Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Allen B. A. & Armour-Thomas, E. (1991). Constract validation of metacognition. The Journal of Psychology, 127(2), 203−211.
• Birgin, O. & Baki, A. (2007). The use of portfolio to assess student‟s performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2): 75−90.
• Birgin, O. (2011). Pre-service mathematics teachers‟ views on the use of portfolios in their education as an alternative assessment method. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(11), 710−721.
• Black, P. (1999). Assessment, learning theories, and learning systems. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, Learning, and Assessment (pp. 118–134). London, UK: Paul Chapman.
• Brown, S. & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing Learners in Higher Education. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
• Burns, N. (1995). Writing in Math Class. White Plains, NY: Cuisenaire.
• Cathcart, W. G., Pothier, Y. M, Vance, J. H., & Bezuk, N. S. (2001). Learning Mathematics in Elementary and Middle Schools. 2 nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merril and Prentice-Hall.
• Chang, C. C. & Chou, P. P. (2011). Effects of reflection category and reflection quality on learning outcomes during web-based portfolio assessment process: a Aase study of high school students in computer application course. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 101–114.
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Batista, M. J. (1998). Develeopment of concept of geometric figures in a specially designed Logo computer environment. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 20(2&3), 47−64.
• Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatly, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 3–29.
• Cole, K. B. & Struyk, L. R. (1997). Portfolio assessment: Challenges in secondary education. High School Journal, 80(4), 261–273.
• Coxford, A., Usiskin, Z., & Hirshchhorn, D. (1991). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project: Geometry. Sunnyvale, CA: Scott, Foresman and Co.
• Craine, T. V. & Rubenstein, R. (1993). A quadrilateral hierarchy to facilitate learning in geometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 86(1), 30−36.
• Dandis, M. A. (2013). The assessment methods that are used in a secondary mathematics class. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 4(2), 133–143.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic Assessment in Action. New York, NY: Teachers College.
• Davies, A. & Le Mahieu, P. (2003). Assessment for learning: reconsidering portfolios and research evidence. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Innovation and Change in Professional Education: Optimizing New Modes of Assessment. In Search of Qualities and Standards (p. 141–169). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• De Fina, A. A. (1992). Portfolio Assessment: Getting Started. Scholastic Inc.: New York, NY.
• Dietiker, L. (Ed.) (1997a). College Preparatory Mathematics 1. Vol. 1, 2nd Ed. CPM Educational Program.
• Dietiker, L. (Ed.) (1997b). College Preparatory Mathematics 1. Vol. 2, 2nd Ed. CPM Educational Program.
• MoE (Ethiopian Ministry of Education) (2006). Higher Diploma Programme for Teacher Educators. Unpublished Handbook, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
• Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Justin, P. A. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(2), 1–18.
• Gardner, H. (1999). Assessment in context. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, Learning, and Assessment (pp. 90–117). London: Paul Chapman.
• George, J. & Cowan, J. (2004). A Handbook of Techniques for Formative Evaluation. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
• Georghiades, P. (2000). Beyond conceptual change learning: Focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition. Educational Research, 42(2), 119–139.
• Gutierrez, A. & Jaime, A. (1998). On the assessment of the van Hiele levels of reasoning. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 20(2&3), 27−46.
• Hassmen, P., Sams, M. R., & Hunt, D. P. (1996). Self-assessment responding and testing methods: Effects on performers and observers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 1091–1104.
• Hoey, B. & Wotton, K. (1994a). College Preparatory Mathematics 2: Geometry (Unit 1–6). Lodi, California: CPM Educational Program.
• Hoey, B. & Wotton, K. (1994b). College Preparatory Mathematics 2: Geometry (Unit 7–12). Lodi, California: CPM Educational Program.
• Huetinck, L. & Munshin, S. N. (2000). Teaching Mathematics in the 21st Century: Methods and Activities for Grades 6–12. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill and Prentice Hall.
• ICMI (International Commission on Mathematical Instruction) (1995). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer.
• Johnson, R. S., Mims-Cox, J. S., & Doyle-Nichols, A. (2006). Developing Portfolio in Education: a Guide to Reflection, Inquiry, and Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Jones, M. G. (1994). Assessment Potpourri: Science and Children. University of North Carolina at ChapelHill, Chapel-Hill, North Carolina.
• Jonsson, A. & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144.
• Julius, T. M. (2000). Third Grade Students’ Perceptions of Portfolios. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
• Kantrov, I. (2000). Issues in Mathematics Education: Assessing Students’ Mathematics Learning. Educational Development Center, Inc.
• Kuhs, T. M. (1994). Portfolio assessment: Making it work the first time. Mathematics Teacher, 87(50), 332–335.
• Kyriacou, C. (1998). Essential Teaching Skills. 2nd Ed. Cheltenham, UK: Nelson Thrones.
• Lambdin, D. V. & Walker, V. L. (1994). Planning for classroom portfolio assessment. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(6), 318–324.
• Lee, F. & Silverman, F. L. (2001). Using portfolio assessment to assess children of diverse language and cultural background. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 32(2&3), 102–117.
• Lockhart, C. & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 45, 605–655.
• Mahalski, P. A. (1992). Essay-writing: Do study manuals give relevant advice? Higher Education 24(1), 113–132.
• Marin-Garcia. J. A., & Lloret., J. (2008). Improving teamwork with university engineering students. The effect of an assessment method to prevent shirking. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 1(5), 1–11.
• Marsh, C. J. (2004). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. 3rd Ed. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
• Melograno, V. J. (2000). Designing a portfolio system for K-12 physical education: a Step-by-step process. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 4(2), 97–116.
• Mires, G. J., Friedman Ben-David, M., Preece, P. E., & Smith, B. (2001) Educational benefits of student self-marking of short-answer questions. Medical Teacher, 23(5), 462–466.
• Movshoritz-Hadar, N., Inbar, S., & Zaslasky, O. (1986). Students‟ distortions of theorems. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 8(1), 49−57.
