Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alshehri, K. A., & Youssef, N. H. (2022). The influence of mathematical knowledge for teaching towards elementary teachers’ mathematical self-efficacy. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), em2118. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12086
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Batanero, C., Begué, N., Borovcnik, M., & Gea, M. (2020). Ways in which high school students understand the sampling distribution for proportions. Statistics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v19i3.55
• Begué, N., Batanero, C., & Gea, M. M. (2018). Comprensión del valor esperado y variabilidad de la proporción muestral por estudiantes de educación secundaria obligatoria [Understanding the expected value and variability of the sample proportion by compulsory secondary education students]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 36(2), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2256
• Begué, N., Batanero, C., Ruiz, K., & Gea, M. M. (2019). Understanding sampling: A summary of the research. Boletín de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, 35(1), 49-78.
• Berkovitz, J. (2015). The propensity interpretation of probability: A re-evaluation. Erkenn, 80(Suppl 3), 629-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9716-8
• Briand, J. (2005). Une expérience statistique et une première approche des lois du hasard au lycée par une confrontation avec une machine simple [A statistical experiment and a first approach to the laws of chance in high school through a confrontation with a simple machine]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques [Research in Didactics of Mathematics], 25(2), 247-281.
• Burrill, G. & Biehler, R. (2011). Fundamental statistical ideas in the school curriculum and in training teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics. Challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 57-69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0
• Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001
• Eichler, A., & Vogel, M. (2014). Three approaches for modelling situations with randomness. In E. J. Chernoff, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking, presenting plural perspectives (pp. 75-99). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_4
• Erbas, A. K., & Ocal, M. F. (2022). Students’ intuitively-based (mis) conceptions in probability and teachers’ awareness of them: the case of heuristics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2128454
• Gauvrit N., & Morsanyi K. (2014). The equiprobability bias from a mathematical and psychological perspective. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 10(4), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0163-9
• Gómez-Torres, E., Batanero, C., & Díaz, C. (2016). Developing a questionnaire to assess the probability content knowledge of prospective primary school teachers. Statistics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v15i2.248
• Green, D. R. (1983). A survey of probabilistic concepts in 3000 pupils aged 11-16 years. En D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett, & G. M. Constable (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 766-783). Teaching Statistics Trust.
• Harradine, A., Batanero, C., & Rossman, A. (2011). Students and teachers’ knowledge of sampling and inference. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics. Challenges for teaching and teacher education (235–246). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0
• Heitele, D. (1975). An epistemological view on fundamental stochastic ideas. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6, 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302543
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3
• Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 59-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_3
• Koparan, T. (2022). The impact of a game and simulation-based probability learning environment on the achievement and attitudes of prospective teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(9), 2319-2337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1868592
• Kula, F., & Kocer, R. G. (2020). Why is it difficult to understand statistical inference? Reflections on the opposing directions of construction and application of inference framework. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 39(4), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrz014
• Langer, E. J. (1982). The illusion of control. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristic and biases (pp. 231-238). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
• Lecoutre, M. P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in “purely random” situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540060
• Llinares, S. (2018). Mathematics teacher’s knowledge, knowledge-based reasoning, and contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9399-1
• Llinares, S. (2021). Instructional quality of mathematics teaching and mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09488-2
• López-Martín, M. M, Batanero, C., Díaz-Batanero, C., & Gea, M. M. (2016). La inferencia estadística en las pruebas de acceso a la universidad en Andalucía [Statistical inference in university entrance exams in Andalusia]. Revista Paranaense de Educação Matemática, 5(8), 33-59. https://doi.org/10.33871/22385800.2016.5.8.33-59
