Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1860. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240
• Attard, C., Calder, N., Holmes, K., Larkin, K., & Trenholm, S. (2020). Teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In J. Way, C. Attard, J. Anderson, J. Bobis, H. McMaster, & K. Cartwright (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2016–2019 (pp. 319-347). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4269-5_13
• Barana, A., Fioravera, M., & Marchisio, M. (2017). Teacher training: A model for introducing innovative digital methodologies for learning Mathematics. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’17) (pp. 608-616). https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAD17.2017.5303
• Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
• Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Breit, S., Eder, F., Krainer, K., Schreiner, C., Seel, A., & Spiel, C. (2019). Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2018. Band 1 [National Education Report Austria 2018. Volume 1].
• Breuer, F., Dieris, B., & Lettau, A. (2009). Reflexive grounded theory: Eine einführung für die forschungspraxis (2009th ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
• Bruneforth, M., Lassnigg, L., Vogtenhuber, S., Schreiner, C., & Breit, S. (2016). Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2015 [National Education Report Austria 2015]. Leykam.
• Charmaz, K. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein, Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 675-694). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1 edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (Sixth ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
• Donevska-Todorova, A., & Trgalova, J. (2017). Learning mathematics with technology. A review of recent CERME research.
• Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M.-A., Ainley, J., Andresen, M., Chan, Y. C., Dana-Picard, T., Gueudet, G., Kidron, I., Leung, A., & Meagher, M. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI Study (pp. 89-132). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_7
• Dwyer, D. C. (1990). The evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the educational research association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED325074.pdf
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
• Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Allen & Unwin.
• Ferchhoff, W. (2007). Jugend und jugendkulturen im 21. Jahrhundert—Lebensformen und lebensstile [Youth and Youth Cultures in the 21st Century — Lifestyles and Lifestyles].
• Flood, V. J., Shvarts, A., & Abrahamson, D. (2020). Teaching with embodied learning technologies for mathematics: Responsive teaching for embodied learning. ZDM, 52(7), 1307-1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01165-7
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. AldineTransaction.
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2010). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Expert interviews and qualitative content analysis]. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91538-8
• Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00005-1
• Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., & Bakker, A. (2010). Improving mathematics at work: The need for techno-mathematical literacies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854655
• Inayat, M. F., & Hamid, S. N. (2016). Integrating new technologies and tools in teaching and learning of mathematics: An overview. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, 7(3), 122-129.
• Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2017). Mathematical problem solving with technology: The techno-mathematical fluency of a student-with-GeoGebra. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 1115-1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9728-8
• Kent, P., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2005). Techno-mathematical Literacies in the Workplace. Mathematics Statistics and Operational Research, 5(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2005.05010016
• Larkin, K., & Calder, N. (2016). Mathematics education and mobile technologies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0167-6
• Larkin, K., & Milford, T. (2018). Mathematics apps—Stormy with the weather clearing: Using cluster analysis to enhance app use in mathematics classrooms. In Using mobile technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 11-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90179-4_2
• Lavicza, Z., Juhos, I., Koren, B., Fenyvesi, K., Csapodi, C., Kis, M., & Mantecón, J.-D. (2015). Integrating technology into primary and secondary school teaching to enhance mathematics education in Hungary. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2430-2431). https://doi.org/10.3390/isis-summit-vienna-2015-T1.1007
• Lemmer, C. A. (2013). A view from the flip side: Using the inverted classroom to enhance the legal information literacy of the international LL. M. student. Law Library Journal, 105(4), 461-491.
• Mailizar, A., Abdulsalam, M., & Suci, B. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 16(7), em1860. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240
• Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (2011). Grounded theory reader (2nd ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93318-4
• Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
• O’Neal, L. J., Gibson, P., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in 21st-century teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
• Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1, 257-315.
• Ridder, H. (2016). Case study research: Approaches. In W. Matiaske, M. Spieß, et al. (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschungsmethoden (Vol. 12). Rainer Hampp Verlag.
• Rosenkranz, L. (2017). Qualitative forschungsprinzipien der grounded theory. In L. Rosenkranz (Ed.), Exzessive nutzung von onlinespielen im jugendalter (pp. 83-94). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15360-1_5
• Selter, C., Gräsel, C., Reinold, M., & Trempler, K. (2015). Variations of in-service training for primary mathematics teachers: An empirical study. ZDM, 47(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0639-2
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Sinclair, N. (2020). On teaching and learning mathematics–technologies. In STEM teachers and teaching in the digital era (pp. 91-107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_6
• Sipilä, K. (2014). Educational use of information and communications technology: Teachers’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.813407
• Smith, R. C., Kim, S., & McIntyre, L. (2016). Relationships between prospective middle grades mathematics teachers’ beliefs and TPACK. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1189624
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage.
• Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. ZDM, 52(7), 1411-1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01158-6
• Trgalová, J., Clark-Wilson, A., & Weigand, H. (2018). Technology and resources in mathematics education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113562-12
• Vitabar, F., Lavicza, Z., & Hohenwarter, M. (2019). Developing professional development programmes with gamification for mathematics teachers in Uruguay. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, Feb 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands.
• Weinhandl, R., Lavicza, Z., Houghton, T., & Hohenwarter, M. (2021). A look over students’ shoulders when learning mathematics in home-schooling. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1912423
• Wrona, T. (2005). Die Fallstudienanalyse als wissenschaftliche Forschungsmethode [The case study analysis as a scientific research method]. ESCP-EAP, Europ. Wirtschaftshochsch.
• Yeo, S. (2020). Integrating digital technology into elementary mathematics: Three theoretical perspectives. Research in Mathematical Education, 23(3), 165-179.

APA

Weinhandl, R., Houghton, T., Lindenbauer, E., Mayerhofer, M., Lavicza, Z., & Hohenwarter, M. (2021). Integrating Technologies Into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2057. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11428

Vancouver

Weinhandl R, Houghton T, Lindenbauer E, Mayerhofer M, Lavicza Z, Hohenwarter M. Integrating Technologies Into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(12):em2057. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11428

AMA

Weinhandl R, Houghton T, Lindenbauer E, Mayerhofer M, Lavicza Z, Hohenwarter M. Integrating Technologies Into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(12), em2057. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11428

Chicago

Weinhandl, Robert, Tony Houghton, Edith Lindenbauer, Martin Mayerhofer, Zsolt Lavicza, and Markus Hohenwarter. "Integrating Technologies Into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 12 (2021): em2057. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11428

Harvard

Weinhandl, R., Houghton, T., Lindenbauer, E., Mayerhofer, M., Lavicza, Z., and Hohenwarter, M. (2021). Integrating Technologies Into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2057. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11428

MLA

Weinhandl, Robert et al. "Integrating Technologies Into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 12, 2021, em2057. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11428