Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations

Al Jupri; Dian Usdiyana; Sumanang Muhtar Gozali

doi:10.29333/ejmste/14858

Full Text (PDF)

Al Jupri ¹ ^* , Dian Usdiyana ¹ , Sumanang Muhtar Gozali ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, INDONESIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to explore the teaching and learning processes of the school mathematics course for pre-service mathematics teachers in the case of systems of equations. Types of teaching and learning approaches and a symbol sense perspective were used as theoretical frameworks for this study. To do so, we conducted a qualitative case study, involving 35 pre-service mathematics teachers, in the form of classroom observations in one of the state universities in Bandung, Indonesia. The observations included the teaching and learning processes, a written formative test, and interviews. The results showed that the teaching and learning processes are implemented by using a deductive approach, and the written student work from the formative test and interviews revealed various solution strategies. From the symbol sense perspective, we conclude that the teaching and learning processes need to be enhanced to promote pre-service teachers’ procedural skills and conceptual understanding in a balanced manner.

Keywords

pre-service mathematics teachers
symbol sense
systems of equations
teaching and learning approaches

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2024, Article No: em2482

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858

Publication date: 01 Aug 2024

Online publication date: 23 Jul 2024

Article Views: 1426

Article Downloads: 462

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Akpalu, R., Adaboh, S., & Boateng, S. S. (2018). Towards improving senior high school students’ conceptual understanding of system of two linear equations. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.373336
Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248121
Arcavi, A. (2005). Developing and using symbol sense in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 42-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248497
Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Symbol sense behavior in digital activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 43-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41319539
Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2012). Effects of feedback in an online algebra intervention. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 17(1-2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-012-9191-8
Brown, G., & Quinn, R. J. (2007). Investigating the relationship between fraction proficiency and success in algebra. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(4), 8-15. https://albert.aamt.edu.au/Journals/Journals-Index/The-Australian-Mathematics-Teacher/AMT-63-4-8
Byusa, E., Kampire, E., & Mwesigye, A. R. (2020). Analysis of teaching techniques and scheme of work in teaching chemistry in Rwandan secondary schools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), Article em1848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7833
Chamoso, J. M., Cáceres, M. J., & Azcárate, P. (2012). Reflection on the teaching-learning process in the initial training of teachers. Characterization of the issues on which pre-service mathematics teachers reflect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.003
Dewi, I. L. K., Zaenuri, Dwijanto, & Mulyono. (2021). Identification of mathematics prospective teachers’ conceptual understanding in determining solutions of linear equation systems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1157-1170. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1157
Drijvers, P. (2000). Students encountering obstacles using a CAS. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(3), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009825629417
Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In S. Chio (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12^th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 135-151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_8
Drijvers, P. (2018). Digital assessment of mathematics: Opportunities, issues and criteria. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 41(1), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.7202/1055896ar
Drijvers, P., Goddijn, A., & Kindt, M. (2010). Algebra education: Exploring topics and themes. In P. Drijvers (Ed.), Secondary algebra education: Revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown (pp. 5-26). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-334-1_1
Irfan, M., Nusantara, T., Wijayanto, Z., & Widodo, S. A. (2019). Why do pre-service teachers use the two-variable linear equation system concept to solve the proportion problem? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), Article 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012013
Isik, C., & Kar, T. (2012). The analysis of the problems posed by the pre-service teachers about equations. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(9), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n9.1
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2016). An instrumentation theory view on students’ use of an applet for algebraic substitution. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v23.2.02
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Gozali, S. M. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ strategies in solving absolute value equations and inequalities. Education Sciences, 12(11), Article 743. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110743
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Sispiyati, R. (2020). Predictions of students’ thinking for the learning of system of linear equations in two variables. In L. S. Riza, E. C. Prima, T. Hadibarata, & P. J. Aubusson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7^th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar (pp. 1-7). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296322
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Sispiyati, R. (2021). Teaching and learning process for mathematization activities: The case of solving maximum and minimum problems. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i2.13263
Kılıç, H. (2011). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(2), 17-35. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojqi/issue/21391/229349
Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017973827514
Kirvan, R., Rakes, C. R., & Zamora, R. (2015). Flipping an algebra classroom: Analyzing, modeling, and solving systems of linear equations. Computers in the Schools, 32(3-4), 201-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2015.1093902
Kop, P. M., Janssen, F. J., Drijvers, P. H., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). The relation between graphing formulas by hand and students’ symbol sense. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09970-3
Kop, P. M., Janssen, F. J., Drijvers, P. H., & van Driel, J. H. (2021). Promoting insight into algebraic formulas through graphing by hand. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1765078
McCrory, R., Floden, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Reckase, M. D., & Senk, S. L. (2012). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 584-615. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0584
Ndemo, Z., Zindi, F., & Mtetwa, D. (2017). Mathematics undergraduate student teachers’ conceptions of guided inductive and deductive teaching approaches. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v6n2p75
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
Proulx, J., Beisiegel, M., Miranda, H., & Simmt, E. (2009). Rethinking the teaching of systems of equations. The Mathematics Teacher, 102(7), 526-535. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.102.7.0526
Ramsden, P. (1987). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078712331378062
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.12.2.0088
Stephan, M. (2020). Teacher-centered teaching in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 836-840). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_150
Tanisli, D., & Kose, N. Y. (2013). Pre-service mathematic teachers’ knowledge of students about the algebraic concepts. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n2.1
Van Amerom, B. A. (2003). Focusing on informal strategies when linking arithmetic to early algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005237.72281.bf
Van Dooren, W., Verschaffel, L., & Onghena, P. (2003). Pre-service teachers’ preferred strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022109006658
van Stiphout, I., Drijvers, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). The development of students’ algebraic proficiency. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2-3), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/274
Wardani, S., & Kusuma, I. W. (2020). Comparison of learning in inductive and deductive approach to increase student’s conceptual understanding based on international standard curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21155
Wilson, S., & McChesney, J. (2018). From course work to practicum: Learning to plan for teaching mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(2), 96-113. https://mted.merga. net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/406
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12144
Young, J. W. A. (1968). The teaching of mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 61(3), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.61.3.0287

How to cite this article

APA

Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Gozali, S. M. (2024). Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), em2482. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858

Vancouver

Jupri A, Usdiyana D, Gozali SM. Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(8):em2482. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858

AMA

Jupri A, Usdiyana D, Gozali SM. Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(8), em2482. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858

Chicago

Jupri, Al, Dian Usdiyana, and Sumanang Muhtar Gozali. "Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 8 (2024): em2482. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858

Harvard

Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., and Gozali, S. M. (2024). Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), em2482. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858

MLA

Jupri, Al et al. "Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 8, 2024, em2482. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858