• López-Martín, M. D. M., Batanero, C., & Gea, M. M. (2019). ¿Conocen los futuros profesores los errores de sus estudiantes en la inferencia estadística? [Do future teachers know the errors of their students in statistical inference?]. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 33, 672-693. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v33n64a11
• Lugo-Armenta, J. G., & Pino-Fan, L.R. (2021). Inferential statistical reasoning of math teachers: Experiences in virtual contexts generated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11, 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070363
• Makar, K. & Rubin, A. (2018). Learning about statistical inference. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 261-294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_8
• MEFP. (2022a). Real Decreto 157/2022, de 1 de Marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la educación primaria [Royal Decree 157/2022, of March 1, which establishes the organization and minimum teaching of primary education]. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional [Ministry of Education and Vocational Training].
• MEFP. (2022b). Real Decreto 217/2022, de 29 de Marzo, por el que se establece la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la educación secundaria obligatoria [Royal Decree 217/2022, of March 29, which establishes the organization and minimum teaching of compulsory secondary education]. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional [Ministry of Education and Vocational Training].
• Peirce, C. S. (1932). Notes on the doctrine of chances. In C. S. Peirce (Ed.), Collected papers (pp. 404-414). Harvard University Press.
• Phelps, G., Howell, H., & Liu, S. (2020). Exploring differences in mathematical knowledge for teaching for prospective and practicing teachers. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52(2), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01097-x
• Ping, C., Schellings, G., & Beijaard, D. (2018). Teacher educators’ professional learning: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.003
• Saldanha, L., & Thompson, P. (2002). Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statistical inference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(3), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023692604014
• Savard, A. (2010). Simulating the risk without gambling: Can student conceptions generate critical thinking about probability? In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8^th International Conference on Teaching Statistics. International Statistical Institute.
• Scheiner, T., Montes, M. A., Godino, J. D., Carrillo, J., & Pino-Fan, L. R. (2019). What makes mathematics teacher knowledge specialized? Offering alternative views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9859-6
• Shaughnessy, J. M., Ciancetta, M., & Canada, D. (2004). Types of student reasoning on sampling tasks. In M. Johnsen-Høines, & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 177-184). PME.
• Suárez, M. (2020). Philosophy of probability and statistical modelling. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108985826
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
• Valenzuela-Ruiz, S., Batanero, C., Begué, N., & Garzón-Guerrero, J. A. (2023). Conocimiento didáctico-matemático sobre la distribución de la media muestral de profesorado de bachillerato en formación [Didactic-mathematical knowledge about the distribution of the sample mean of high school teachers in training]. Uniciencia, 37(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-1.3
• Wu, C., & Thompson, M. E. (2020). Sampling theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44246-0
• Valenzuela-Ruiz, S., Batanero, C., Begué, N. & Garzón-Guerrero, J. A. (2023). Conocimiento didáctico-matemático sobre la distribución de la media muestral de profesorado de bachillerato en formación. Uniciencia, 37(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-1.3
• Yarritu, I., Matute, H., & Vadillo, M. A. (2014). Illusion of control: The role of personal involvement. Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000225

APA

Begué, N., Batanero, C., Gea, M. M., & Valenzuela-Ruiz, S. M. (2023). Prospective secondary school teachers’ knowledge of sampling distribution properties. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2265. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13159

Vancouver

Begué N, Batanero C, Gea MM, Valenzuela-Ruiz SM. Prospective secondary school teachers’ knowledge of sampling distribution properties. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(5):em2265. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13159

AMA

Begué N, Batanero C, Gea MM, Valenzuela-Ruiz SM. Prospective secondary school teachers’ knowledge of sampling distribution properties. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(5), em2265. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13159

Chicago

Begué, Nuria, Carmen Batanero, María Magdalena Gea, and Silvia María Valenzuela-Ruiz. "Prospective secondary school teachers’ knowledge of sampling distribution properties". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 5 (2023): em2265. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13159

Harvard

Begué, N., Batanero, C., Gea, M. M., and Valenzuela-Ruiz, S. M. (2023). Prospective secondary school teachers’ knowledge of sampling distribution properties. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2265. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13159

MLA

Begué, Nuria et al. "Prospective secondary school teachers’ knowledge of sampling distribution properties". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 5, 2023, em2265. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13159