Relevant Content for a Scientific Collaboration in Mathematics and Physics Education Research - A Comparative Content Analysis of Handbooks and Conference Proceedings in Germany and Vietnam

Eduard Krause; Frederik Dilling; Simon Friedrich Kraus; Nguyen Phuong Chi; Tran Ngoc Chat; Nguyen Van Bien

doi:10.29333/ejmste/114097

Full Text (PDF)

Eduard Krause ¹ ^* , Frederik Dilling ¹ , Simon Friedrich Kraus ¹ , Nguyen Phuong Chi ², Tran Ngoc Chat ², Nguyen Van Bien ²

More Detail

¹ University of Siegen, GERMANY² Hanoi National University of Education, VIET NAM^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This article presents a possible framework for the cooperation of mathematics and physics education research domains. Moreover, the potential topics for such a scientific collaboration are explained by means of a structuring qualitative content analysis of current handbooks and conference proceedings in Germany and Vietnam. These topics can form a basis for further projects on the connection of subject-related didactics. One of these projects is an interdisciplinary course in teacher training at the Hanoi National University of Education (HNUE) as part of the Inter TeTra project between the HNUE and the University of Siegen.

Keywords

interdisciplinarity
international comparative study
qualitative content analysis
relationship between mathematics and physics
STEM education
teacher training

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 16, Issue 4, April 2020, Article No: em1836

