Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Asadullin, R. (2016). Pedagogics of the subject-oriented education. Ufa: M. Akmulla BSPU.
• Ballou, D., & Springer, M. G. (2015). Using Student Test Scores to Measure Teacher Performance. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15574904.
• Bedesem, P. L., & Dieker, L. A. (2013). Self-Monitoring with a Twist. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(4), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300713492857.
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman.
• Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., Corso, M. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2014). Promoting Student Engagement in the Classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1-34.
• Burbules, N. (2004). Ways of Thinking about Educational Quality. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033006004.
• Chen, L. L. (2011). Improving Teachers’ Teaching with Communication Technology. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.1.d.
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Assessing Assessment in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103054003001.
• Csapo, B. (2007). Research into learning to learn through the assessment of quality and organization of learning outcomes. The Curriculum Journal, 18(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170701446044.
• Edmunds, J. A. (2008). Using Alternative Lenses to Examine Effective Teachers’ Use of Technology with Low-Performing Students. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 195-217.
• Ghatala, E. S. (2011). Strategy-Monitoring Training Enables Young Learners to Select Effective Strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(2), 43-54.
• Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher Preparation for Quality Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111409415.
• Hsieh, F. J., Law, C. K., & Shy, H. Y. (2011). Mathematics Teacher Education Quality in TEDS-M: Globalizing the Views of Future Teachers and Teacher Educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110390819.
• Kaptelinin, V. (1999). Learning Together: Educational Benefits and Prospects for Computer Support. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3), 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_6.
• Khan, M. S., Bibi, S., & Hasan, M. (2016). Australian Technical Teachers’ Experience of Technology Integration in Teaching. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016663609.
• Khuziakhmetov, A. N., & Sytina, N. S. (2016). Educational Process Navigator as Means of Creation of Individual Educational Path of a Student. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 2255-2264.
• Lebedeva, O., Bykova, S., Masalimova, A. R., Sokolova, N. L., & Kryukova, N. I. (2018). Peculiarities of developing high school students’ lexical skills by means of the programmed learning technology. XLinguae, 11(1), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.01.16.
• Louie, B. Y., Drevdahl, D. J., Purdy, J. M., & Stackman, R. W. (2003). Advancing the Scholarship of Teaching through Collaborative Self-Study. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 150-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777194.
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
• Nair, C. S., Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2010). Leadership and Management of Quality in Higher Education. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780630373.
• Näykki, P., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. (2017). Monitoring makes a difference: quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066440.
• Pange, J. (2004). How often do Pre-School Teachers in Greece Use Nt and ICT in Their Classrooms? A Study of Continuing Education Needs. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 10(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.7227/JACE.10.1.6.
• Pyl, S. J. (1989). Diagnostic reports as bases for decisions on teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(89)90020-6.
• Richards, C. E. (1988). A Typology of Educational Monitoring Systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(2), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737010002106.
• Robertson, H. J. (2003). Teacher Education and Information and Communications Technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 280-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255499.
• Rozhina, V.A., & Baklashova, T.A. (2018). Teaching English language to young school-age children while making projects, playing games and using robotics. XLinguae, 11(1), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.01.10.
• Schunk, D. H. (1982). Progress Self-Monitoring. Effects on Children’s Self-Efficacy and Achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 51(2), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1982.11011845.
• Seo, D., McGrane, J., & Taherbhai, H. (2015). The Role of Student Growth Percentiles in Monitoring Learning and Predicting Learning Outcomes. Educational Assessment, 20(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1028621.
• Shaffer, D. W., Nash, P., & Ruis, A. R. (2015). Technology and the New Professionalization of Teaching. Teachers College Record, 117(12), 1-30.
• Sorden, S. D. (2005). A cognitive approach to instructional design for multimedia learning. Informing science journal, 8, 263-279. https://doi.org/10.28945/498.
• Tuninga, R. S., & Seinen, I. B. (1995). The Supply and Demand of Distance Education in Russia. Washington: The World Bank, Bureau Cross.
• Usova, A. V. (2002). How to Make Learning Interesting and Successful. Russian Education & Society, 44(2), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393440265.
• Wang, J., Lin, E., Spalding, E., Klecka, C. L., & Odell, S. J. (2011). Quality Teaching and Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111409551.

APA

Barinova, N., Zakirova, V., Akhmetova, D., & Lysogorova, L. (2018). Monitoring of the Educational Process with the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Case Study in Computer Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2379-2391. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89840

Vancouver

Barinova N, Zakirova V, Akhmetova D, Lysogorova L. Monitoring of the Educational Process with the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Case Study in Computer Science. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6):2379-91. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89840

AMA

Barinova N, Zakirova V, Akhmetova D, Lysogorova L. Monitoring of the Educational Process with the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Case Study in Computer Science. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6), 2379-2391. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89840

Chicago

Barinova, Natalia, Venera Zakirova, Daniya Akhmetova, and Lyudmila Lysogorova. "Monitoring of the Educational Process with the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Case Study in Computer Science". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 6 (2018): 2379-2391. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89840

Harvard

Barinova, N., Zakirova, V., Akhmetova, D., and Lysogorova, L. (2018). Monitoring of the Educational Process with the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Case Study in Computer Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), pp. 2379-2391. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89840

MLA

Barinova, Natalia et al. "Monitoring of the Educational Process with the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Case Study in Computer Science". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 6, 2018, pp. 2379-2391. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89840