Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. A. (2013). Introduction to research in education (9th Ed.). California: Wadsworth.
• Bakar, K. A., Fauzi, A., & Tarmizi, A. (2010). Exploring the effectiveness of using GeoGebra and e-transformation in teaching and learning Mathematics, Proc. of Intl. Conf. of Advanced Educational Technologies EDUTE 02, 19–23.
• Bayazit, I., & Aksov, Y. (2010). Connecting representations and mathematical ideas with GeoGebra. GeoGebra: The New Language for the Third Millennium, 1(1), 93- 106.
• Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/749317.
• Cakir, R., & Yildirim, S. (2006). Prospective Teachers’ opinions on Factors that Contribute to Successful Technology Integration. Society for information technology and teacher Education International Conference, 2792-2797.
• Chan, H., Tsai, P., & Huang, T. Y. (2006). Web-based Learning in a Geometry Course. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 133-140.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th Ed). Routledge: USA.
• Demirbilek, M., & Özkale, A. (2014). Investigating the Effectiveness of Using GeoGebra in Associate Degree Mathematics Instruction. Necatibey Faculty of Education, Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 98-123.
• EMIS. (2013-2014). Annual Statistical Report of Government Schools, Elementary & Secondary Education Department, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Retrieved from http://www.kpese.gov.pk/ASCMain.html.
• Erbas, A. K., & Yenmez, A. A. (2011). The effect of inquiry-based explorations in a dynamic geometry environment on sixth grade students’ achievements in polygons. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2462-2475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.002.
• Farooq, R. A. (2001). Understanding Research in Education. Rawalpindi; University of Arid Agriculture.
• Gecu, Z., & Ozdener, N. (2010). The effects of using geometry software supported by digital daily life photographs on geometry learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2824–2828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.422.
• Goodwin, C. J. (2010). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design (6th ed). New York: John Wiley.
• Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity and Flexibility: A Proceptual View of Simple Arithmetic. The Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 115-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/749505.
• Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to Evaluate Higher Order thinking. Bostan, MA; Allyn and Bacon.
• Hesselbart, A. (2007). Mathematical reasoning and semiotics. A theoretical analysis of didactical challenges in learning to prove. University of Copenhagen. Retrieved on February 12, 2015 from http://www.ind.ku.dk/publikationer/studenterserien/studenterserie/thesisery5medbundtekstmedforside.pdf.
• Iqbal, M., Shawana, F., & Saeed, M. (2013). Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Education Course: A Case from Teacher Education Institutions in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 35(2, Special Issue), 37-53.
• Karadag, Z. (2009). Analyzing Students’ Mathematical Thinking in Technology-Supported Environments. University Toronto (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Toronto.
• Kospentaris, G., & Spyrou, P. (2007). Assessing the attainment of analytic – descriptive geometrical thinking with new tools. Working group 7, 5th Conference of the European Society for Research on Mathematics Education. Larnaca, Cyprus.
• KPK Text Book Board. (2006). Mathematics II: Calculus with Analytic Geometry. Peshawar: The KPK Text Board.
• Ljajko, E. (2013). Development of ideas in a GeoGebra – aided mathematics instruction. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 3(3, Special Issue: Dynamic and Interactive Mathematics Learning Environments), 1- 7. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.si.2013.01.
• Mason, M. (1998). The Van Hiele levels of geometric understanding. Professional Handbook for teachers, geometry: Explorations and applications. Boston: McDougal Inc.
• Mwei, P. K., Too, J. K., & Wando, D. (2011). The Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Student’s Attitudes and Achievement in Matrices and Transformations in Secondary Schools in Uasin. Gishu District, Kenya. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 1(1), 53 – 62. Retrieved from https://musicpannawit.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/the-effect-of-computer-assistedinstruction.pdf.
• Nesteor, P. G., & Schutt, R. K. (2014). Research Methods in Psychology: Investigation Human Behavior (2nd Ed.). London: Sage Publications.
• Olkun, S., Sinoplu, N. B., & Deryakulu, D. (2005). Geometric Explorations with Dynamic Geometry Applications based on Van Hiele Levels. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/olkun.pdf.
• Pandiscio, E. A., & Knight K. C. (2010). An Investigation into the van Hiele Levels of Understanding Geometry of Preservice Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Research in Education, Eastern Educational Research Association, 20(1), 45-52.
• Salim, Z. (2014). Exploring efficacy of GeoGebra in development of geometrical reasoning skills of students of grade 7 (Unpublished master’s thesis). Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
• Shadaan, P., & Leong. K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using GeoGebra on Students Understanding in Learning Circles. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1-11.
• Shroch, S. A., & Coscarelli, W. C. (2007). Criterion-referenced test development: Technical and legal guidelines for corporate training and certification (3rd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
• Tall, D, & Sheath, G. (1983). Visualizing higher level mathematical concepts using computer graphics, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Israel, 357–362.
• Timmer, M., & Verhoef, N. (2012). Increasing insightful thinking in analytic geometry. Nieuw archief voor wiskunde, 13(3), 2 - 4.
• Tran, T., Nguyen, N. G., Bui, M. D., & Phan, A. H. (2014). Discovery Learning with the Help of the GeoGebra Dynamic Geometry Software. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 7(1), 44-57.
• Van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing Geometric thinking through Activities that begin with play. Teaching children Mathematics, 310-16.
• Wainer, H., & Braun, H. I. (2013). Test Validity (Google eBook).
• Waismann, F. (1951). Introduction to Mathematical Thinking: The Formation of Concepts in Modern Mathematics. [Google Books version] Retrieved from https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=JWLDAgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false.
• Yazdani, M. (2007). Correlation between Students’ Levels of Understanding Geometry According to the van Hieles’ Model and Students Achievement in Plane Geometry. Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Mathematics Education, 2(2), 40-45.
• Young, A. E. (1909) On the Teaching of Analytic Geometry. The American Mathematical Monthly, 16(12), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967747.
• Zaman, A., Kayani, M. M., & Farooq, R. A. (2009). Developing and analyzing a multiple choice test in physics for Pakistani secondary schools. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum. Retrieved from http://waier.org.au/forums/2009/abstracts.html.

APA

Khalil, M., Farooq, R. A., Çakıroğlu, E., Khalil, U., & Khan, D. M. (2018). The Development of Mathematical Achievement in Analytic Geometry of Grade-12 Students through GeoGebra Activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83681

Vancouver

Khalil M, Farooq RA, Çakıroğlu E, Khalil U, Khan DM. The Development of Mathematical Achievement in Analytic Geometry of Grade-12 Students through GeoGebra Activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(4):1453-63. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83681

AMA

Khalil M, Farooq RA, Çakıroğlu E, Khalil U, Khan DM. The Development of Mathematical Achievement in Analytic Geometry of Grade-12 Students through GeoGebra Activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(4), 1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83681

Chicago

Khalil, Muhammad, Rahmat Ali Farooq, Erdinç Çakıroğlu, Umair Khalil, and Dost Muhammad Khan. "The Development of Mathematical Achievement in Analytic Geometry of Grade-12 Students through GeoGebra Activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 4 (2018): 1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83681

Harvard

Khalil, M., Farooq, R. A., Çakıroğlu, E., Khalil, U., and Khan, D. M. (2018). The Development of Mathematical Achievement in Analytic Geometry of Grade-12 Students through GeoGebra Activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), pp. 1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83681

MLA

Khalil, Muhammad et al. "The Development of Mathematical Achievement in Analytic Geometry of Grade-12 Students through GeoGebra Activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 4, 2018, pp. 1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83681