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114097

Publication date: 26 Jan 2020

Article Views: 4800

Article Downloads: 1628

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Baker, C. K., & Galanti, T. M. (2017). Integrating STEM in elementary classrooms using model-eliciting activities: responsive professional development for mathematics coaches and teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0066-3.
Bauersfeld, H. (1983). Subjektive Erfahrungsbereiche als Grundlage einer Interaktions-theorie des Mathematiklehrens und -lernens. In H. Bauersfeld, H. Bussmann, & G. Krummheuer (Eds.), Lernen und Lehren von Mathematik. Analysen zu Unterrichtshandeln II (pp. 1–56). Köln: Aulis.
Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2005). Modellieren im Unterricht mit der Tanken-Aufgabe. Der Mathematikunterricht, 25(1), 18-21.
Böttcher, F., & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in Science Education: A Model-based Framework. Sci & Educ, 20 (2), 103–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9304-5.
Brandenburger, M., Mikelskis-Seifert, S., & Labudde, P. (2014). Problemlösen in der Mechanik: eine Untersuchung mit Studierenden. Phy-DidB – Didaktik der Physik, Beitrag DD 13.05.
Bröll, L., & Friedrich, J. (2012). Zur Qualifikation der Lehrkräfte für den NWA-Unterricht – eine Bestandsaufnahme in Baden-Württemberg. Der mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 65(3), 180-186.
Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2017). Professional Development Through STEM Integration: How Early Career Math and Science Teachers Respond to Experiencing Integrated STEM Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 59(5), 389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x.
Bruder, R., Linneweber-Lammerskitten, H., & Reibold, J. (2015). Individualisieren und differenzieren. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebecker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.), Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 513-538). Berlin, Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_19.
Büchter, A., Scheibke, N., & Wilzek, W. (2017). Zur Problematik des Übergangs von der Schule in die Hochschule – Zielsetzungen, Eingangsvoraussetzungen und Wirksamkeit von Vorkursen Mathematik. In U. Kortenkamp, & A. Kuzle (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2017 (pp. 151-154). Münster: WTM.
Bui, V. N. (2011). Giáo trình Phương pháp dạy học những nội dung cụ thể môn Toán. Hanoi: The HNUE Publishing House.
Bui, V. N. (2017). Vận dụng lí luận vào thực tiễn dạy học môn Toán ở trường phổ thông. Hanoi: The HNUE Publishing House.
Bui, V. N. (2018). Some contents integrating mathematics and physics in high school. Proceeding of the international conference in mathematics education: An integrated approach in mathematics education and teacher training.
Bui, V. N., & Chu, C. T. (2014). High School Mathematical Contest in Modeling. Proceeding of the national conference of research on mathematics education in the orientation of developing learners’ competencies for the period 2014-2020.
Carrejo, D. J., & Marshall, J. (2007). What is mathematical modelling? Exploring prospective teachers use of experiments to connect mathematics to the study of motion. Mathematics Education Research Journal, (19), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217449.
Caviola, H. (2012). Wie Fächer miteinander ins Gespräch kommen: Modelle der Fächervernetzung und ihre Lernziele. In H. Caviola, et al. (Eds.), TriOS: Nr. 2/2012. Interdisziplinarität (5-36). Münster: LIT-Verlag.
Communist Party of Vietnam (2013). Resolution on “Fundamental and comprehensive innovation in education, serving industrialization and modernization in a socialist-oriented market economy during international integration” ratified in the 8th session.
Cormas, P. C. (2017). Preservice Teachers` Reconciliation on an Epistemological Issue in an Integrated Mathematics/ Science Methods Course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 1463-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9755-5.
Dao, T., & Nguyen, C. T. (2015). Các năng lực cốt lõi của giáo viên Toán phổ thông đáp ứng yêu cầu đổi mới chương trình, sách giáo khoa môn Toán sau năm 2015. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Dao, T., & Tran, T. (2010). Tổ chức hoạt động nhận thức trong dạy học môn Toán ở trường Trung học phổ thông. Hanoi: The HNUE Publishing House.
Đào, V. P. (2003). Lịch sử vật lí học 2nd Edition. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (2002). “Interdisziplinarität” in der wissenschaftlichen Diskussion und Konsequenzen für die Lehrerbildung. In A. Wellensiek (Eds.). Interdisziplinäres Lehren und Lernen in der Lehrerbildung. Perspektiven für innovative Ausbildungskonzepte (S. 17–29). Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.
Dilling, F., Holten, K., & Krause, E. (2019). Explikation möglicher inhaltlicher Forschungsgegenstände für eine wissenschaftskollaboration der Mathematik- und Physikdidaktik - Eine vergleichende Inhaltsanalyse aktueller deutschsprachiger Handbücher und Tagungsbände. Mathematica Didactica, 42, 1-18.
Đỗ, H. T. (2006). Lô gic học trong dạy học Vật lí. Hanoi. Vietnam: University of Education Publishing House.
