & Haser, Ç. (2014). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of history of mathematics and their attitudes and beliefs towards using history of mathematics in mathematics education. Science & Education, 23, 159-183.
• Arıcı, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2015). The effect of origami based instruction on spatial visualization, geometry achievement, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 179-200.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Retrieved September 3, 2011 from http://des.emory.edu/mfp/014-BanduraGuide2006.pdf
• Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 127-147.
• Boakes, N. (2008). Origami-mathematics lessons: Paper folding as a teaching tool. Mathidues, 1(1), 1-9.
• Boakes, N. (2009). Origami instruction in the middle school mathematics classroom: Its impact on spatial visualization and geometry knowledge of students. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 32(7), 1-12.
• Brand, B. R., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2007). Using self-efficacy as a construct for evaluating science and mathematics method courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 297-317.
• Cagle, M. (2009). Modular origami in the secondary geometry classroom. In R. J. Lang (Eds.), Origami 4: Fourth international meeting of origami science, math, and education (pp. 497-506). Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
• Canadas, M., Molina, M., Gallardo, S., Martinez-Santaolalla, M., & Penas, M. (2010). Let’s teach geometry. Mathematics Teaching, 218, 32-37.
• Chan, K. K. (2015). Salient beliefs of secondary school mathematics teachers using dynamic geometry software. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 139-148.
• Cipoletti, B., & Wilson, N. (2004).Turning origami into the language of mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(1), 26-31.
• Clark, L. M., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Nishio, M., Campbell, P. F., Smith, T. M., Griffin, M. J., Hust, A. H., Conant, D. L., & Choi, Y. (2014). Teacher characteristics associated with mathematics teachers’ beliefs and awareness of their students’ mathematical dispositions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(2), 246-284.
• Coad, L. (2006). Paper folding in the middle school classroom and beyond. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 62(1), 6-13.
• Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Cornelius, V., & Tubis, A. (2009). On the effective use of origami in the mathematics classroom. In R. J. Lang (Eds.), Origami 4: Fourth international meeting of origami science, math, and education (pp. 507-515). Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
• Crocker, L, & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Florida: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
• Çakıroğlu, E., & Işıksal, M. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes and self efficacy beliefs toward mathematics. Education and Science, 34(151), 132-139.
• Çakmak, S., Işıksal, M., & Koç, Y. (2014). Investigating effect of origami based mathematics instruction on elementary students’ spatial skills and perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 59-68.
• Çokluk, O., Şekercioglu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Dede, Y., & Karakuş, F. (2014). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematiğe yönelik inançları üzerinde öğretmen eğitimi programlarının etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(2), 791-813.
• Demaine, E. D., & O’Rourke, J. (2007). Geometric folding algorithms: Linkages, origami, polyhedra. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• DeYoung, M. J. (2009). Math in the box. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(3), 134-141.
• Doruk, B. K. (2014). The educational approaches of Turkish pre-service elementary mathematics teachers in their first teaching practices: Traditional or constructivist. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(10), 113-134.
• Duatepe-Paksu, A. (2008). Comparing teachers' beliefs about mathematics in terms of their branches and gender. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35, 87-97.
• Fennema, E. (2002). Mathematics, gender, and research. In G. Hanna (Eds.), Towards gender equity in mathematics education (pp. 9-26). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Franco, B. (1999). Unfolding mathematics with unit origami. Emeryville: Key Curriculum Press.
• Georgeson, J. (2011). Fold in origami and unfold math. Mathematics Teaching in Middle School, 16(6), 354-361.
• Golan, M., & Jackson, P. (2010). Origametria: A program to teach geometry and to develop learning skills using the art of origami. Retrieved from http://www.emotive.co.il/origami/db/pdf/996_golan_article.pdf
• Hart, L. C. (2002). Preservice teachers’ beliefs and practice after participating in an integrated content methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 102(1), 4-14.
• Hartzler, S. (2003). Ratios of linear, area, and volume measures in similar solids. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(5), 228-232.
• Higginson, W., & Colgan, L. (2001). Algebraic thinking through origami. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(6), 343-349.
• Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
• Işıksal, M., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2005). Teacher efficacy and academic performance. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(4), 28-32.
• Johnson, D. A. (1999). Paper folding for the mathematics class. Washington: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Joet, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 649- 663.
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65-90.
• Kayan, R., Haser, Ç., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2013). Preservice teachers’ beliefs about the nature of teaching and learning mathematics. Education and Science, 38 (167), 179-195.
• Kelloway, K. E. (1998). Using Lisrel for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. London: Sage.
• Koç, Y. (2011). An investigation of the effect of department and years spent in the program on prospective teachers’ mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs. Education and Science, 36(160), 213-223.
• Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research, 41(1), 63-76.
• Mastin, M. (2007). Storytelling + origami = storigami mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(4), 206-212.
• Mehmetlioğlu, D., & Haser, Ç. (2013). Preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ preparedness for the teaching profession. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 34, 91-102.
• Morley, D., Till, K., Ogilvie, P., Turner, G. (2014). Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on the motor proficiency of children in the UK. Human Movement Science, 44, 150-156.
• Pagni, D. (2007). Paper folding fractions. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(4), 37-40.
• Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
• Pajares, M. F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 426-443.
• Pajares, M. F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). The role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem-solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.
• Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Eds.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes beliefs in learning to teach. In J. P. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Educators (2nd ed., pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
• Robichaux, R. R., & Rodrigue, P. R. (2003). Using origami to promote geometric communication. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9(4), 222-229.
• Shelby, L. B. (2011). Beyond Cronbach's alpha: Considering confirmatory factor analysis and segmentation. Human Dimension of Wildlife, 16, 142-148.
• Sinan, O., & Akyüz, G. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine yönelik inançları. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(17), 327-346.
• Swars, S. L., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., & Hart, L. C. (2009). A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers’ mathematics beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(1), 47-66.
• Sze, S. (2005). An analysis of constructivism and the ancient art of origami. Dunleavy: Niagara University. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED490350.pdf
• Tuğrul, B., & Kavici, M. (2002). Kağıt katlama sanatı ve öğrenme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(11), 1-17.
• Wares, A. (2011).Using origami boxes to explore concepts of geometry and calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(2), 264- 272.
• Yazıcı, E., & Ertekin, E. (2010).Gender differences of elementary prospective teachers in mathematical beliefs and mathematics teaching anxiety. World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology, 67, 128-131.
• Yuzawa, M., & Bart, W. M. (2002). Young children’s learning of size comparison strategies: Effect of origami exercises. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(4), 459-478.

APA

Arslan, O., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2016). Turkish Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Perceived Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding the Use of Origami in Mathematics Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1533-1548. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1243a

Vancouver

Arslan O, Işıksal-Bostan M. Turkish Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Perceived Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding the Use of Origami in Mathematics Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(6):1533-48. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1243a

AMA

Arslan O, Işıksal-Bostan M. Turkish Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Perceived Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding the Use of Origami in Mathematics Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(6), 1533-1548. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1243a

Chicago

Arslan, Okan, and Mine Işıksal-Bostan. "Turkish Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Perceived Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding the Use of Origami in Mathematics Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 6 (2016): 1533-1548. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1243a

Harvard

Arslan, O., and Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2016). Turkish Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Perceived Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding the Use of Origami in Mathematics Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), pp. 1533-1548. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1243a

MLA

Arslan, Okan et al. "Turkish Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Perceived Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding the Use of Origami in Mathematics Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 6, 2016, pp. 1533-1548. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1243a