Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Ahmadpour, F., Reid, D., & Reza Fadaee, M. (2019). Students’ ways of understanding a proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(2), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1570833
• Brandell, J. (1994). Helping students write paragraph proofs in geometry. Mathematics Teacher, 87(7), 498-502. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.87.7.0498
• Cirillo, M., & Herbst, P. G. (2011). Moving toward more authentic proof practices in geometry. Mathematics Educator, 21(2), 11-33.
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
• Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. Physics Education Research Conference, 8(1), 1-14.
• Herbst, P. G. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in American school geometry: Evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 283-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020264906740
• Inglis, M., & Aberdein, A. (2015). Beauty is not simplicity: An analysis of mathematicians’ proof appraisals. Philosophia Mathematica, 23(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nku014
• Knuth, E. J. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013838713648
• Lin, F. L., & Yang, K. L. (2007). The reading comprehension of geometric proofs: The contribution of knowledge and reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 729-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9095-6
• Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Fuller, E., Weber, K., Rhoads, K., & Samkoff, A. (2012). An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9349-7
• Ministry of Education and Culture. (2013). Act Ministry of Education and Culture No. 68 of 2013 about Content Standard for Junior Secondary School. Retrieved from https://lldikti12.ristekdikti.go.id/‌‌2013/06/28/permendikbud-tentang-kerangka-dasar-dan-struktur-kurikulum-tahun-2013.html
• Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Act Ministry of Education and Culture no. 21 of 2016 about Content Standard for Secondary School. Retrieved from https://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Permendikbud_Tahun2016_Nomor021_Lampiran.pdf
• Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2014). Functions of open flow-chart proving in introductory lessons of formal proving. In P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, C. Nicol & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 225-232). Vancouver, Canada: PME.
• Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2015). Flow-chart proofs with open problems as scaffolds for learning about geometrical proofs. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1211-1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0712-5
• Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2017). Students’ understanding of the structure of deductive proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9720-9
• National Education Standard Board. (2020). Fokus Pembelajaran SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/MA [Focuses of Learning in Elementary and Secondary School]. In W. Kamdi & B. Suryadi (Eds.), Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Retrieved from https://bsnp-indonesia.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/12/Fokus-Pembelajaran-2.pdf
• Panse, A., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2018). Reading proofs for validation and comprehension: An expert-novice eye-movement study. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(3), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0077-6
• Pape, S. J. (2004). Middle school children’s problem-solving behavior: A cognitive analysis from a reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(3), 187-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034912
• Pereira-Laird, J. A., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology, 18(3), 185-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271970180301
• Rota, G. (1997). The phenomenology of mathematical beauty. Synthese, 111(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004930722234
• Roy, S., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2010). Undergraduates proof comprehension: A comparative study of three forms of proof presentation [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://mathed.asu.edu/crume2009/proceedings.html
• Selden, A. (2012). Transitions and proof and proving at tertiary level. In G. Hanna & M. De Villiers (Eds.), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education: The 19th ICMI Study (Vol. 15, pp. 391-420). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_17
• Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2017). A comparison of proof comprehension, proof construction, proof validation and proof evaluation. In R. Göller, R. Biehler, R. Hochmuth, & H. G. Rück (Eds.) Proceedings of kompetenzzentrum hochschuldidaktik mathematik Conference (pp. 339-345). Hanover, Germany: khdm.
• Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.12.2.‌‌0088
• Weber, K. (2009). Mathematics majors’ evaluation of mathematical arguments and their conception of proof. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/‌‌crume2009/proceedings.html
• Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2011). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9292-z
• Wong, W. K., Yin, S. K., Yang, H. H., & Cheng, Y.-H. (2011). Using computer-assisted multiple representations in learning geometry proofs. Educational Technology and Society, 14(3), 43-54.
• Yang, K. L. (2012). Structures of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategy use for reading comprehension of geometry proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9350-1
• Yang, K. L., & Lin, F. L. (2008). A model of reading comprehension of geometry proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9080-6
• Yang, K. L., & Lin, F. L. (2012). Effects of reading-oriented tasks on students’ reading comprehension of geometry proof. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0039-2

APA

Anwar, L., Mali, A., & Goedhart, M. J. (2021). The Effect of Proof Format on Reading Comprehension of Geometry Proof: The Case of Indonesian Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), em1952. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782

Vancouver

Anwar L, Mali A, Goedhart MJ. The Effect of Proof Format on Reading Comprehension of Geometry Proof: The Case of Indonesian Prospective Mathematics Teachers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(4):em1952. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782

AMA

Anwar L, Mali A, Goedhart MJ. The Effect of Proof Format on Reading Comprehension of Geometry Proof: The Case of Indonesian Prospective Mathematics Teachers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(4), em1952. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782

Chicago

Anwar, Lathiful, Angeliki Mali, and Martin J Goedhart. "The Effect of Proof Format on Reading Comprehension of Geometry Proof: The Case of Indonesian Prospective Mathematics Teachers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 4 (2021): em1952. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782

Harvard

Anwar, L., Mali, A., and Goedhart, M. J. (2021). The Effect of Proof Format on Reading Comprehension of Geometry Proof: The Case of Indonesian Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), em1952. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782

MLA

Anwar, Lathiful et al. "The Effect of Proof Format on Reading Comprehension of Geometry Proof: The Case of Indonesian Prospective Mathematics Teachers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 4, 2021, em1952. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782