Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Akkoc, H. (2008). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ concept images of radian. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(7), 857-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802054458.
• Allen, H. D. (1977). The teaching of trigonometry in the United States and Canada: A consideration of elementary course content and approach and factors influencing change, 1890-1970 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
• Biehler, R. (2005). Reconstruction of Meaning as a Didactical Task: The Concept of Function as an Example. In Kilpatrick J., Hoyles C., Skovsmose O., Valero P. (Eds), Meaning in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library (vol 37, pp. 61-81). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24040-3_5.
• Brown, S.A. (2005). The trigonometric connections: Students’ understanding of sine and cosine (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Illinois State University, Illinois, IL.
• Bunge, M. (2008). Tratado de Filosofía. Semántica I, Sentido y referencia. Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa Editorial.
• Byers, P. (2010). Investigating trigonometric representations in the transition to college mathematics. College Quarterly, 13, 2, 1–10. Retrieved from http://collegequarterly.ca/2010-vol13-num02-spring/byers.html.
• Castro-Rodríguez, E., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Rico, L., & Gómez, P. (2016). Prospective teachers’ understanding of the multiplicative part-whole relationship of fraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9673-4.
• Challenger, M. (2009). From triangles to a concept: a phenomenographic study of A-level students’ development of the concept of trigonometry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Warwick University, UK. Retrieved from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1935/1/WRAP_THESIS_Challenger_2009.pdf.
• Cohen, L. Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education, Routledge, London. UK.
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. Mission statement [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.corestandards.org/. District of Columbia: The Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.
• De Kee, S., Mura, R., & Dionne J. (1996). La comprensión des notions de sinus et de cosines chez des élèves du secondaire [Understanding the notions of sine and cosine in high school students]. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 19-22. Retrieved from https://flm-journal.org/Articles/5607DD229F6EE053055D3F415A7F74.pdf.
• De Villiers, M., & Jugmohan, J. (2012). Learners’ conceptualisation of the sine function during an introductory activity using sketchpad at grade 10 level. Educ. Matem. Pesq., São Paulo, 14(1), 9-30. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/emp/article/viewFile/8750/6826.
• DeJarnette, A. F. (2018). Students’ Conceptions of Sine and Cosine Functions When Representing Periodic Motion in a Visual Programming Environment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 390-423. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0390.
• Demir, O. (2012). Students’ concept development and understanding of sine and cosine functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Amsterdan University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved from https://esc.fnwi.uva.nl/thesis/centraal/files/f107257570.pdf.
• Demopoulos, W. (1994). Frege, Hilbert, and the conceptual structure of model theory. History and Philosophy of Logic, 15(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445349408837233.
• Dogân, A. (2001). A research on misconceptions and mistakes of the students and their attitudes towards the trigonometry subjects which are teaching in the highschools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Selçuk University Institute of Sciences, Konya: Turkey.
• Dündar, S. (2015). Mathematics Teacher-Candidates’ Performance in Solving Problems with Different Representation Styles: The Trigonometry Example. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1379-1397. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1396a.
• Fanning, J. D. (2016). Student responses to instruction in rational trigonometry. In Tim Fukawa-Connelly, Nicole Engelke Infante, Megan Wawro and Stacy Brown (Eds), Proceedings from 19th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, (pp. 741-751) Pittsburgh: PA.
• Fernández-Plaza, J. A., Rico, L., & Ruiz-Hidalgo, J. F. (2013). Concept of finite limit of a function at a point: Meanings and specific terms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 699-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.805887.
• Fi, C. (2003). Preservice secondary school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of trigonometry: subject matter content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and envisioned pedagogy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Iowa, Iowa. Retrieved from https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4936&context=etd.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Warren, E. A. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Newyork: McGraw-Hill.
• Frege, G. (1962). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. [About sense and meaning] In G. Patzig (Ed.), Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien (pp. 40–65).
• Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactycal phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel. Retrieved from http://gpdmatematica.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Freudenthal_Didactical_Phenomenology_of_Mathematical_Structures1983.pdf.
• Golding, G. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397-430). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Gur, H. (2009). Trigonometry Learning. New Horizons in Education, 57(1), 67-80. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ860819.pdf.
• Hertel, J. T. (2013). Investigating the purpose of trigonometry in the modern sciences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Illinois State University, Illinois, IL.
• Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D.A. Grouws (Eds.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 65-98). New York: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.2307/749496.
• Kamber, D., & Takaci, D. (2018). On problematic aspects in learning trigonometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1357846.
• Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 1, pp. 403-407). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/226.
• Lamon, S. J. (1995). Ratio and proportion: Elementary didactical phenomenology. In J.T. Sowder & B.P. Schapelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades (pp. 167-198). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
• Maor, E. (1998). Trigonometric delights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Marchi, D. J. (2012). A Study of Student Understanding of the Sine Function through Representations and the Process and Object Perspectives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The Ohio State University, Ohio. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1343253667&disposition=inline.
• Martín Fernández, E., Ruiz Hidalgo, J. F., & Rico, L. (2016). Significado escolar de las razo¬nes trigonométricas elementales [Student´s notions of elementary trigonometric ratios]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 34(3), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1871.
• Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (2007). Real Decreto 1467/2007, por el que se establece la estructura del bachillerato y se fijan sus enseñanzas mínimas. [Royal legilastive Decree 1467/2007, by which the structure of the baccalaureate is established and its minimum teachings are set], BOE, 266, 2007, 2nd November, pp. 45381-45477.
• Montiel Espinosa, G., & Jácome Cortés, G. (2014). Significado trigonométrico en el professor [Trigonometric meaning in the teacher]. Boletim de Educação Matemática, 28(50), 1193-1216. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v28n50a10.
• Moore, K. C. (2012). Coherence, quantitative reasoning, and the trigonometry of students. Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling: A driver for STEM integrated education and teaching in context, 2, 75-92. Retrieved from http://www.uwyo.edu/wisdome/_files/documents/moore.pdf.
• Moore, K. C., & LaForest, K. R. (2014). The circle approach to trigonometry. Mathematics Teacher, 107(8), 616-623. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.8.0616.
• Moore, K. C., LaForest, K. R., & Kim, H. J. (2016). Putting the unit in pre-service secondary teachers’ unit circle. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9671-6.
• Morgan, C., & Kynigos, C. (2014). Digital artefacts as representations: forging connections between a constructionist and a social semiotic perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(3), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9523-1.
• Orhun, N. (2004). Students’ mistakes and misconceptions on teaching of trigonometry. Retrieved from http://dipmat.math.unipa.it/~grim/AOrhun.PDF.
• Paoletti, T., Stevens, I. E., Hobson, N. L., Moore, K. C., & LaForest, K. R. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ inverse function meanings. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, K. Keene, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 853-867). Pittsburgh, PA: West Virginia.
• Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical thinking and learning, 5(1), 37-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02.
• Rico, L. (2009). Sobre las nociones de representación y comprensión en la investigación en educación matemática [On the notions of representation and understanding in mathematics education research], PNA, 4(1), 1-14. Retrieved from http://funes.uniandes.edu.co/662/1/Rico2009Sobre.pdf.
• Rico, L., & Moreno, A. (2016). Elementos de didáctica de la matemática para el profesor de secundaria [Mathematics didactic elements for the secondary school teacher]. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Pirámide. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=660283.
• Sáenz-Ludlow, A. (2003). A collective chain of signification in conceptualizing fractions: A case of a fourth-grade class. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(2), 181-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00019-1.
• Sevimli, E., & Delice, A. (2012). The relationship between students’ mathematical thinking types and representation preferences in definite integral problems. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 295-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.734988.
• Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology. Oxford, Uk: Oxford University Press.
• Sickle, J. V. (2011). A history of trigonometry Education in the United States 1776-1990 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Combia Uniluversity, Nueva York, NY. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8G166T7.
• Skemp, R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
• Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 157-189. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009984621792.
• Steinbring, H. (2006). What makes a sign a mathematical sign? –An epistemological perspective on mathematical interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 133-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5892-z.
• Tavera, F., & Villa Ochoa, J. A. (2016). Sobre las razones y las funciones trigonométricas: ¿Qué tratamiento hacen los libros de texto? [On the ratios and trigonometric functions: What treatment do textbooks do?]. Acta Latinoamericana de Matemática Educativa. Retrieved from http://200.24.17.68:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2459/1/Tavera_Villa-ochoa_2016.pdf.
• Thompson, K. (2007). Student’s understanding of trigonometry enhanced through the use of a real world problem: improving the instructional sequence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Illinois State Uni¬versity, Illinois, IL.
• Thompson, P. W., Carlson, M. P., & Silverman, J. (2007). The design of tasks in support of teachers’ development of coherent mathematical meanings. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9054-8.
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc.
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Didactical phenomenology (Freudenthal). In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 174-176). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_49.
• Vergnaud G. (1990). La théorie des champs conceptuels, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques [Conceptuals Fields Theory, Research in Mathematical Didactics], 10(2.3), 133-170.
• Vizmanos, J. R., Alcaide, F., Hernández, J., Moreno, M., & Serrano, E. (2008). Matemáticas 1º Bachillerato (Ciencias y Tecnología) [Mathematics 1st Baccalaureate (Science and Technology)]. Madrid, Spain: S.M.
• Weber, K. (2005). Student’s understanding of trigonometric functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 102(2), 144-147. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ747914.pdf.
• Weber, K. (2008). Teaching trigonometric functions: Lessons learned from research. Mathematics Teacher, 17(3), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217423.
• Yiǧit Koyunkaya, M. (2016). Mathematics education graduate students’ understanding of trigonometric ratios. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(7), 1028-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1155774.
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 222–231). Westport CT: Libraries Unlimited.