Đỗ, H. T. (2012). Các kiểu tổ chức dạy học hiện đại trong dạy học vật lí ở trường phổ thông 2nd Edition. Hanoi, Vietnam: University of Education Publishing House.
Đỗ, H. T. (2014). Lamap một phương pháp dạy học hiện đại – Cơ sở lí luận và việc vận dụng trong dạy học 2nd Editon. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam National University Press.
Đỗ, H. T., Nguyễn, V. B., Trần, K. N., Trần, T. N., Trần, T. T. T., ... Nguyễn, V. B. H. (2016). Dạy học tích hợp phát triển năng lực học sinh - khoa học tự nhiên. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam National University Press.
Đỗ, H. T., Nguyễn, V. B., Tưởng, D. H., Dương, X. Q., & Trần, B. T. (2019). Dạy học phát triển năng lực môn vật lí trung học phổ thông. Hanoi, Vietnam: University of Education Publishing House.
Doig, B., Williams, J., Swanson, D., Borromeo Ferri, R., & Drake, P. (2019). Interdisciplinary Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6.
Duit, R. (2015). Alltagsvorstellungen und Physik lernen. In E. Kircher, R. Girwidz, & P. Häußler (Eds.), Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 657–680). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0_22.
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x.
Euler, M., Schüttler, T., & Hausamann, D. (2015). Schülerlabore: Lernen durch Forschen und Entwickeln. In E. Kircher, R. Girwidz, & P. Häußler (Eds.). Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 759-782). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0_26.
Fischler, H. (2015). Aus- und Fortbildung von Physiklehrkräften. In E. Kircher, R. Girwidz, & P. Häußler (Eds.). Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 681-704). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0_23.
Friege, G. (2001). Wissen und Problemlösen. Eine empirische Untersuchung des wissenszentrierten Problemlösens im Gebiet der Elektrizitätslehre auf der Grundlage des Experten-Novizen-Vergleich. Berlin: Logos-Verlag.
Friege, G., & Lind, G. (2006). Types and Qualities of Knowledge and their Relations to Problem Solving in Physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 437-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9013-8.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Routledge.
Galili, I. (2018). Physics and Mathematics as Interwoven Disciplines in Science Education. Science & Education, 27, 7-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9958-y.
Girwidz, R. (2015a). Medien im Physikunterricht. In E. Kircher, R. Girwidz, & P. Häußler (Eds.). Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 193-246). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0_6.
Girwidz, R. (2015b). Neue Medien und Multimedia. In E. Kircher, R. Girwidz, & P. Häußler (Eds.). Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 401-428). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0_12.
Greefrath, G., Oldenburg, R., Siller, H. -S., Ulm, V., & Weigand, H. -G. (2016): Aspects and „Grundvorstellungen” of the Concepts of Derivative and Integral. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 37(1), 99-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-016-0100-x.
Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19, 3-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338859.
Hà, T. T. L. (2016). Những vấn đề về khả năng diễn đạt trong dạy học vật lí của người học. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 17-21.
Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (2012, Eds.). Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education. The 19th ICMI Study. Dordrecht et al.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6.
Hattie, J., & Beywl, W. (2013). Lernen sichtbar machen. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verlag.
Hayden, M., & Thiep, L. Q. (2015). A 2020 Vision for Higher Education in Vietnam. International Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2006.44.7913.
Heering, P. (2013). Der Elektrische Salon: Physikgeschichte. Phy-DidB – Didaktik der Physik, Beitrag DD 17.47.
Heinrich, F., Bruder, R., & Bauer, C. (2015). Problemlösen lernen. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 279-301). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_10.
Heuling, L. (2015). Heterogene Lernvoraussetzungen in naturwissenschaftlichen Bildungsprozessen. Phy-DidB – Didaktik der Physik, Beitrag DD 02.20.
Ho, T. M. P (2018). A Study on Difficulties of Grade 10 Students in Integrating Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge on Quadratic Equations to Solve Realistic Problems. Proceeding of the international conference in mathematics education: An integrated approach in mathematics education and teacher training.
Hoang, C. K., & Phan, T. T. (2015). Phát triển năng lực dạy học theo yêu cầu đổi mới giáo dục cho sinh viên sư phạm Toán thông qua các môn khoa học cơ bản. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Höttecke, D., & Rieß, F. (2007). Rekonstruktion der Vorstellungen von Physikstudierenden über die Natur der Naturwissenschaften – eine explorative Studie. Physik und Didaktik in Schule und Hochschule, PhyDid A, 6(1), 1-14.
