Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Andersen, L., & Chen, J. (2016). Do high-ability students disidentify with science? A descriptive study of U.S. ninth graders in 2009. Science Education, 100(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21197
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881-908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2008). Girls’ biology, boys’ physics: Evidence from free-choice science learning settings. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701847538
• Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 153-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368
• Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466-489. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20143
• Beal, S. J., & Crockett, L. J. (2010). Adolescents’ occupational and educational aspirations and expectations: Links to high school activities and adult educational attainment. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017416
• Bevan, B., Dillon, J., Hein, G. E., Macdonald, M., Michalchik, V., Miller, D., … Yoon, S. (2010). Making science matter: Collaborations between informal science education organizations and schools. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
• Breakwell, G. M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/2/003
• Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3
• Burke, L., Francis, K., & Shanahan, M. (2014). A horizon of possibilities: a definition of STEM education. Paper presented at the STEM 2014 Conference, Vancouver, July 12-15.
• Campbell, G., Denes, R., & Morrison, C. (Eds.). (2000). Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Chow, A., Eccles, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1612-1628. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030194
• DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011). High aspirations but low progression: The science aspirations careers paradox amongst minority ethnic students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 243-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9245-0
• DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608197
• Dunst, C. J., & Raab, M. (2006). Influence of child interests on variations in child behavior and functioning. Ashville, NC: Winterberry.
• English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
• Falk, J. H. & Dierking, L. D. (2002) Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95% Solution: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98, 486-493. https://doi.org/10.1511/2010.87.486
• Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2013). Factors contributing to adult knowledge of science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 431-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21080
• Falk, J. H., Staus, N. L., Dierking, L. D., Penuel, W., Wyld, J., & Bailey, D. (2016). Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: the Synergies project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11, 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1093670
• Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1743
• Fortus, D. (2104). Attending to affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21155
• Fouts, J. T. (1987). High school social studies classroom environments and attitudes: A cluster analysis approach. Theory and Research in Social Education, 15(2), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1987.10505540
• Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x
• Galton, M. (2009). Moving to secondary school: Initial encounters and their effects. Perspectives on Education (Primary Secondary Transfer in Science), 2, 5-21.
• Gerard, R. W. (1957). Units and concepts of biology. Science, 125, 429-433. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.125.3245.429
• Gilmartin, S. K., Li, E., & Aschbacher, F. (2006). The relationship between secondary students’ interest in physical science or engineering, science class experiences, and family contexts: Variations by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2-3), 179-207. https://doi.org/10.1615/JwomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2-3.50
• Häussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870-888. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10048
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899-906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530
• Havard, N. (1996). Student attitudes to studying A-level science. Public Understanding of Science 5(4), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/002
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
• Jain, A., & Dubes, R. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Kodinariya, T. M., & Makwana, P. R. (2013). Review on determining number of clusters in K-means clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6), 90-95.
• Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to self-determination theory. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), The handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405-427). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
• Krapp, A. (2007). An educational-psychological conceptualization of interest. International Journal of Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-007-9113-9
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
• Krogh, L. B., & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690412331314469
• Lee, C. D. (2008). The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: How an ecological framework in education research facilitates civic responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08322683
• Lindahl, B. (2007, April). A longitudinal study of students’ attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the meeting of NARST, New Orleans, LA.
• Maltese, A. V., Melki, C. S., & Wiebke, H. L. (2014). The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM. Science Education, 98, 937-962. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21132
• Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95, 877-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
• Moran, M. D. (2003). Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos, 100(2), 403-405. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12010.x
• Myers, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). Cluster analysis of high school science classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 929-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290904
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• National Research Council. (2015). Identifying and supporting productive STEM programs in out-of-school settings. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Ormerod, M., & Duckworth, D. (1975). Pupils’ attitudes to science. Slough: NFER.
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
• Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation, and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist 46(3), 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
• Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. E. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045
• Renninger, K. A., & Riley, K. R. (2013). Interest, cognition, and the case of L- and science. In S. Kreitler (Ed.). Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 352-382), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021463.021
• Renninger, K. A., & Su, S. (2012). Interest and its development. In R. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 167-187). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0011
• Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11^th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10134
• Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, Rationale, Questionnaire Development and Data Collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) - a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education (Acta Didactica 4/2004). Oslo: Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo. Retrieved from www.ils.uio.no/english/rose
• Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). Students’ changing attitudes and aspirations towards physics during secondary school. Research in Science Education, 49, 1809-1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9676-5
• Simpkins, S. D., Price, C. D., & Garcia, K. (2015). Parental support and high school students’ motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among Latino and Caucasian boys and girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1386-1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21246
• Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of the major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740102
• Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project. An overview and key findings. Retrieved from http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
• Staus, N. L., Lesseig, K., Lamb, R., Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. (2019). Validation of a measure of STEM interest for adolescents. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09970-7
• Stets, J. E., Brenner, P. S., Burke, P. J., & Serpe, R. T. (2017). The science identity and entering a science occupation. Social Science Research, 64, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.016
• Stocklmayer, S.M., Rennie, L.J. & Gilbert, J.K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46 (1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562284
• Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128690
• Taylor, P. (1993). Minority ethnic groups and gender access in higher education. New Community, 19, 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.1993.9976375
• Thomas, J. A., & Strunk, K. K. (2017). Expectancy-value and children’s science achievement: Parents matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21382
• Traphagen, K., & Traill, S. (2014). How cross-sector collaborations are advancing STEM learning. Los Altos, CA: Noyce Foundation.
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Current population survey, 2011 annual social and economic supplement. Washington, DC: Department of Labor.
• Vedder-Weiss, D. & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20398
• Venville, G., Rennie, L., Hanbury, C., & Longnecker, N. (2013). Scientists reflect on why they chose to study science. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2207-2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9352-3
• Wright, S. P. (1992). Adjusted p-values for simultaneous inference. Biometrics, 48, 1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532694

APA

Staus, N. L., Falk, J. H., Penuel, W., Dierking, L., Wyld, J., & Bailey, D. (2020). Interested, Disinterested, or Neutral: Exploring STEM Interest Profiles and Pathways in A Low-Income Urban Community. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1853. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7927

Vancouver

Staus NL, Falk JH, Penuel W, Dierking L, Wyld J, Bailey D. Interested, Disinterested, or Neutral: Exploring STEM Interest Profiles and Pathways in A Low-Income Urban Community. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(6):em1853. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7927

AMA

Staus NL, Falk JH, Penuel W, Dierking L, Wyld J, Bailey D. Interested, Disinterested, or Neutral: Exploring STEM Interest Profiles and Pathways in A Low-Income Urban Community. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(6), em1853. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7927

Chicago

Staus, Nancy L, John H Falk, William Penuel, Lynn Dierking, Jennifer Wyld, and Deborah Bailey. "Interested, Disinterested, or Neutral: Exploring STEM Interest Profiles and Pathways in A Low-Income Urban Community". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 6 (2020): em1853. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7927

Harvard

Staus, N. L., Falk, J. H., Penuel, W., Dierking, L., Wyld, J., and Bailey, D. (2020). Interested, Disinterested, or Neutral: Exploring STEM Interest Profiles and Pathways in A Low-Income Urban Community. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1853. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7927

MLA

Staus, Nancy L et al. "Interested, Disinterested, or Neutral: Exploring STEM Interest Profiles and Pathways in A Low-Income Urban Community". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 6, 2020, em1853. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7927