The Effects of the Use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on Fourth Grade Students’ Achievement in Science at Primary Stage and Their Attitudes towards it

Najeh Rajeh Alsalhi

doi:10.29333/ejmste/115165

Full Text (PDF)

Najeh Rajeh Alsalhi ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Ajman University, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the effects of KWL strategy in fourth grade students’ achievement in science and their attitudes towards using it. It compares the results of different ways of teaching science topics, and students’ attitudes towards their use. The study was conducted using a quasi-experimental design case study. The participants of the study were 62 students, divided into two groups: one an experimental group (n = 31) and the other a control group (n = 31). An achievement test and questionnaire were designed to confirm the study’s validity and reliability. SPSS was used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the experimental and the control groups, in favor of the experimental groups’ and attitudes, were also more positive towards the using of KWL strategy. The study recommends further research into using the KWL strategy in primary stage education.

Keywords

attitudes
KWL strategy
primary stage
science teaching
science achievement

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 16, Issue 4, April 2020, Article No: em1833

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115165

Publication date: 16 Jan 2020

Article Views: 4852

Article Downloads: 7684

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abu Youniss, M. (2013). The effectiveness of using (K.W.L) strategy on developing reading comprehension skills for the eighth graders in Khanyounis Governorate Schools, Department of Curricula and Teaching Methods (Unpublished Master thesis). Al-Azhar University-Gaza.
Ajzan, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
Akerson, V. (2001). Teaching science when your principal says, “Teach language arts.” Science and Children, 38(7), 42-47.
Akily, S. (2010). The impact of the use of meta-knowledge strategies in the teaching of science on achievement and knowledge skills and towards the subject of blind students. Journal of Studies in Curriculum and Instruction, 154, 26-66.
Aloraini, S. (2012). The impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the college of Education at King Saud University. Journal of King Saud University Languages and Translation, 24, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2012.05.002.
Araam, M. (2012). The impact of using (K.W.L) strategy on acquiring the concepts and critical thinking skills of science subject for the seventh-grade student (MA thesis). The Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza.
Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2008). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. New York: Guilford Press.
Bryan, J. (1998). K-W-L: Questioning the known. The Reading Teacher, 51(7), 618-620.
Camp, D. (2000). It takes two: Teaching with twin text of fact and fiction. The Reading Teacher, 53, 400-408.
Christo-Baker, E. (2004). College and university faculty attitude, incivilities and barriers towards distance education, (Unpublished Ph.D thesis), Bowling Green State University.
Conner, J. (2006). Advanced study of the teaching of secondary school reading instructional reading strategy: KWL (Know, Want to Learn, Learned). Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~l517/KWL.htm.
Ekwensi, F., Moranski, J., & Townsend-Sweet, M. (2006). E-learning concepts and techniques. Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania’s Department of Instructional Technology.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, Erlbaum.
Foote, C. J., Vermette, P. J., & Battaglia, C. F. (2001). Constructivist strategies: Meeting standards and engaging adolescent minds. Larchmont: Eye on Education.
Gammill, D. M. (2006). Learning to write way. The Reading Teacher, 59(8), 754-762. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.8.3.
Hayes, M. (2002). Elementary preservice teachers’ struggles to define inquiry-based science Teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015169731478.
Hershberger, K., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2015). Methods and strategies: KLEWS to explanation-building in science. Science and Children, 52(6), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc15_052_06_66.
Hewitt, P. G. (1990). Conceptually speaking. Science Teacher, 57(5), 54-57.
Hyder, I., & Bhamani, S. (2018). Bloom’s Taxonomy (Cognitive Domain) in Higher Education Settings: Reflection Brief. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 3(2), 288-300. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1039.
Ibrahim, N, N. (2012). The use of KWL technique in teaching reading descriptive text: A quasi-experimental study in the first grade of a senior high school in Bandung. Retrieved on 11 June 2018 from http://aresearch.upi.edu/operator/upload/s_ing_0608702_chapter3.pdf.
Jared, E. J., & Jared, A. H. (1997). Launching into improved comprehension. The Technology Teacher, 56(6), 24-31.
Kishta, A. (2008). Effectiveness of using metacognitive strategies on developing scientific concepts and life skills of fifth-grade students in Gaza (Unpublished Master thesis in education). Faculty of Education, Islamic University, Gaza.
Kopp, K. (2010). Everyday content-area writing: Write-to-learn strategies for Grades 3−5 (1st ed.). Gainesville: Maupin House.
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4.
Lismayanti, R. (2014). The effect of using KWL (Know, Want, Learned) strategy on EFL students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(7), 1.