Jahnke, H. N., & Ufer, S. (2015). Argumentieren und Beweisen. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebecker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 331-357). Berlin, Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_12.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Designing Argumentation Learning Environments. In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education (pp. 91-117). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_5.
Jörissen, S., & Schmidt-Thieme, B. (2015). Darstellen und Kommunizieren. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 385-408). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_14.
Jürgensen, F. (2012). Das integrierte Fach Naturwissenschaften und seine Beliebtheit bei Lehrern und Schülern. In E. Rossa (Eds.), Chemie-Didaktik. Praxishandbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II (pp. 197-230). Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.
Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Borromeo Ferri, R. & Greefrath, G. (2015). Anwendungen und Modellieren. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 357-383). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_13.
Kircher, E., Girwidz, R., & Häußler, P. (2015). Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Klinger, W. (1989). Bildung physikalischer Begriffe und ihre Vermittlung im Unterricht. In W. B. Schneider (Eds.). Wege in der Physikdidaktik. Band 1. Sammlung aktueller Beiträge aus der physikdidaktischen Forschung (pp. 19-29). Erlangen: Palm & Enke. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0.
KMK (2004). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Beschluss vom 16.12.2003 i.d.F. vom 12.06.2014. Kultusministerkonferenz 16.12.2004.
Kraus, S., Krause, E., & Dilling, F. (2018). Inter-TeTra – A German-Vietnamese project combining physics and mathematics didactics. Vietnam Journal of Education, 2(5), 1-8.
Krause, E. (2013). Das Erhaltungsprinzip in der Physik und seine Anwendung im Physikunterricht. Dissertation an der Universität Siegen.
Krause, E. (2015). Nutzen von fächerverbindender Didaktik am Beispiel von subjektiven Lernvoraussetzungen im Mathematik- und Physikunterricht. Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht, 48, 492-495.
Krause, E. (2016). Die Übergangsproblematik von der Schule zur Hochschule im Fach Physik aus lerntheoretischer Sicht. PhyDid B – Didaktik der Physik – Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung, Beitrag DD 08.04.
Krause, E. (2017a): Physikdidaktik in der Mathematiklehrerbildung? Anregungen zur fachdidaktischverbindenden Lehrerbildung. Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht, 50.
Krause, E. (2017b). Mathematikdidaktik in der Physiklehrerbildung? Projekte zur fachdidaktisch-verbindenden Lehrerbildung. PhyDid B – Didaktik der Physik – Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung, Beitrag DD 5.4.
Krause, E. (2017c): Einsteins EJASE-Modell als Ausgangspunkt physikdidaktischer Forschungsfragen – Anregungen aus einem Modell zur Natur der Naturwissenschaft. Physik und Didaktik in Schule und Hochschule (PhyDid A), 16(1), 57-66.
Krause, E. (2018). Epistemological Parallels between Mathematics in School and Physics. Vietnam Journal of Education, 2(5), 14-20.
Krause, E., Bien, N. V., Chat, T. N., Chi, N. P., Dilling, F., Geppert, J., … Tho, C. C. (2019). Inter TeTra – Interdisciplinary Teacher Training with Mathematics and Physics. Description of a Project Partnership between Siegen (Germany) and Hanoi National University of Education (Vietnam). Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Krauthausen, G. (2018). Einführung in die Mathematikdidaktik – Grundschule. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54692-5.
Labudde, P. (2014). Fächerübergreifender naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht – Mythen, Definitionen, Fakten. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 20(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-014-0001-9.
Labudde, P. (Hrsg.) (2008). Naturwissenschaften vernetzen - Horizonte erweitern: Fächerübergreifender Unterricht konkret. Seelze-Velber: Klett/Kallmeyer.
Lamprecht, X. (2017). Erfassung der konnotativen Überzeugungen von Lehramtsstudierenden zur Mathematik als Wissenschaft und als Schulfach. In U. Kortenkamp, & A. Kuzle (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2017 (pp. 593-596). Münster: WTM.
Lê, C. T., & Lê, T. T. (2004). Phân tích chương trình vật lí phổ thông. Hue, Vietnam: University of Hue Publishing House.
Le, V. H. (2015). Chuẩn bị của sinh viên sư phạm nhằm phát triển năng lực sử dụng ngôn ngữ Toán học của học sinh trong dạy học môn Toán ở trường phổ thông. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Lengnink, K., & Roth, J. (2017). Lernprozesse in Lehr-Lern-Laboren Mathematik. In Kortenkamp, U. & Kuzle, A. (Hrsg.). Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2017 (pp. 1267-1268). Münster: WTM.
Leuders, T. (2015). Aufgaben in Forschung und Praxis. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 435-460). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_16.
Leuders, T. (Eds.) (2003). Mathematik Didaktik. Praxishandbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Loos, A., & Ziegler, M, (2015). Gesellschaftliche Bedeutung der Mathematik. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebecker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 3-18). Berlin, Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.
