Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Aguirre-Munoz, Z., & Pantoya, M. (2016). Engineering literacy and engagement in Kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 630-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20151.
• Anderson, O. R., & Demetrius, O. J. (1993). A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’ narrative using science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 953-969. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300811.
• Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x.
• Blikstein, P., Kabayadondo, Z., Martin, A., Fields, D. (2017). An assessment instrument of technological literacies in makerspaces and fablabs. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 149-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20156.
• Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x.
• Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241.
• Brown, Q., & Burge, J. D. (2014, June). Motivate: Bringing out the fun with 3D printing and e-textiles for middle and high-school girls. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.
• Bursic, K., Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2011). Improving student attainment of ABET outcomes using model-eliciting activities (MEAs). Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
• Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Turns, J. (2002). Engineering student design processes: Look at evaluation practices across problems. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Montreal, Quebec.
• Clewell, B. C., & Braddock, J. (2000). Influences on minority participation in mathematics, science, and engineering. In G. Campbell Jr., R. Denes, & C. Morrison (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 89–137). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Clough, G. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering (NAE).
• Cohen, B. (2018). Teaching STEM after school: Correlates of instructional comfort. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1253537.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1032.
• Diefes-Dux, H., Bowman, K., Zawojewski, J., & Hjalmarson, M. (2006). Quantifying aluminum crystal size. Part 1: The model eliciting activity. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 7(1/2), 51–63.
• Dillon, P., and T. Howe. (2007). An epistemology of presence and reconceptualisation in design education. Interchange, 38(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-007-9013-4.
• Doerr, H. M., Ärlebäck, J. B., Costello Staniec, A. (2014). Design and effectiveness of modeling-based mathematics in a summer bridge program. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 92-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20037.
• Douglas, J., Iversen, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices and guidelines for the future. Retrieved from http://teachers.egfi-k12.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Engineering_in_the_K-12_Classroom.pdf.
• Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S.P., Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-based capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00260.x.
• Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008923410441.
• Flower, T. (2014). Growing the engineering education to employment pipeline: reflections and future directions. In A. Bainbridge, Z. T. Qi, & G. S. Gupta (Eds.), Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (25th: 2014). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Te Papa Tongarewa National Museum of Wellington, New Zealand.
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
• Han, S., Capraro, R., Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of students factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0.
• Horowitz, S. S., & Schultz, P. H. (2014). Printing space: Using 3D printing of digital terrain models in geosciences education and research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(1), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-031.1.
• International Technology Education Association (ITEA), ed. (2000/2002). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
• Johnsey, R. (1995). The place of the process skill making in design and technology: Lessons from research into the way primary children design and make. In Proceedings of the IDATER95: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University of Technology.
• Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. Zentralblatt fu¨ r Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(3), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652813.
• Kean, A., Miller, R., Self, B., Moore, T., Olds, B., & Hamilton, E. (2008). Identifying robust student misconceptions in thermal science using model-eliciting activities. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.
• Kimmel, H., J. Carpinelli, L. B. Alexander, and R. Rockland. (2006). Bringing engineering into k-12 schools: A problem looking for solutions? In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Chicago, IL.
• Kist, A. A. (2014). Supporting student engagement with capstone project presentations. In A. Bainbridge, Z. T. Qi, & G. S. Gupta (Eds.), Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (25th: 2014). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Te Papa Tongarewa National Museum of Wellington, New Zealand.
• Kolodner, J. L., P. J. Camp, D. Crismond, B. Fasse, J. Gray, J. Holbrook, S. Puntambekar, and M. Ryan. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2.
• Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2014). Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.001.
• Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. M. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607713.
• Lesh, R., Yoon, C., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). John Dewey revisited – Making mathematics practical versus making practice mathematical. In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 313–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Linn, M. (2003). Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305017.
• Massachusetts Department of Education (2016). Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2016-04.pdf.
• Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2013). Modeling in engineering: The role of representational fluency in students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 141-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20004.
• Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2006). The role of functionality in the mental representations of engineering students: Some differences in the early stages of expertise. Cognitive Science, 30(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_45.
• National Science Foundation. (2006). NSB science and engineering indicators report. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/.
• Nehdi, M. (2002). Crisis of civil engineering education in information technology age: analysis and prospects. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128(3), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2002)128:3(131).
• Raju, P. K., & Clayson, A. (2010). The future of STEM education: An analysis of two national reports. Journal of STEM Education, 11(5&6), 25-28.
• Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2003). Gender and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000017270.
• Ridgely, J., & Self, B. (2011). Model-eliciting activities in a mechanical engineering experimental methods course. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
• Sadler, T., S. Barab, and B. Scott. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9.
• Scalfani, V. F., & Vaid, T. P. (2014). 3D printed molecules and extended solid models for teaching symmetry and point groups. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1174-1180. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400887t.
• Self, B., & Widmann, J. (2010). Dynamics buzzword bingo: Active/collaborative/ inductive learning, model eliciting activities, and conceptual understanding. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY.
• Sinatra, G. M., Mukhopadhyay, A., Allbright, T. N., Marsh, J. A., Polikoff, M. S. (2017). Speedometry: A vehicle for promoting interest and engagement through integrated STEM instruction. The Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1273178.
• Song, T., Becker, K., Gero, J., DeBerard, S., Lawanto, O., & Reeve, E. (2016). Problem decomposition and recomposition in engineering design: A comparison of design behavior between professional engineers, engineering seniors, and engineering freshmen. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v27i2.a.3.
• Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x.
• Strimel, G., & Grubbs, M. E. (2016). Positioning technology and engineering education as a key force in STEM education. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v27i2.a.2.
• Tsai, C. C. (2001). Probing students’ cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a meta-listening technique. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 257 - 268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00029-3.
• Tsai, C.-C., & Huang, C.-M. (2002). Exploring students’ knowledge structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2002.9655827.
• Wells, J., Lammi, M., Gero, J., Grubbs, M. E., Paretti, M., & Williams, C. (2016). Characterizing design cognition of high school students: Initial analyses comparing those with and without pre-engineering experiences. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v27i2.a.5.
• Wu, Y.-T. (2013). University students’ knowledge structures and informal reasoning on the use of genetically modified foods: Multidimensional analyses. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1873-1890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9343-9.
• Zubrowski, B. (2002). Integrating science into design technology projects: Using a standard model in the design process. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v13i2.a.4.