APA

Martín-Fernández, E., Ruiz-Hidalgo, J. F., & Rico, L. (2019). Meaning and Understanding of School Mathematical Concepts by Secondary Students: The Study of Sine and Cosine. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490

Vancouver

Martín-Fernández E, Ruiz-Hidalgo JF, Rico L. Meaning and Understanding of School Mathematical Concepts by Secondary Students: The Study of Sine and Cosine. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(12):em1782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490

AMA

Martín-Fernández E, Ruiz-Hidalgo JF, Rico L. Meaning and Understanding of School Mathematical Concepts by Secondary Students: The Study of Sine and Cosine. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(12), em1782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490

Chicago

Martín-Fernández, Enrique, Juan Francisco Ruiz-Hidalgo, and Luis Rico. "Meaning and Understanding of School Mathematical Concepts by Secondary Students: The Study of Sine and Cosine". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 12 (2019): em1782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490

Harvard

Martín-Fernández, E., Ruiz-Hidalgo, J. F., and Rico, L. (2019). Meaning and Understanding of School Mathematical Concepts by Secondary Students: The Study of Sine and Cosine. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490

MLA

Martín-Fernández, Enrique et al. "Meaning and Understanding of School Mathematical Concepts by Secondary Students: The Study of Sine and Cosine". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 12, 2019, em1782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490