Tracing Teacher Learning through Shifts in Discourses: The Case of a Mathematics Teacher

Emine Gül Çelebi İlhan; Ayhan Kürşat ERBAŞ

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a

Full Text (PDF)

Emine Gül Çelebi İlhan ¹ ^* , Ayhan Kürşat ERBAŞ ¹

More Detail

¹ Middle East Technical University^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background:
This study presents a methodology for investigating teacher learning in and from practice based on discourses that are in constant flux and transformation. Conceptualizing teacher learning as a frame of meaning based on knowing and doing discourses, the ideas are illustrated through data collected from a secondary mathematics teacher conducting an inquiry of self-practice.

Material and methods:
Narrative analysis of the data from the teacher interviews was conducted along with classroom observations of the teacher’s mathematical practice

Results:
The data supported that tracing shifts in teacher discourses enables to understand the connection between the teacher’s past discourses and the present discourses when identifying teacher learning.

Conclusions:
It is concluded that tracking teacher learning through two complementary discourses of the teacher’s instructional practice enabled a unification of individual and collective levels of the teacher learning by self-inquiry of own practice. Moreover, through the continuum of discourses, this study provided insights about the generation of new meanings through transformation of old meanings in the teacher learning.

Keywords

discursive learning
learning in and from practice
teacher discourses
teacher learning
teacher practices

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 13, Issue 6, June 2017, 1919-1942

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a

Publication date: 15 Jun 2017

Article Views: 1946

Article Downloads: 1111

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Austin T., & Senese J. C. (2004).Self-study in school teaching: Teachers‘ perspectives. In J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V.K. La Boskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practice (pp. 1231–1259). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers‘ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays [Estetikaslovesnogotvorchestva.] (V. W. McGee Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2002). Interpretive theory. In D. Marshand, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 156–161). London, UK: Palgrave.
Boaler, J. (2002). The development of disciplinary relationships: Knowledge, practice and identity in mathematics classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(1), 42–47.
Boaler, J. (2003). Studying and capturing the complexity of practice—The case of the ―dance of agency.‖ In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th Conference of PME-NA (Vol.1, pp.3–16). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle. S. L. (1993). Inside/outside teacher research and knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Communication. (2015). In Encyclopedia Britannica online. Retrieved from http://global.britannica.com/topic/communication
Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2014).Teacher inquiry defined. The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry (pp. 5–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research of Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355–376.
Day, C. (1999). Researching teaching through reflective practice. In J. J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching; Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 215–232). London, UK: Falmer Press.
Even, R., & Ball. D. L. (2009). Setting the stage for the ICMI study on the professional education and development of teachers of mathematics. In R.Even, & D.L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp.1–9). Boston, MA: Springer.
Foucault, M. (1970). The archeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers‘ generative change: A follow-up study of Professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653–689.
Fraser, H. (2004). Doing narrative research: Analyzing personal stories line by line. Qualitative Social Work, 3(2), 179–201.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.
Hall, E. (2009). Engaging in and engaging with research: Teacher inquiry and development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 669–681.
Halldén, O., Petersson, G., Scheja, M., Ehrlén, K., Haglund, L., Österlind, K., & Stenlund, A. (2002). Situating the question of conceptual change. In M. Limón, &L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 137–148). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Hoban, G. F., Butler, S., & Lesslie, L. (2007). Facilitating self-study of professional development: Researching the dynamics of teacher learning. Studying Teacher Education, 3(1), 35–51.
Jaworski, B. (2009). Learning in and from practice. In R. Even, &D.L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 143–148.) New York, NY: Springer.
Kelly, P. (2006). What is teacher learning? A sociocultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32(4), 505–519.
Kieran, C., Forman, E., & Sfard, A. (2001). Learning discourse: Sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1–3), 1–12.
Knuth, E., & Peressini, D. D. (1998). Why are you talking when you could be listening? The role of discourse in the professional development of mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 107–125.
Knuth, E., & Peressini, D. D. (2001). Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(5), 320–325.
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers‘ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
Martin, L., Nelson, K., & Tobach, E. (Eds.) (1995). Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing and knowing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Matos, J. F., Powell, A., Sztajn, P., Ejersbø, L., & Hovermill, J. (2009). Mathematics teachers ‗professional development: Processes of learning in and from practice. In R.Even, &D.L.Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp.167–183). Boston, MA: Springer.
Mohan, B. A. (2011).Social practice and register. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching (pp. 57–75). New York, NY: Routledge.
Moschkovich, J. (2007).Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.
Myers, M. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Opfer, D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407.
Ponte, J. P. (2001). Professional narratives in mathematics teacher education. In E. Simmt, & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of 2001 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 61–65). Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta.
Riessman, C. A. (2004). Narrative analysis. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Futing Liao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 705–709). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167–199.
Schön, D. A. (1983).Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, UK: Maurice Temple Smith.
Schöenfeld, A. H., Minstrell, J., &Van Zee, E. (2000).The detailed analysis of an established teacher carrying out a non-traditional lesson. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 281–325.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Silver, E. A., Clark, L. M., Ghousseini, H. N., Charalambous, C. Y., & Sealy, J. T. (2007). Where is the mathematics? Examining teachers‘ mathematical learning opportunities in practice-based professional learning tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 261–277.
Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher‘s perspective from the researchers‘ perspectives: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers‘ practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 252–264.
Simons, H., Kushner, S. Jones, K., & James, D. (2003). From evidence-based practice to practice-based evidence: the idea of situated generalization. Research Papers in Education, 18, 347–364.
Spicer, E. (2011). Power and knowledge-building in teacher inquiry: Negotiating interpersonal and ideational difference. Language and Education, 25(1), 1–17.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2006).Qualified pedagogical reflection as a way to improve mathematics education. Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 129–156.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1981). Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 177–195). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagner, D. (2007). Students‘ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 31–50.
Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739. doi:10.3102/0034654308330970
Wickman, P.O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601–623. doi:10.1002/sce.10036
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York, NY: Macmillan.

How to cite this article

APA

İlhan, E. G. Ç., & ERBAŞ, A. K. (2017). Tracing Teacher Learning through Shifts in Discourses: The Case of a Mathematics Teacher. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1919-1942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a

Vancouver

İlhan EGÇ, ERBAŞ AK. Tracing Teacher Learning through Shifts in Discourses: The Case of a Mathematics Teacher. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6):1919-42. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a

AMA

İlhan EGÇ, ERBAŞ AK. Tracing Teacher Learning through Shifts in Discourses: The Case of a Mathematics Teacher. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6), 1919-1942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a

Chicago

İlhan, Emine Gül Çelebi, and Ayhan Kürşat ERBAŞ. "Tracing Teacher Learning through Shifts in Discourses: The Case of a Mathematics Teacher". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 6 (2017): 1919-1942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a

Harvard

İlhan, E. G. Ç., and ERBAŞ, A. K. (2017). Tracing Teacher Learning through Shifts in Discourses: The Case of a Mathematics Teacher. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), pp. 1919-1942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a

MLA

İlhan, Emine Gül Çelebi et al. "Tracing Teacher Learning through Shifts in Discourses: The Case of a Mathematics Teacher". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 6, 2017, pp. 1919-1942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01208a