STEM pre-service teacher education: A review of research trends in the past ten years

Yingqian Zhang; Jiabin Zhu

doi:10.29333/ejmste/13300

Full Text (PDF)

Yingqian Zhang ¹ ^* , Jiabin Zhu ¹

More Detail

¹ Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, CHINA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The urgent need for high-quality STEM teachers put forward a high demand for STEM pre-service teacher education, which generates a variety of research. This study aims to systematically review relevant articles using the CiteSpace software to visualize the research trends and research hotspots of STEM pre-service teacher education. 166 articles were selected from the Web of Science core collection database from 2012 to 2021. The results show that the research hotspots mainly include single-discipline pre-service teacher training, the design of STEM pre-service teacher training programs, and the application of modern high technology in education. While the research trends are reflected in the interdisciplinary and integrated training of STEM pre-service teachers, the construction of an evaluation system of STEM pre-service teacher education, and the integration and degree of application of high technology. The results provide an objective research basis for subsequent studies.

Keywords

STEM
pre-service teacher education
CiteSpace
cluster analysis
review

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 19, Issue 7, July 2023, Article No: em2292

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13300

Publication date: 01 Jul 2023

Online publication date: 21 May 2023

Article Views: 1714

Article Downloads: 1294

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & De Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0
Allen, P. J., Chang, R., Gorrall, B. K., Waggenspack, L., Fukuda, E., Little, T. D., & Noam, G. G. (2019). From quality to outcomes: A national study of afterschool STEM programming. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0191-2
Altan, E. B., Ozturk, N., & Turkoglu, A. Y. (2018). Socio-scientific issues as a context for STEM education: A case study research with pre-service science teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 805-812. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.805
Aydin-Gunbatar, S., Ekiz-Kiran, B., & Oztay, E. S. (2020). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for integrated STEM development with LESMeR model. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1063-1082. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00074D
Bartels, S. L., Rupe, K. M., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Shaping preservice teachers’ understandings of STEM: A collaborative math and science methods approach. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 666-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1602803
Belardo, C., Burrows, A. C., & Dambekalns, L. (2017). Partnering science and art: Pre-service teachers’ experiences for use in pre-collegiate classrooms. Problems of Education in the 21^st Century, 75(3), 215. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/17.75.215
Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9
Berisha, F., & Vula, E. (2021, May). Developing pre-service teachers conceptualization of STEM and STEM pedagogical practices. Frontiers in Education, 6, 585075. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.585075
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Buber, A., & Coban, G. U. (2020). From modeling to STEM: A predictor activity of volcanic eruption. Science Activities, 57(3), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2020.1814193
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning (pp. 1-5). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_1
Chen, C. (2014). The CiteSpace manual. College of Computing and Informatics, 1(1), 1-84
Chen, C. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. Nova Science Publishers.
Cinar, S., Pirasa, N., & Sadoglu, G. P. (2016). Views of science and mathematics pre-service teachers regarding STEM. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1479-1487. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040628
Gül, K. S., & Taşar, M. F. (2020). A review of researches on STEM in preservice teacher education. Ilkogretim Online, 19(2), 515-539. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689682
Gunbatar, M. S., & Bakirci, H. (2019). STEM teaching intention and computational thinking skills of pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1615-1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9849-5
Hall, P., & Weaver, L. (2001). Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: A long and winding road. Medical Education, 35(9), 867-875. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00919.x
Hsu, Y. S., Tang, K. Y., & Lin, T. C. (2023). Trends and hot topics of STEM and STEM education: A co-word analysis of literature published in 2011-2020. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00419-6
Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., & Yllana Prieto, F. (2020). Sustainable and flipped STEM education: Formative assessment online interface for observing pre-service teachers’ performance and motivation. Education Sciences, 10(10), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100283
Jocius, R., O’Byrne, W. I., Albert, J., Joshi, D., Robinson, R., & Andrews, A. (2021). Infusing computational thinking into STEM teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 166-179.
Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2020). The use of developmentally mobile applications for preparing pre-service teachers to promote STEM activities in preschool classrooms. In S. Papadakis & M. Kalogiannakis (Eds.), Mobile learning applications in early childhood education (pp. 82-100). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1486-3.ch005
Kaplon-Schilis, A., & Lyublinskaya, I. (2020). Analysis of relationship between five domains of TPACK framework: TK, PK, CK math, CK science, and TPACK of pre-service special education teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09404-x
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Khalil, N., & Osman, K. (2017). STEM-21CS module: Fostering 21^st century skills through integrated STEM. K-12 STEM Education, 3(3), 225-233.
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
King, D., Lyons, T., Dawes, L., Doyle, T., & O Loughlin, M. (2018). Stem resources on demand (STEMROD): Working with community/industry partners and pre-service teachers to develop’ ready to use’ resources for teachers. Teaching Science, 64(2), 31-37.
