Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Bevan, N., Kirakowski, J., & Maissel, J. (1991). What is usability? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on HCI, 165-169.
• Cavuoto, L. A., & Nussbaum, M. A. (2013). Obesity-related differences in muscular capacity during sustained isometric exertions. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 254-260.
• Chao, J. Y, Chao, S. J., Yao, L. Y., & Liu, C. H. (2016). A Case Study of Design and Usability Evaluation of the Collaborative Problem Solving Instructional Platform System. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(10), 2647-2655.
• Chou, J. R. (2016). An empirical study of user experience on touch mice. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(11), 2875-2885.
• Fernström, E., & Ericson, M.O. (1997). Computer mouse or Trackpoint-effects on muscular load and operator experience. Applied Ergonomics, 28, 347-354.
• Finstad K. (2010). The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22, 323-327.
• Fogelholm, M., Malmberg, J., Suni, J., Santtila, M., Kyrolainen, H., & Mantysaari, M. (2006). Waist circumference and BMI are independently associated with the variation of cardio-respiratory and neuromuscular fitness in young adult men. International Journal of Obesity, 30, 962-969.
• Garmer, K., Sperling, L., & Forsberg, A. (2002). A hand-ergonomics training kit: development and evaluation of a package to support improved awareness and critical thinking. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 39-49.
• Garrett, J. W. (1971). The adult human hand. Some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 13, 117-131.
• Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300-311.
• Gustafsson, E., & Hagberg, M. (2003). Computer mouse use in two different hand positions: exposure, comfort, exertion and productivity. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 107-113.
• Han, S. H., Yun, M. H., Kwahk, J., & Hong, S. W. (2001). Usability of consumer electronic products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28, 143-151.
• Heo, J., Ham, D. H., Park, S., Song, C., & Yoon, W. C. (2009). A framework for evaluating the usability of mobile phones based on multi-level, hierarchical model of usability factors. Interacting with Computers, 21, 263-275.
• Herring, S. R., Castillejos, P. M., & Hallbeck, M. S. (2011). User-centered evaluation of handle shape and size and input controls for a neutron detector. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 919-928.
• Hulens, M., Vansant, G., Lysens, R., Claessens, A. L., Muls, E., & Brumagne, S., 2001. Study of differences in peripheral muscle strength of lean versus obese women: an allometric approach. International Journal of Obesity, 25, 676-681.
• ISO 9241-11, 1998. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on Usability.
• Jin, B. S., & Ji, Y. G. (2010). Usability risk level evaluation for physical user interface of mobile phone. Computers in Industry, 61, 350-363.
• Jindrich, D. L., Balakrishnan, A. D., & Dennerlein, J. T. (2004). Effects of keyswitch design and finger posture on finger joint kinematics and dynamics during tapping on computer keyswitches. Clinical Biomechanics, 19, 600-608.
• Johnson, P. W., Hagberg, M., Hjelm, E. W., & Rempel, D. (2000). Measuring and characterizing force exposures during computer mouse use. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 26, 398-405.
• Jordan, P. W. (1998). Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics, 29, 25-33.
• Kitagawa, K., & Miyashita, M. (1978). Muscle strengths in relation to fat storage rate in young men. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 38, 189-196.
• Kwahk, J., & Han, S. H. (2002). A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 419-431.
• Kwon, O., Jung, K., You, H., & Kim, H. E. (2009). Determination of key dimensions for a glove sizing system by analyzing the relationships between hand dimensions. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 762-766.
• Lee, D. L., McLoone, H., & Dennerlein, J. T. (2008). Observed finger behaviour during computer mouse use. Applied Ergonomics, 39, 107-113.
• Lee, S., Heo, G., & Chang, S. H. (2006a). Prediction of the human response time with the similarity and quantity of information. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91, 728-734.
• Lee, Y. S., Hong, S. W., Smith-Jackson, T. L., Nussbaum, M. A., & Tomioka K. (2006b). Systematic evaluation methodology for cell phone user interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 18, 304-325.
• Marcus, A. (2003). The emotion commotion. Interactions - Bridging the gap, 10, 28-34.
• McGorry, R. W. (2001). A system for the measurement of grip forces and applied moments during hand tool use. Applied Ergonomics, 32, 271-279.