Mai, H. P., & Ngô, M. N. (2016). Thiết kế bộ cảm biến kết nối không dây với máy vi. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 68-75.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim. Basel: Beltz.
McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (2002). Science & Technology Education Library. The Nature of Science in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47215-5.
Meyer, M. (2012). Vom Satz zum Begriff. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.
Meyer, M., & Voigt, J. (2008). Entdecken mit latenter Beweisidee – Analyse von Schulbuchseiten. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339057.
Michelsen, C. (1998). Expanding Context and Domain: A Cross-Curricular Activity in Mathematics and Physics. ZDM, 30, 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653149.
Mikelskis, H. (Ed.) (2006). Physik Didaktik. Praxishandbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Mikelskis-Seifert, S. (Ed.) (2011). Modelle. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht Physik 122.
Mikelskis-Seifert, S., & Kasper, L. (2011). Modellieren in der Physik, im Alltag und im Unterricht. Hintergründe und unterrichtliche Orientierung zum Thema Modelle. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht. Physik, 122, 4-12.
Moegling, K. (2010). Kompetenzaufbau im fächerübergreifenden Unterricht: Förderung vernetzten Denkens und komplexen Handelns. Didaktische Grundlagen, Modelle und Unterrichtsbeispiele für die Sekundarstufen I und II. Immenhausen bei Kassel: Prolog-Verl.
MOET (Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training) (2018). School Educational Curriculum: The General Curriculum. Retrieved on 13 May 2019 from https://data.moet.gov.vn/index.php/s/LETzPhj5sGGnDii#pdfviewer.
MOET (Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training) (2018). School Educational Curriculum: The Mathematics Curriculum,.
Müller, A. (2015). Astronomie im Unterricht. In Kircher, E., Girwidz, R. & Häußler, P. (Eds.). Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 529-552). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0_17.
Neumann, I., Heinze, A., Ufer, S., & Neumann, K. (2011). Modellieren aus mathematischer und physikalischer Perspektive. Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht, 603-607.
Nguyen V. B. (2015). Developing and teaching multidisciplinary topics in science integrated. Journal of Science of HNUE, 60(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2015-0031.
Nguyen V. B., & Thanh H. N. (2014). Integrierter Naturwissenschaftenunterricht. Educational Equipment Magazine, 110.
Nguyen, A. Q. (2018). Integrated Teaching of Parametric Equations of Straight Line to Tenth-Graders in High School With Geogebra. Proceeding of the international conference in mathematics education: An integrated approach in mathematics education and teacher training.
Nguyen, B. K. (2017). Phương pháp dạy học môn Toán. Hanoi: The HNUE Publishing House.
Nguyen, B. K., Dinh, N. C., Nguyen, M. C., Vu, D. T., & Nguyen, V. T (1994). Phương pháp dạy học môn Toán. Phần 2: Dạy học những nội dung cơ bản. Hanọi: The Vietnamese Educational Publishing House.
Nguyễn, Đ. T., & Nguyễn, N. H. (2001). Tổ chức hoạt động nhận thức cho học sinh trong dạy học vật lí ở trường phổ thông 2nd Editon. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam National University Press.
Nguyễn, Đ. T., Nguyễn, N. H., & Phạm, X. Q. (2002). Phương pháp dạy học vật lí ở trường phổ thông. Hanoi, Vietnam: University of Education Publishing House.
Nguyễn, M. H. (2016). Dạy học tích hợp chủ đề “Năng lượng gió và sử dụng năng lượng gió” nhằm phát triển năng lực giải quyết vấn đề của học sinh trung học cơ sở. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 100-107.
Nguyen, P. C (2016). Vì sao nên dạy học Toán theo hướng tích hợp? Educational Science Journal, 2016(1), 13-15.
Nguyen, P. C., & Nguyen, T. H. P. (2019). Teaching mathematics at the high school level in an integrated way through interdisciplinary projects. HNUE project in education.
Nguyen, P. C., Ngo, T. T. Q., & Nguyen, T. H. P. (2018). Teaching mathematics at the high school level in an integrated way. Vietnam Journal of Education, 2(5), 21-27.
Nguyen, T. N. (2013). Selling western dreams: Australian transnational education in Vietnam and the formation of students’ identities. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/58869696EC94A.
Nguyễn, T. T., & Đỗ, H. T. (2016) Dạy học Vật lí theo quan điểm của Lamap nhằm phát triển năng lực giải quyết vấn đề cho học sinh. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 226-234.
Nguyễn, V. B., & Trần, N. C. (2018). Đề xuất mô hình hoạt động của trung tâm STEM tại trường sư phạm. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 07-12.
Nguyen, V. B., Tuong, D. H., Tran, M. D., Nguyen, V. H., Chu, C. T., Nguyen, A. T., … Doan, V. T. (2019). Giáo dục STEM trong nhà trường phổ thông. Hanoi: The Vietnamese Educational Publishing House.
Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What Teachers of Science Need to Know about Models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191.
Opitz, E. M., & Nührenbörger, M. (2015). Diagnostik und Leistungsbeurteilung. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebecker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 491-512). Berlin, Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_18.