APA

Lin, K.-Y., Hsiao, H.-S., Chang, Y.-S., Chien, Y.-H., & Wu, Y.-T. (2018). The Effectiveness of Using 3D Printing Technology in STEM Project-Based Learning Activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1633. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189

Vancouver

Lin KY, Hsiao HS, Chang YS, Chien YH, Wu YT. The Effectiveness of Using 3D Printing Technology in STEM Project-Based Learning Activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12):em1633. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189

AMA

Lin KY, Hsiao HS, Chang YS, Chien YH, Wu YT. The Effectiveness of Using 3D Printing Technology in STEM Project-Based Learning Activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12), em1633. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189

Chicago

Lin, Kuen-Yi, Hsien-Sheng Hsiao, Yu-Shan Chang, Yu-Hung Chien, and Ying-Tien Wu. "The Effectiveness of Using 3D Printing Technology in STEM Project-Based Learning Activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 12 (2018): em1633. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189

Harvard

Lin, K.-Y., Hsiao, H.-S., Chang, Y.-S., Chien, Y.-H., and Wu, Y.-T. (2018). The Effectiveness of Using 3D Printing Technology in STEM Project-Based Learning Activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1633. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189

MLA

Lin, Kuen-Yi et al. "The Effectiveness of Using 3D Printing Technology in STEM Project-Based Learning Activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 12, 2018, em1633. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189