Out-of-school Activity: A Comparison of the Experiences of Rural and Urban Participants in Science Fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa

Sure Mupezeni; Jeanne Kriek

doi:10.29333/ejmste/92041

Full Text (PDF)

Sure Mupezeni ¹, Jeanne Kriek ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Institute for Science and Technology Education, University of South Africa, UNISA, SOUTH AFRICA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The paper compares the experiences of rural and urban learners who participate in Eskom Expo for Young Scientists science fairs in the Limpopo province of South Africa. Within an exploratory case study in the Limpopo province, a third-generation activity-theory framework was applied as an analytical tool to determine differences in activities between learners from rural and urban schools. To address triangulation, personal meaning mapping, interviews, focus-group discussions, and observations were used. The study involved eleven learners, six from rural schools and five from urban schools. Themes were identified to present the learners` view on science fairs and possible reasons for their performance or failure. The results revealed that the differences in activities of rural learners are due to: poor school facilities, lack of support, lack of mentors, lack of equipment, lack of computers and computer illiteracy. Two new areas are confirmed namely the level of attention with regards to learner`s engagement and readiness to learn and depth of knowledge of learners – factors that were not identified in previous studies on science fairs.

Keywords

activity theory
out-of-school activity
personal meaning mapping
science fair

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 14, Issue 8, August 2018, Article No: em1577

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041

Publication date: 07 Jun 2018

Article Views: 2546

Article Downloads: 1417

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adams, M., Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2003). Things change: Museums, learning, & research. In M. Xanthoudaki, L. Tickle, & V. Sekules (Eds), Researching visual arts education in museums and galleries: An International reader. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0043-7_2.
Atkins, C. (2014, January 14). Science fairs: rewarding talent or privilege? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.plos.org/scied/2013/04/15/science-fairs-rewarding-talent-or-privilege/.
Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 76–107. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_02.
Bernard, W. (2011). What students really think about doing research. Science Teacher, 78, 52-54.
Bertram, C., & Christiansen, I. (2015). Understanding research: An introduction to reading research. Pretoria: Van. Pretoria: Van Schalk Publishers.
Betts, J. N. (2014). Evaluation of a High School Science-fair Program for promoting successful Inquiry-based Learning. Thesis: Portland State University.
Bitgood, S. (2010). An attention-value model of museum visitors. Edinburgh, UK: Center for the Advancement of Informal Science Education.
Cicek, V. (2012). After school student club practices in U.S. kindergarten thru 12th grade educational institutions. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2, 235-244.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th edition). Los Angeles: Sage.
Czerniak, C. (1996). Predictors of success in a district science fair competition: An exploratory study. School Science & Mathematics, 96, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10208.x.
Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97, 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21060.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. 14, 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747.
Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors` agendas on museum learning. Curator, 41, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00822.x.
Finnerty, V. (2013). Can participation in a school science fair improve middle school students’ attitudes toward science and interest in science careers? Dissertation; University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Fisanick, L. M. (2010). A descriptive study of the middle school science teacher behavior for required student participation in science fair competitions (Dissertation Thesis). Pennysylvania: Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Flanagan, G. (2013). Retrieved January 14, 2016, from Science fairs: reward talent or privilege? Retrieved from http://blogs.plos.org/scied/2013/04/15/science-fairs-rewarding-talent-or-privilege/.
Gifford, V. D., & Wiygul, S. M. (1992). The Effect of the Use of Outside Facilities and Resources on Success in Secondary School Science Fairs. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb12155.x.
Hayden, K., Ouyang, Y., Scinski, L., Olszewski, B., & Bielefeldt, T. (2011). Increasing student interest and attitudes in STEM: Professional development and activities to engage and inspire learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 47-69.
Kahenge, W. (2013). Understanding educators’ and learners’ perceptions and experiences of their participation in Science Fairs/Expos. Cape Town: Rhodes University, South Africa.
Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design (9th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Leftwich, M. (2012). Welcome to My World: Researching the Role of Personal Narrative and Affective Presence at Graceland. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the regulations of the Institute of Education, University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. London: University of London.
Lelliot, A. 2014. Scientific literacy and the South African school curriculum. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 311-323.
Mayring, P, (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
Mbowane, C.K., De Villiers, J.J.R., &Braun, M.W.H. 2017. Teacher participation in science fairs as professional development. South African Journal of Science. 113(8).
Merriam-Webster, D. (2016). Retrieved on March, 22, 2017 from http://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/science%20fair.
Naidoo-Swettenham, T. (2017). Science and its Publics in South Africa: Eskom Expo for Young Scientists- Supporting a legacy for 35 years, Paper submitted in completion of the MPhil (Science and Technology Studies), CREST, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, University of Stellenbosch.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Ndlovu, M. (2015) Challenges for Olympiads and competitions in the country: Experiences from a regional expo for young scientists. Retrieved on September, 9, 2017 from http://www.saasta.ac.za/getsetgo/issues/201507/images/ndlovu.pdf.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2010). Analysing qualitative data. In K. Maree (Ed.), First Steps in Research. South Africa: Van Schaik.
Pekarik, A. J., Doering, Z. D., & Karns, D. A. (1999). Exploring satisfying experiences in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 42(2), 152-173.
Robelen, E. W. (2011). Awareness grows of importance of learning science beyond school. Education Week, 30(27), 2-5.
Sahin, A. (2013). STEM clubs and science fair competitions: Effects on post-secondary matriculation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(1), 7-13.
Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM Related After-School Program Activities and Associated Outcomes on Student Learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 309-322.
Seidman, I. (2012) Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
Taylor, D. L. (2015) Township learners and the Eskom community of practice. Retrieved on October, 13, 2017 from http://www.saasta.ac.za/getsetgo/issues/201507/images/taylor.
Tran, N. M. (2011). The relationship between students’ connections to out-of-school experiencesand factors associated with science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1625-1651.
Van Winkle, C. M., & Falk, J. H. (2015). Personal Meaning Mapping at festivals: A useful tool for a challenging context. Event Management, 19, 143-150. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599515X14229071393223.
Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. New York, NY: Scribner Books.
Webb, N., Alt, M., Ely, R., & Vesperman, B. (2005). Web Alignment Tool (WAT) Training Manual. Madison, W.I, U.S.A.: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Wirt, J. L. (2011). An analysis of science Olympiad participant’s perceptions regarding their experience with the science and engineering academic competition. Doctoral Dissertation. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 26.
Wong, B. (2015). Careers “From” but not “in” science: Why are aspirations to be a scientist challenging ffor minority ethnic students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 979-1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21231.

How to cite this article

APA

Mupezeni, S., & Kriek, J. (2018). Out-of-school Activity: A Comparison of the Experiences of Rural and Urban Participants in Science Fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), em1577. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041

Vancouver

Mupezeni S, Kriek J. Out-of-school Activity: A Comparison of the Experiences of Rural and Urban Participants in Science Fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(8):em1577. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041

AMA

Mupezeni S, Kriek J. Out-of-school Activity: A Comparison of the Experiences of Rural and Urban Participants in Science Fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(8), em1577. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041

Chicago

Mupezeni, Sure, and Jeanne Kriek. "Out-of-school Activity: A Comparison of the Experiences of Rural and Urban Participants in Science Fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 8 (2018): em1577. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041

Harvard

Mupezeni, S., and Kriek, J. (2018). Out-of-school Activity: A Comparison of the Experiences of Rural and Urban Participants in Science Fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), em1577. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041

MLA

Mupezeni, Sure et al. "Out-of-school Activity: A Comparison of the Experiences of Rural and Urban Participants in Science Fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 8, 2018, em1577. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92041