Pehkonen, E., & Pietilä, A. (2004). On relationships between beliefs and knowledge in mathematics education. European Research in Mathematics Education III: Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/proceed-ings/Groups/TG2/TG2_pehkonen_cerme3.pdf.
Phạm, H. T. (2001). Lí luận dạy học vật lí ở trường trung học. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Phạm, H. T. (2007). Dạy học vật lí ở trường phổ thông theo định hướng phát triển hoạt động học tích cực, tự chủ, sáng tạo và tư duy khoa học. Hanoi, Vietnam: University of Education Publishing House.
Pham, S. N, Hoa, A. T., Ha, X. T., & Mai, X. V. (2015). Một số định hướng trong dạy học phân hóa môn Toán ở trường Trung học phổ thông nhằm phát triển năng lực học sinh. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Pham, S. N., Do, T. D, & Le, H. T. (2018a). Orientations for Building Learning Situations in Mathematics to Link the Competency of Mathematical Problem Solving to Real Life. Proceeding of the international conference in mathematics education: An integrated approach in mathematics education and teacher training.
Pham, S. N., Le, H. T., & Do, T. D. (2018b). Some Practical Directions in Using Mathematical Software in the New Mathematics Curriculum for High Schools in Vietnam. Proceeding of the international conference in mathematics education: An integrated approach in mathematics education and teacher training.
Pham, X. C. (2015). Phát triển năng lực đánh giá kết quả học tập cho sinh viên ngành sư phạm Toán thông qua dạy học các học phần nghiệp vụ sư phạm. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Phạm, X. Q., & Lê, V. T. S. (2018). Phát triển năng lực giải quyết vấn đề của học sinh thông qua tổ chức hoạt động ngoại khóa về các ứng dụng kĩ thuật của vật lí thuộc chương chất khí – Vật lí lớp 10. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 98-103.
Phan, T. P. T. (2015). The competence of instructing students to self-study concepts in teaching mathematics at secondary schools. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Philipp, K. (2013). Experimentelles Denken. Theoretische und empirische Konkretisierung einer mathematischen Kompetenz. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01120-8.
Philipp, K. (2015). Kinder experimentieren mit Zahlen – Eine mathematische Tätigkeit unter der Lupe. In F. Caluori, H. Linneweber-Lammerskitten, & C. Streit (Hrsg.) Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2015 (34-41). Münster: WTM.
Polya, G. (1949). Schule des Denkens. Vom Lösen mathematischer Probleme. Tübingen: Francke.
Rehm, M., Bünder, W., Haas, T., Buck, P., Labudde, P., Brovelli, D., … Svoboda, G. (2008). Legitimationen und Fundamente eines integrierten Unterrichtsfachs Science. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 14, 99-123.
Reiss, K., & Hammer, C. (2013). Grundlagen der Mathematikdidaktik. Basel: Birkhäuder. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0647-9.
Rincke, K., & Leisen, J. (2015). Sprache im Physikunterricht. In E. Kircher, R. Girwidz, & P. Häußler (Eds.). Physikdidaktik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 636-655). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41745-0_21.
Ríordáin, M. N., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2016). Making mathematics and science integration happen: key aspects of practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1078001.
Roetger, R., & Wodzinski, R. (2017). Wie fachspezifisch ist das Naturwissenschaftsverständnis? PhyDid B – Didaktik der Physik – Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung, Beitrag DD 09.02.
Rott, B., Groß Ophoff, J., & Leuders, T. (2017). Erfassung der konnotativen Überzeugungen von Lehramtsstudierenden zur Mathematik als Wissenschaft und als Schulfach. In U. Kortenkamp, & A. Kuzle (Eds.) Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2017 (1101-1104). Münster: WTM.
Rott, B., Leuders, T., & Stahl, E. (2015). Assessment of Mathematical Competencies and Epistemic Cognition of Pre-Service Teachers. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000198.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem-solving. Orlando: Academic.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a Theory of Teaching-in-Context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7.
Schorcht, S. (2017). Von Anamaya bis John Neper – Mathematikgeschichte in Schulbüchern der Grundschule. In U. Kortenkamp, & A. Kuzle (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2017 (pp. 869-872). Münster: WTM.
Sevinc, S., & Lesh, R. (2018). Training mathematics teachers for realistic math problems: a case of modeling-based teacher education courses. ZDM, 50(1-2), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0898-9.
Söhling, A. C. (2015). Problemlösen – Mittels Irrtümern zu strukturellen Erkenntnissen. Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2015.
Struve, H. (2015). Zur geschichtlichen Entwicklung der Mathematikdidaktik als wissenschaftlicher Disziplin. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebecker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 539-566). Berlin, Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_20.
