Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Beichner, R. J. (1996). The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1272-1277. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390.
• Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D., Allain, R. J., Bonham, S. W., Dancy, M. H., & Risley, J. S. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 1(1), 2-39.
• Bodner, G. M., Hunter, W. J., & Lamba, R. S. (1998). What happens when discovery laboratories are integrated into the curriculum at a large research university? The Chemical Educator, 3(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897980214a.
• Cummings, K., Marx, J., Thornton, R., & Kuhl, D. (1999). Evaluating innovation in studio physics. American Journal of Physics, 67(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19078.
• Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1-58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119.
• Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_3.
• Escalada, L. T. (1995). An investigation on the effects of using interactive digital video in a physics classroom on student learning and attitudes. (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University). Retrieved from https://web.phys.ksu.edu/dissertations/escaladaMS.pdf.
• Etkina, E. & Van Heuvelen, A. (2007). Investigative science learning environment–a science process approach to learning physics. Research-Based Reform of University Physics 1(1), 1-48. Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/PER/per _reviews/media/volume1/ISLE-2007.pdf.
• Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 54-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452876.
• Etkina, E., Murthy, S., & Zou, X. (2006). Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design. American Journal of Physics, 74(11), 979-986. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2238885.
• French, T., & Cummings, K. (2002, Aug). Effectiveness of abridged interactive lecture demonstrations. Paper presented at the Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2002, Boise, Idaho. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2002.pr.003.
• Gresser, P. W. (2006). A study of social interaction and teamwork in reformed physics laboratories. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland). Retrieved from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/3362/umi-umd-3171.pdf?sequence=1.
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
• Hestenes, D., & Wells, M. (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343498.
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497.
• Ivie, R., & Ray, K. N. (2005, Feb). Women in physics and astronomy, American Institute of Physics (AIP) Statistical Research Center. (AIP online published report no R-430.02). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2128268.
• Kung, R. L. (2005). Teaching the concepts of measurement: An example of a concept-based laboratory course. American Journal of Physics, 73(8), 771-777. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1881253.
• Lark, A. (2014). Implementation of scientific community laboratories and their effect on student conceptual learning, attitudes, and understanding of uncertainty. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Toledo). Retrieved from http://utdr.utoledo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2616&context=theses-dissertations.
• Lippmann, R. F. (2003). Students’ understanding of measurement and uncertainty in the physics laboratory: Social construction, underlying concepts, and quantitative analysis. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland). Retrieved from http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/dissertations/Lippmann/Body.pdf.
• McCullough, L. E. (2000). The effect of introducing computers into an introductory physics problem-solving laboratory. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9972998).
• McDermott, L. C. (2001). Oersted medal lecture 2001: Physics Education Research—the key to student learning. American Journal of Physics, 69(11), 1127-1137. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1389280.
• Morote, E. S., & Pritchard, D. E. (2009). What course element correlate with improvement on test in introductory Newtonian mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 77(8), 746-753. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3139533.
• National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Adapting to a changing world: Challenges and opportunities in undergraduate physics education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18312/adapting-to-a-changing-world-challenges-and-opportunities-in-undergraduate.
• Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite CD. New York: Wiley.
• Saul, J. M., & Beichner, R. (2001, July). An activity-based curriculum for large introductory physics classes: The SCALE-UP project. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2001, Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2001.pr.016.
• Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Sokoloff, D. R. (2012). RealTime Physics Active Learning Laboratories, Module 4: Light and optics (3rd Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Sokoloff, D. R., Laws, P. W., & Thornton, R. K. (2007). RealTime Physics: active learning labs transforming the introductory laboratory. European Journal of Physics, 28(3), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/S08.
• Sokoloff, D. R., Thornton, R. K., & Laws, P. W. (2011). RealTime Physics Active Learning Laboratories, Module 1: Mechanics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
• Sorensen, C., Churukian, A., Maleki, S., & Zollman, D. (2006). The New studio format for instruction of introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 74(12), 1077-1082. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2358999.
• Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858-867. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16350.
• Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1997, March). Realtime physics: active learning laboratory. Paper presented at the The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities, Vol. 39, (pp. 1101-1118). College Park, MD: AIP Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.53111.
• Upton, B. M. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of studio physics at Georgia State University. (Thesis, Georgia State University). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=phy_astr_theses.

APA

Riaz, M., Marcinkowski, T. J., & Faisal, A. (2020). The Effects of a DLSCL Approach on Students Conceptual Understanding in an Undergraduate Introductory Physics Lab. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), em1813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112311

Vancouver

Riaz M, Marcinkowski TJ, Faisal A. The Effects of a DLSCL Approach on Students Conceptual Understanding in an Undergraduate Introductory Physics Lab. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(2):em1813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112311

AMA

Riaz M, Marcinkowski TJ, Faisal A. The Effects of a DLSCL Approach on Students Conceptual Understanding in an Undergraduate Introductory Physics Lab. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(2), em1813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112311

Chicago

Riaz, Muhammad, Thomas J. Marcinkowski, and Ali Faisal. "The Effects of a DLSCL Approach on Students Conceptual Understanding in an Undergraduate Introductory Physics Lab". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 2 (2020): em1813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112311

Harvard

Riaz, M., Marcinkowski, T. J., and Faisal, A. (2020). The Effects of a DLSCL Approach on Students Conceptual Understanding in an Undergraduate Introductory Physics Lab. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), em1813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112311

MLA

Riaz, Muhammad et al. "The Effects of a DLSCL Approach on Students Conceptual Understanding in an Undergraduate Introductory Physics Lab". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 2, 2020, em1813. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112311