• NCTM (National Councils of Teachers of Mathematics). (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Councils of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NCTM. (1995). Assessment Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Councils of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Councils of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NRC (National Reserach Council). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Olaussen, B. S. & Braten, I. (1999). Students‟ use of strategies for self-regulated learning: Cross-cultural perspectives. Scand. Journal of Educational Research, 43(4), 409–432.
• Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (1997). A study in self-assessment: Tutor and students‟ perceptions of performance criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 357–369.
• Pollard, A. (2002). Reading for Reflective Thinking. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
• Posamentier, A. S. & Stepelman, J. (1996). Teaching Secondary School Mathematics: Techniques and Enrichment Units. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Purwanti, T. T. (2015). The implementation of self-assessment in writing class: a Case study at Stba Lia, Jakarta. TEFLIN Journal, 26(1), 97–115.
• Race, P., Brown, S., & Smith, B. (2005). {500 Tips} on Assessment. 2nd Ed. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
• Reichel, A. G. (1994). Performance assessment: Five practical approaches. Science and Children, 32(2), 21–25.
• Robinson, G. E. & Bartlet, K. T. (1993). Assessment and evaluation of learning. In D.T. Owens (Ed.), Research Ideas for The Classroom: Middle Grades of Mathematics (pp. 329–348). New York, NY: McMillan.
• Sambell, K., McDowell, L. & Brown, S. (1997). „But is it fair?‟ An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349–371.
• Santiago, F. & Spanos, G. (1993). Meeting the MCTM communication standards for all students. In G. Cuevas and M. Driscoll (Eds.), Reaching All Students With Mathematics (pp.133−145). Reston, VA: National Councils of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Sbhatu, D. B. (2006). Investigating the Effects of Metacognitive Instruction in Learning Primary School Science in Some Schools in Ethiopia. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
• Schmidt, M. E. & Bronsnan, P. A. (1996). Mathematics Assessment Practices Reporting Methods. Vol. 96, No. 1. Mansfield, OH: Ohio State University.
• Segers, M. & Dochy, F. (2001). New assessment forms in problem-based learning: the Value-added of the students‟ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327–343.
• Senk, S. L. (1989). van Hiele levels and achievement in writing geometry proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 309−321.
• Slater, T.F. (1996). Portfolio assessment strategies for grading first-year university physics student in the USA. Physics Education, 31, 82–86.
• Slauijsmans, D., Dochy, F., and Moerkerke, G. (1998). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a Review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.
• Somervell, H. (1996). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the Case for self, peer, and collaborative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(3): 221 – 233.
• Stallings-Roberts, V. (1994). Exploratory geometry: Let the students write the text. The Mathematics Teacher, 87(6), 403–408.
• Stenmark, J. K. (1989). Assessment Alternatives in Mathematics: an Overview Assessment Technique that Promotes Learning–EQUALS. Berkley, CA: University of California.
• Struyven, K., Dochy, P., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students‟ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a Review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 331–347.
• Taki, S. & Heidari, M. (2011). The effect of using portfolio-based writing assessment on language learning: the Case of young Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 192–199.
• Tanner, H. & Jones, S. (1994). Using peer and self-assessment to develop modeling skills with students aged 11 to 16: Socio-constructivist view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 413–431.
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.
• van de Walle, J.A. (1998). Elementary and Middle Schools Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. 3rd Ed. New York, NY: Longman.
• van den Berg, G. (2004). Use of assessment in the development of higher order thinking skills. African Education Review, 1(2), 279–294.
• Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19–36.
• VanLehn, K. A., Chi, M. T. H., Baggett, W., & Murray, R. C. (1995). Progress Report: Towards a Theory of Learning during Tutoring. Pittsburg: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburg.
• Webb, N. L. & Welsch, C. (1993). Assessment and evaluation for middle grades. In D.T. Owens (Ed.), Research Ideas for the Classroom: Middle Grades of Mathematics (pp. 299–316). New York, NY: McMillan.
• Weldeana, H. N. (2008). The Effect of Problem-Based Teaching and Learning on the Achievement of High School Mathematics Learners. MEd. Dissertation, UNISA, Pretoria.
• Weistein, C. E. & Palmer, D. (1990). LASSI-HS Manual. Cleanwater, FL: H&H Publishing.
• White, R. T. & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23, 21–37.
• Willcoxson, L. E. (2006). “It's not fair!” Assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork. Journal of Management Education, 30(6), 798–808.
• Williams, N. B. (2000). Journal writing in mathematics classroom: a Beginner‟s approach. The Mathematics Teacher, 93(2), 132–135.

APA

Weldeana, H. N., & Sbhatu, D. B. (2017). Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among Teacher Education College Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1981-2004. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a

Vancouver

Weldeana HN, Sbhatu DB. Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among Teacher Education College Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6):1981-2004. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a

AMA

Weldeana HN, Sbhatu DB. Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among Teacher Education College Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6), 1981-2004. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a

Chicago

Weldeana, Hailu Nigus, and Desta Berhe Sbhatu. "Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among Teacher Education College Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 6 (2017): 1981-2004. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a

Harvard

Weldeana, H. N., and Sbhatu, D. B. (2017). Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among Teacher Education College Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), pp. 1981-2004. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a

MLA

Weldeana, Hailu Nigus et al. "Portfolio of Evidence: An Assessment Tool in Promoting Geometry Achievement among Teacher Education College Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 6, 2017, pp. 1981-2004. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01210a