Thinh, T. B. T. (2014). Symbolized method in teaching analysis concepts in the Vietnamese high schools. Proceeding of the national conference of research on mathematics education in the orientation of developing learners’ competencies for the period 2014-2020.
Tran, K. (2015). Về mục tiêu môn Toán trong trường phổ thông Việt nam. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Tran, L. T., & Marginson, S. (2018b). Internationalisation of Vietnamese Higher Education: Possibilities, Challenges and Implications. In L. T. Tran, & S. Marginson (Eds.), Higher Education Dynamics. Internationalisation in Vietnamese Higher Education (pp. 253–257). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78492-2_14.
Tran, L. T., & Marginson, S. (Eds.). (2018a). Higher Education Dynamics. Internationalisation in Vietnamese Higher Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78492-2.
Trần, N. C. (2013). Die Bedeutung von Wasserkraftwerken für die zukünftige Energieversorgung Vietnams - Vorstellung eines Konzepts für den Schulunterricht. PhyDid B, 2013(1), 1-7.
Trần, N. C. (2016). Tương tự trong nghiên cứu và trong dạy học vật lí. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 57-67.
Trần, N. C., & Kraus, S. (2017). Eingestrahlte Sonnenenergie auf eine Dachschräge. Von den theoretischen Grundlagen zum Modellexperiment. Der mathematischen und naturwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts, 2017(1), 32-35.
Trần, N. C., & Krause, E. (2017). Herleitung der Sonnenscheinformel und Bestimmung der eingestrahlten Sonnenenergie durch Koordinatentransformationen als fächerverbindender Lehrinhalt. Der Mathematikunterricht, 2017(5), 50-56.
Tran, T., & Nguyen, N.G.(2015). Sử dụng sách điện tử hỗ trợ việc giải bài tập hình học phẳng theo hướng phân nhánh. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Tran, T., Phan, A. H., & Nguyen, T. H. (2014). Ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin trong dạy học Toán theo hướng phát triển năng lực của học sinh phổ thông. Proceeding of the national conference of research on mathematics education in the orientation of developing learners’ competencies for the period 2014-2020.
Tran, V. (2018). Bringing Mathematics Education into the Global Orbit to Develop Thinking, Logic and Creativity in Solving Realistic Problems with Closed-Open Approach. Proceeding of the international conference in mathematics education: An integrated approach in mathematics education and teacher training.
Trần, V. T. (2010). Rèn luyện tư duy phê phán và tư duy sáng tạo của học sinh trong dạy học vật lí thông qua dạy học dự án. Proceeding of Vietnam national conference for physics teaching, 133-138.
Treacy, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2014). Authentic Integration: a model for integrating mathematics and science in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868543.
Ufer, S., Heinze, A., & Lipowsky, F. (2015). Unterrichtsmethoden und Instruktionsstrategien. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebecker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 411-434). Berlin, Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_15.
Vo, X. M. (2018). Developing Students’Mathematical Intuitive Competence Based on Learning Meaningful Knowledge in Mathematics Education. Proceeding of the international conference in mathematics education: An integrated approach in mathematics education and teacher training.
Vollrath, H.-J. (1984). Methodik des Begriffslehrens. Stuttgart: Klett.
Vom Hofe, R. (1992). Grundvorstellungen mathematischer Inhalte als didaktisches Modell. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 13(4), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338785.
Vom Hofe, R., Lotz, J., & Salle, A. (2015). Analysis: Leitidee Zuordnung und Veränderung. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebecker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 149-184). Berlin, Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_6.
Vu, T. B. (2015). Năng lực biểu diễn Toán học của học sinh Trung học cơ sở và những lưu ý trong đào tạo sinh viên sư phạm Toán. Proceeding of the conference of developing professional competencies for Vietnamese school mathematics teachers.
Weigand, H.-G. (2015). Begriffsbildung. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme, & H.-G. Weigand (Eds.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 255-278). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35119-8_9.
Wellensiek, A. (Hrsg.) (2002). Interdisziplinäres Lehren und Lernen in der Lehrerbildung: Perspektiven für innovative Ausbildungskonzepte.Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.
Whitney, K., Reid, L., & Streitwieser, B. (2018). Vietnam and Higher Education Internationalization: The Promise of Community Colleges. In R. Latiner Raby, & E. J. Valeau (Eds.), Springer International Handbooks of Education. Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts (Vol. 2013, pp. 541-553). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50911-2_19.
Wiesner, H., Schecker, H., & Hopf, M. (2011). Physikdidaktik kompakt. Hallbergmoos: Aulis.
Witzke, I., & Spies, S. (2016). Domain-Specific Beliefs of School Calculus. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 37(1), 131-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-016-0106-4.
Zech, F. (2002). Grundkurs Mathematikdidaktik. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.