Ministry of Education. (2015). UAE Education System. Retrieved on 21 September 2018 from https://www.moe.gov.ae/En/Documents/The%20FInal%20MOE%20Book%20(1).pdf.
Munck, M. (2007). Science pedagogy, teacher attitudes, and student success. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 19(2), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173660.
Nagel, L., Blignaut, A. S., & Cronjé, J. C. (2009). Readonly participants: A case for student participation in online classes. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701501028.
Nair, T. S., & Bindu, R. L. (2016). Effect of Blended Learning Strategy on Achievement in Biology and Social and Environmental Attitude of Students at Secondary Level. Journal on School Educational Technology, 11(4), 39-52. (EJ1131827). https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.11.4.6011.
Ogle, D. (2005). K-W-L + in action. In: H. Daniels & M. Bizar (Eds.). Teaching the best practice way: Methods that matter, K-12. Portland, Stenhouse.
Ogle, D. (2009). Creating contexts for inquiry: From KWL to PRC2. Knowledge Quest, 38(1), 56-61.
Piper, S. G. (1992). A metacognitive skills/reading comprehension intervention program for sixth-grade social studies students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 350 561).
Sasson, D. (2008). Use K-W-L technique in reading lessons: Strategic thought process for engaging students before they read. Retrieved from http://newteachersupport.suite101.com/article.cfm.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307.
Sinambela, E., Manik, S., & Pangaribuan, R. (2015). Improving students’ reading comprehension achievement by using K-W-L strategy. English Linguistics Research, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v4n3p13.
Siribunnam, R., & Tayraukham, S. (2009). Effects of 7-E, K.W.L and conventional instruction on analytical thinking, learning achievement and attitudes toward chemistry learning. Journal of Social Science, 4(5), 279-282. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.279.282.
Stahel, K. (2008). The Effects of Three Instructional Methods on the Reading Comprehension and Content Acquisition of Novice Readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(3), 359-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802520594.
Stahl, S., Sinatra, R., & Gregory, J. (1991). The role of prior knowledge and vocabulary in reading comprehension. Georgia: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Georgia.
Steele, J., & Dyer, T. (2014). Use of KWLs in the Online Classroom as It Correlates to Increased Participation. Journal of Instructional Research, 3, 8-14.
Sumardiono, D. (2013). Using KWLH technique to understand local descriptive texts in teaching reading: Enhancing teachers’ share through social media. Jurnal inovasi pendidikan, 1(2), 32-39.
Szabo, S. (2006). KWHHL: A student-driven evolution of the KWL. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 57-66.
Taslidere, E., & Eryilmaz, A. (2012). The relative effectiveness of integrated reading study strategy and conceptual physics approach. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9194-1.
Tok, S. (2008). The effects of note taking and K.W.L strategy on attitude and academic achievement. Hacettepe University. Journal of Education, 34, 244-253.
Weaver, C. (1994). Reading process and practice: From socio-psycholinguistics to whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Zouhor, Z., Bogdanović, I., Skuban, S., & Milica, P. (2017). The effect of the modified Know-Want-Learn strategy on sixth-grade students’ achievement in physics. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6). Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/624.

How to cite this article

APA

Alsalhi, N. R. (2020). The Effects of the Use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on Fourth Grade Students’ Achievement in Science at Primary Stage and Their Attitudes towards it. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1833. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115165

Vancouver

Alsalhi NR. The Effects of the Use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on Fourth Grade Students’ Achievement in Science at Primary Stage and Their Attitudes towards it. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(4):em1833. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115165

AMA

Alsalhi NR. The Effects of the Use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on Fourth Grade Students’ Achievement in Science at Primary Stage and Their Attitudes towards it. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(4), em1833. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115165

Chicago

Alsalhi, Najeh Rajeh. "The Effects of the Use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on Fourth Grade Students’ Achievement in Science at Primary Stage and Their Attitudes towards it". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 4 (2020): em1833. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115165

Harvard

Alsalhi, N. R. (2020). The Effects of the Use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on Fourth Grade Students’ Achievement in Science at Primary Stage and Their Attitudes towards it. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1833. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115165

MLA

Alsalhi, Najeh Rajeh "The Effects of the Use of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy (KWL) on Fourth Grade Students’ Achievement in Science at Primary Stage and Their Attitudes towards it". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 4, 2020, em1833. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115165