Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. and Wong, B. (2012), “Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96, 967–989.
• Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582.
• Barman, C. R. (1996). How do students really view science and scientists? Science and Children, 34(1), 30-33.
• Barman, C. (1997). Students’ views about scientists and school science. Science and Children, 34 (1), 18-23.
• Barman, C. R. (1999). Students’ views about scientists and school science. Engaging K-8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 43-54.
• Basalla, G. (1976). The depiction of science in popular culture. In G. Holton & W. A. Blanpied (Eds.), Science and its public (pp. 261-278). Dordrecht—Holand: Reidel Publishing Company.
• Beardsley, D. C., & O’Dowd, D. D. (1961). The collegestudent image of the scientist. Science, 122 (3457), 997- 1001.
• Bowtell, E. (1996). Educational stereotyping: Children’s perceptions of scientist, 1990’s style. Investigating: Australian Primary and Junior Science Journal, 12(1).
• Buldu, M. (2006). Young children’s perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121-132.
• Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971– 1002.
• Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243– 257.
• Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255- 265.
• Charlton, B. G, & Andras, P. (2006). Globalization in science education: an inevitable and beneficial trend. Medical Hypotheses 66, 869-873
• Citro, C. F., & Kalton, G.(1989). Surveying the Nation's Scientists and Engineers: A Data System for the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
• Farenga, S.J., & Joyce, B.A. (1998). Science-related attitudes and science course selection: A study of high ability boys and girls. Roeper Review, 20, 247–250.
• Farland, D., & McComas, W.F. (2007). The Enhanced (DAST): A more valid, efficient, reliable & complete method of identifying students’ perceptions of scientists. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching Conference, New Orleans, LA.
• Finson, K.D. (2003). Applicability of the DAST-C to the images of scientists drawn by students of different racial groups. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 15- 26.
• Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science & Mathematics, 107, 335-345.
• Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Drawa-Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(41) 195-205.
• Ford, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 8-13.
• Fung, Y. Y. H. (2002). A comparative study of primary and secondary school students’ images of scientists. Research in Science & Technology Education, 20(2), 199-213. .
• Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings. New York: Basic Books.
• Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes toward science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1-41.
• Gilmartin, S.K., Li, E., & Aschbacher, P. (2006). The relationship between interest in physical science/engineering, science class experiences, and family contexts: Variations by gender and race/ethnicity among secondary students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12, 179–207.
• Greenfield, T.A. (1995). Sex differences in science museum exhibit attraction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 925-938.
• Goodenough, F. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: World Book Co.
• Haladyna, T., Olson, R., & Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Relations of student, teacher, and learning environment variables to attitudes toward science. Science Education, 66, 671- 687.
• Hammrich, P. L. (1997). Confronting the gender gap in science and mathematics: The sisters in science program. (Report No. SE059829). Oak Brook, IL: National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406167).
• Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
• Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.
• Jarvis & Rennie (1995). Children’s choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education 25(3), 239-252
• Johnson, S. (1987). Gender Differences in Science: parallels in interest, experience and performance. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 467-481.
• Ju, E., Lee, S., Kim, J. & Lee, J. J. (2009). Analysis of Images of Scientists and Science Learning Drawn by Third Grade Students. Journal of the Korean society of Elementary Science Education, 28 (1). 35-45.
• Jeon, B. (2004). The analysis of the ideas and the sources of their ideas about the images of the scientist in elementary school (Master’s thesis). Korea National University of Education, Chung-buk, Korea.
• Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M.K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131-140.
• Klopfer, L. E.(1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning, B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, and G. F. Madaus (Eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill, I97 I.
• Kwon, N. (2005). Elementary school students' perceptions of scientist and socio-cultural background towards Science. Journal of the Korean society of Elementary Science Education, 24 (1), 55-67.
• Lee, Y, J., Micheal-Roth, W. (2007) Science education in an era of globalization: an introduction. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 13-15.
• Lietz, P., Miller, L., & Kotte, D. (2002). On decreasing gender difference and attitudinal changes: Factors influencing Australian and English pupils’ choice of career in science. Psychology, Evolution and Gender, 4, 69–92.
• Lightbody, P., & Durndell, A. (1996a). Gendered Career Choice: is sex-stereotyping the cause or the consequence. Educational Studies, 22(2), 133-146.
• Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M (2008). Some methodological issues with “draw a scientist tests” among young children. The International Journal of Science Education 30(6), 773-792.