Klaassen, R. G. (2018). Interdisciplinary education: A case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(6), 842-859. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1442417
Koehler, A. A., Feldhaus, C. R., Fernandez, E., & Hundley, S. (2013). STEM alternative certification programs & pre-service teacher preparedness. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(4), 45-55.
Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. ESA Issue Brief# 03-11. US Department of Commerce. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522129.pdf
Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Systems thinking of pre-and in-service science and engineering teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 248-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1548788
Lawner, E. K., Quinn, D. M., Camacho, G., Johnson, B. T., & Pan-Weisz, B. (2019). Ingroup role models and underrepresented students’ performance and interest in STEM: A meta-analysis of lab and field studies. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 1169-1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09518-1
Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Lewis, F., Edmonds, J., & Fogg-Rogers, L. (2021). Engineering science education: the impact of a paired peer approach on subject knowledge confidence and self-efficacy levels of student teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 793-822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1887544
Li, J. & Chen, C. (2016). CiteSpace: Text mining and visualization in scientific literature. Capital University of Economics and Business Press.
Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5
Li, Y., Xiao, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, N., Pang, Y., Wang, R., Qi, C., Yuan, Z., Xu, J., Nite, S. B., & Star, J. R. (2022). A systematic review of high impact empirical studies in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00389-1
Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9
López-Banet, L., Aguilera, D., Jiménez-Liso, M., & Perales-Palacios, F. J. (2021). Emotional and cognitive preservice science teachers’ engagement while living a model-based inquiry science technology engineering mathematics sequence about acid-base. Frontiers in Psychology, 4367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719648
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Marín-Marín, J. A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: a bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x
Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. (2013). Perceptions, engagement, and practices of teachers seeking professional development in place-based integrated STEM. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(2), 242-266.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
Park, H., Byun, S. Y., Sim, J., Han, H. S., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM education in South Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739-1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2019). Preservice teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 493-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9
Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Storti, M., & Mazzieri, E. (2019). Implementation and assessment methodologies of teachers’ training courses for STEM activities. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9356-1
Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kiray, S. A. (2018). STEM skills in the 21^st century education. Research highlights in STEM education, 81-101.
Sisman, B., & Kucuk, S. (2019). An educational robotics course: Examination of educational potentials and pre-service teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 510-531.
Smith, K. L., Rayfield, J., & McKim, B. R. (2015). Effective practices in STEM integration: Describing teacher perceptions and instructional method use. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04183
Tosun, C. (2022). Analysis of the last 40 years of science education research via bibliometric methods. Science & Education, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00400-9
Tytler, R. (2020). STEM education for the twenty-first century. Integrated Approaches to STEM Education: An International Perspective, 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3
Wu, T., & Albion, P. (2019). Investigating remote access laboratories for increasing pre-service teachers’ STEM capabilities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 82-93.
Yildirim, B., & Sidekli, S. (2018). STEM applications in mathematics education: The effect of STEM applications on different dependent variables. Journal of Baltic Science Education 17(2). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.200
Zhao, Z. J. (2015). The process of STEM education policies in America. Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press.
Zhu, K. (2020). Theory and practice of STEM education from an international perspective. Science Press.

How to cite this article

APA

Zhang, Y., & Zhu, J. (2023). STEM pre-service teacher education: A review of research trends in the past ten years. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2292. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13300

Vancouver

Zhang Y, Zhu J. STEM pre-service teacher education: A review of research trends in the past ten years. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(7):em2292. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13300

AMA

Zhang Y, Zhu J. STEM pre-service teacher education: A review of research trends in the past ten years. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(7), em2292. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13300

Chicago

Zhang, Yingqian, and Jiabin Zhu. "STEM pre-service teacher education: A review of research trends in the past ten years". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 7 (2023): em2292. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13300

Harvard

Zhang, Y., and Zhu, J. (2023). STEM pre-service teacher education: A review of research trends in the past ten years. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2292. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13300

MLA

Zhang, Yingqian et al. "STEM pre-service teacher education: A review of research trends in the past ten years". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 7, 2023, em2292. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13300