• Miyatake, N., Fujii, M., Nishikawa, H., Wada, J., Shikata, K., Makino, H., & Kimura, I. (2000). Clinical evaluation of muscle strength in 20-79-years-old obese Japanese. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 48, 15-21.
• Muscle strength in obese elderly women: effect of recreational physical activity in a cross-sectional study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79, 552-557.
• Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston.
• Norman, D.A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.
• Park, K. S., & Lim, C. H. (1999). A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface designs using usability criteria and measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 23, 379- 389.
• Park, Y. S. & Han, S. H. (2010). Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: Effects of touch key size and touch key location. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 68-76.
• Rolland, Y., Lauwers-Cances, V., Pahor, M., Fillaux, J., Grandjean, H., & Vellas, B. (2004). Muscle strength in obese elderly women: effect of recreational physical activity in a cross-sectional study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79(4), 552-557.
• Ryu, T., Lim, J., Song, J., Yun, M. H., & Shin, M. (2013). Performance comparison between the preferred right and preferred left hands in text entry using Qwerty touch keyboard smartphones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 43, 400-405.
• Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design, McGraw-Hall, New York.
• Shi, W. Z., Sun, J., Xu, C., & Huan, W. (2016). Assessing the Use of Smartphone in the University General Physics Laboratory. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 125- 132.
• Smith, A., & Dunckley, L. (2002). Prototype evaluation and redesign: structuring the design space through contextual techniques. Interacting with Computers, 14, 821-843.
• Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2013). The influence of socio-cultural background and product value in usability testing. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 341-349.
• Sutter, C., & Ziefle, M. (2004). Psychomotor efficiency in users of notebook input devices: confirmation and restrictions of Fitts’ Law as an evaluative tool for user-friendly design. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings. Computer Systems, 5, 773-777.
• Sutter, C., & Ziefle, M. (2006). Psychomotor performance of input device users and Optimized cursor control. In: Human factors and ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings. Computer Systems, 5, 742-746.
• Wang, E. M. Y., & Chao, W. C. (2010). In searching for constant body ratio benchmarks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 59-67.
• Woods, V., Hastings, S., Buckle, P., & Haslam, R. (2003). Development of non-keyboard input device checklists through assessments. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 511-519.
• Wu, S. W., Wu, S. F., Liang, H. W., Wu, Z. T., & Huang, S. (2009). Measuring factors affecting grip strength in a Taiwan Chinese population and a comparison with consolidated norms. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 811-815.
• Yu, A., Yick, K. L., Ng, S. P., & Yip, J. (2013). 2D and 3D anatomical analyses of hand dimensions for custom-made gloves. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 381-392.

APA

Ko, Y.-C., Lo, C.-H., & Hsiao, S.-W. (2017). Interface Design Optimization by an Improved Operating Model for College Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2601-2625. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01243a

Vancouver

Ko YC, Lo CH, Hsiao SW. Interface Design Optimization by an Improved Operating Model for College Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6):2601-25. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01243a

AMA

Ko YC, Lo CH, Hsiao SW. Interface Design Optimization by an Improved Operating Model for College Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(6), 2601-2625. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01243a

Chicago

Ko, Ya-Chuan, Chi-Hung Lo, and Shih-Wen Hsiao. "Interface Design Optimization by an Improved Operating Model for College Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 6 (2017): 2601-2625. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01243a

Harvard

Ko, Y.-C., Lo, C.-H., and Hsiao, S.-W. (2017). Interface Design Optimization by an Improved Operating Model for College Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), pp. 2601-2625. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01243a

MLA

Ko, Ya-Chuan et al. "Interface Design Optimization by an Improved Operating Model for College Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 6, 2017, pp. 2601-2625. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01243a