• Lunn, M., & Noble, A. (2008). Re-visioning science “love and passion in the scientific imagination.” International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 793–805.
• Markus, H. & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.) (Vol. 1, pp. 127-230). New York: Random House
• Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Beaton, A.E., Gonzalez, E.J., Smith, T.A., Gregory, K.D., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International Science Report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the Third International Science and Science Study (TIMSS) at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College also in http:/ /isc.bc.edu/timss1999i/pdf/T99i_Sci_All.pdf.
• Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., & Hunt, A. (1988). Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science and Technology Education, 6(2), 159-166.
• Mays, A. (2001). Student stereotypes of scientists: Can they be changed? Retrieved August 30, 2007, from http://www.bamaed.ua.edu/~amays/actionresearch.htm
• McDuffie, T. E., Jr. (2001). Scientists: Geeks and nerds. Science and Children, 38(8), 16-19.
• Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study. Science, 126, 386- 390.
• Medina-Jerez, W., Middleton, K. V., & Orihuela-Rabaza, W. (2011). Using the DAST-C to explore Colombian and Bolivian students' images of scientists. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 657-690.
• Monhardt, R. M. (2003). The image of the scientist through the eyes of Navajo children. Journal of American Indian Education, 42(3), 25–39.
• Moseley, C., & Norris, D. (1999). Preservice teachers’ views of scientists. Science and Children, 37(6), 50-53.
• National Science Board (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).
• Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: a longitudinal study. Science Education, 72, 143–155.
• Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and its Implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–107
• Ozden, M. (2007). Problems with Science and Technology Education in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 157-161.
• Robertson, I. J. (1987). Girls and boys and practical science. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 505-518
• Rubin, E., Bar, V., Cohen, A. (2003). The images of Scientists and Science among Hebrew-and Arabicspeaking pre-service teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 821-846.
• Schibeci, R. A., & Sorenson, I. (1983). Elementary school children’s perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14-19.
• She, H. (1995). Elementary and middle school student’s image of science and scientists related to current science books in Taiwan. Research in Science & Technological Education, 4, 283-294
• Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. (1990). A Summary of Major Influences on Attitude toward and Achievement in Science among Adolescent Students. Science Education, 74(1), 1-18.
• Sjøberg, S. (2002). Science for the children? Report from the Science and Scientists-project – Acta Didactica. - (1/2002) Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.
• Smith, W., & Erb, T. (1986). Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 667-676.
• Song, J., & Kim, K-S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957-977.
• Stake, J. E., & Nickens, S. D. (2005). Adolescent girls’ and boys’ Science peer relationships and perceptions of the possible self as scientist. Sex Roles, 52(1-2), 1–11.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Open coding. In A. Strauss & J. Corbin (Eds.), Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed., pp. 101-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Symington, D., & Spurling, H. (1990). The Draw a Scientist Test: Interpreting the data. Research in Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 75-77.
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning Early for Careers in Science. Science, 312, 1143–1144.
• Thomas, M. D., Henley, T. B., & Snell, C. M. (2006). The Draw a Scientist Test: A Different Population and a Somewhat Different Story. .
• Türkmen, H. (2008).Turkish primary students’ perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 55–61. College Student Journal, 40(1), 140-148.
• Varghese, G. (2008). Declining Trends in Science Education and Research in Indian Universities. Universities as Centres of Research and Knowledge Creation: An Endangered Species, 201-212.
• Ward, A. (1977). Magician in a white coat. Science Activities, 14(1), 6-9.
• Whitehead, J. M. (1996). Sex stereotypes, gender identity and subject choice at A level. Educational Research, 38(2), 147- 160.
• Willson, V. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of the relationship between science achievement and science attitude: Kindergarten through college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 839-850.
• Xie, Yu and Killewald, A. A. (2012). Is American Science in Decline? Harvard University Press.
• Xie, Yu., & Shauman, K. A (2003). Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

APA

Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., & Suh, J. (2013). Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a

Vancouver

Narayan R, Park S, Peker D, Suh J. Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(2):115-29. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a

AMA

Narayan R, Park S, Peker D, Suh J. Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a

Chicago

Narayan, Ratna, Soonhye Park, Deniz Peker, and Jeekyung Suh. "Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2013 9 no. 2 (2013): 115-129. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a

Harvard

Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., and Suh, J. (2013). Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), pp. 115-129. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a

MLA

Narayan, Ratna et al. "Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 9, no. 2, 2013, pp. 115-129. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a