How to cite this article

APA

Krause, E., Dilling, F., Kraus, S. F., Chi, N. P., Chat, T. N., & Bien, N. V. (2020). Relevant Content for a Scientific Collaboration in Mathematics and Physics Education Research - A Comparative Content Analysis of Handbooks and Conference Proceedings in Germany and Vietnam. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1836. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114097

Vancouver

Krause E, Dilling F, Kraus SF, Chi NP, Chat TN, Bien NV. Relevant Content for a Scientific Collaboration in Mathematics and Physics Education Research - A Comparative Content Analysis of Handbooks and Conference Proceedings in Germany and Vietnam. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(4):em1836. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114097

AMA

Krause E, Dilling F, Kraus SF, Chi NP, Chat TN, Bien NV. Relevant Content for a Scientific Collaboration in Mathematics and Physics Education Research - A Comparative Content Analysis of Handbooks and Conference Proceedings in Germany and Vietnam. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(4), em1836. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114097

Chicago

Krause, Eduard, Frederik Dilling, Simon Friedrich Kraus, Nguyen Phuong Chi, Tran Ngoc Chat, and Nguyen Van Bien. "Relevant Content for a Scientific Collaboration in Mathematics and Physics Education Research - A Comparative Content Analysis of Handbooks and Conference Proceedings in Germany and Vietnam". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 4 (2020): em1836. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114097

Harvard

Krause, E., Dilling, F., Kraus, S. F., Chi, N. P., Chat, T. N., and Bien, N. V. (2020). Relevant Content for a Scientific Collaboration in Mathematics and Physics Education Research - A Comparative Content Analysis of Handbooks and Conference Proceedings in Germany and Vietnam. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1836. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114097

MLA

Krause, Eduard et al. "Relevant Content for a Scientific Collaboration in Mathematics and Physics Education Research - A Comparative Content Analysis of Handbooks and Conference Proceedings in Germany and Vietnam". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 4, 2020, em1836. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114097