Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Abdullah, A., Ahmad, N., & Nohseth, N. (2020). Investigating student’s learning difficulties in Shape and Space topic: A case study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 5315-5321. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR2020238
• Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1
• Bishop, A. J. (1983). Space and geometry. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 125-203). Academic Press.
• Carter, J., Li, Y., & Ferrucci, B. (1997). A comparison of how textbooks present integer addition and subtraction in China and the United States. The Mathematics Educator, 2(2), 197-209.
• Charalambous, C., Delaney, S., Hsu, H., & Mesa, M. (2010). A Comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 12(2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070
• Clements, D., & Battista, M. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning-A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Macmillan Publishing Company.
• Cueto, S., Ramírez, C. & León, J. (2006). Opportunities to learn and achievement in mathematics in a sample of sixth grade students in Lima, Peru. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 25-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-7922-2
• Curriculum Development Council. (2000). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum development consultation document. The Council.
• Curriculum Development Council. (2002). Basic education curriculum guide: Building on strengths. The Council.
• Dienes, Z. P. (1971). Building up Mathematics (4th Ed.). Hutchinson.
• Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9069-6
• Flores-Bascuñana, M., Diago, P. D., Villena-Taranilla, R., & Yáñez, D. F. (2020). On augmented reality for the learning of 3D-geometric contents: A preliminary exploratory study with 6-grade primary students. Education Sciences, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010004
• Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French, and German Classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005832
• Hallowell, D. A., Okamoto, Y., Romo, L. F., & La Joy, J. R. (2015). First-graders’ spatial-mathematical reasoning about plane and solid shapes and their representations. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 47(3), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0664-9
• Ho, S. C. (Ed.). (2011). The fourth HKPISA report PISA 2009: Monitoring the quality and equality of education in Hong Kong from an international perspective from PISA 2000 to PISA 2009. HKPISA Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
• Hus, W. M., & Lin, M. J. (2008). A content analysis of geometry material in elementary school textbook of Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journal of National Pingtung University of Education, 28, 1-52.
• Hus, W. M., & Lin, M. J. (2009). A content analysis of geometry materials in elementary mathematics textbook of Taiwan, China and Hong Kong. National Changhua Educational journal, 16, 49-75.
• Jones, D. L., & Tarr, J. E. (2007). An examination of the levels of cognitive demand required by probability tasks in middle grades mathematics textbooks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 4-27.
• Kan, P. W., Ma, S. Y., So, W. Y., & Wong, K. M. (1995). An analysis of the Hong Kong primary mathematics textbooks: The learning dimension of shape and space (1). EduMath, 1, 16-18.
• Kan, P. W., Ma, S. Y., So, W. Y., & Wong, K. M. (1996). An analysis of the Hong Kong primary mathematics textbooks: The learning dimension of shape and space (2). EduMath, 2, 39-45.
• Kolovou, A, van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. & Bakker, A. (2009). Non-routine problem solving tasks in primary school mathematics textbooks: A needle in a haystack. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(2), 31-68.
• Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
• Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 40, pp. 181-248). Erlbaum.
• Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040409.63571.56
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth and fourth Grades. Boston College.
• Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Boston College.
• Ng, O., Shi, L., & Ting, F. (2020). Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: Dynamic geometry and 3D Printing. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1
• OECD (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume I). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-I.pdf
• OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
• Ozdemir, G. (2010). Exploring visuospatial thinking in learning about mineralogy: spatial orientation ability and spatial visualization ability. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 737-759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9183-x
• Ping, O. W., & Hua, A. K. (2016). A case report of educational in 3D and 2D towards primary mathematics. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Science, 3(2), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3398614.v1
• Pingel, F. (1999). UNESCO guidebook on textbook research and textbook revision. Hahn.
• Reys, B., Reys, R., & Koyama, M. (1996). The development of computation in three Japanese primary-grade textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1086/461837
• Reys, R., Reys, B., Lapan, R., Holliday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 74-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034700
• Rezat, S. (2009). The utilization of mathematics textbooks as instruments for learning. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME6 (Vol 6, pp. 1260-1269), Lyon France.
• Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. (2007). How curriculum influences students’ learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557-628). Information Age.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.
• Sun, X. (2011). Variation problems and their roles in the topic of fraction division in Chinese Mathematics textbook examples. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9263-4
• Tarr, J. E., Reys, R. E., Reys, B. J., Chavez, O., Shih, J., & Osterlind, S. J. (2008). The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 247-280. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034970
• Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005
• Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight. A theory of mathematics education. Academic press Inc.
• Vincent, J., & K. Stacey (2008). Do mathematics textbooks cultivate shallow teaching? Applying the TIMSS Video Study criteria to Australian Eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 20(1), 82-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217470
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817-835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
• Wijaya, A., van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1
• Wong, K. L. (2014). Mathematical literacy. In S. C. Ho (Ed.), The fifth HKPISA report: PISA2012 (pp. 45-93). The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Hong Kong PISA Centre.
• Wong, N. Y. (1990). Spatial mathematical games and the training of spatial ability [in Chinese]. Math Media, 56, 78-96.
• Wong, N. Y., Han, J. W., & Lee, P. Y. (2004). The mathematics curriculum: Towards globalisation or Westernisation? In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 27-70). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812562241_0002

APA

Zhang, Q. (2021). Opportunities to Learn Three-Dimensional Shapes in Primary Mathematics: The Case of Content Analysis of Primary Mathematics Textbooks in Hong Kong. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), em1971. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10884

Vancouver

Zhang Q. Opportunities to Learn Three-Dimensional Shapes in Primary Mathematics: The Case of Content Analysis of Primary Mathematics Textbooks in Hong Kong. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(6):em1971. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10884

AMA

Zhang Q. Opportunities to Learn Three-Dimensional Shapes in Primary Mathematics: The Case of Content Analysis of Primary Mathematics Textbooks in Hong Kong. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(6), em1971. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10884

Chicago

Zhang, Qiaoping. "Opportunities to Learn Three-Dimensional Shapes in Primary Mathematics: The Case of Content Analysis of Primary Mathematics Textbooks in Hong Kong". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 6 (2021): em1971. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10884

Harvard

Zhang, Q. (2021). Opportunities to Learn Three-Dimensional Shapes in Primary Mathematics: The Case of Content Analysis of Primary Mathematics Textbooks in Hong Kong. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), em1971. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10884

MLA

Zhang, Qiaoping "Opportunities to Learn Three-Dimensional Shapes in Primary Mathematics: The Case of Content Analysis of Primary Mathematics Textbooks in Hong Kong". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 6, 2021, em1971. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10884