Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Anderson, J., White, P., & Wong, M. (2012). Mathematics curriculum in the schooling years. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. MacDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2008-2011 (pp. 219-244). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-970-1_11
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher–curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. State University of New York Press.
• Bergqvist, E., & Bergqvist, T. (2017). The role of the formal written curriculum in standards-based reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(2), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1202323
• Bergqvist, E., & Bergqvist, T. (2020) Teachers’ interpretations of the concept of problem–A link between written and intended reform curriculum. In M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri, & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Mathematics Education in the 4^th Industrial Revolution: Thinking Skills for the Future (pp. 19-27). PME.
• Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2014). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33(3), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001
• Breyfogle, M. L., Roth McDuffie, A., & Wohlhuter, K. A. (2010). Developing curricular reasoning for grades pre-K-12 mathematics instruction. In B. Reys, R. Reys, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future direction, 72^nd yearbook (pp. 307-320). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17-36). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884645-11
• Bümen, N. T., & Holmqvist, M. (2022). Teachers’ sense-making and adapting of the national curriculum: A multiple case study in Turkish and Swedish contexts. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(6), 832-851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2121178
• Cai, J., & Howson, G. (2013). Toward an international mathematics curriculum. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 949-974). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_29
• Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2010). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(3), 265-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9132-1
• Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302
• Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2009). Conceptualizing policy implementation: Large-scale reform in an era of complexity. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 348-361). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880968.ch28
• Davis, J., Choppin, J., Roth McDuffie, A., & Drake, C. (2013). Common core state standards for mathematics: Middle school mathematics teachers’ perceptions. The Warner Center for Professional Development and Education Reform.
• Deng, Z. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge reconceived: Bringing curriculum thinking into the conversation on teachers’ content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.021
• Dietiker, L., Males, L. M., Amador, J. M., & Earnest, D. (2018). Research commentary: Curricular noticing: A framework to describe teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(5), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.5.0521
• Dolma, P., Nutchey, D., Watters, J. J., & Chandra, V. (2018). Investigating the alignment of Bhutanese mathematics teachers’ planned approaches within the context of a reformed curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 581-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9791-1
• Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge.
• Grave, I., & Pepin, B. (2015). Teachers’ use of resources in and for mathematics teaching. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3-4), 199-222.
• Graybeal, C. D. (2010). Teachers’ senses of obligation to curricular messages. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning.
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147-179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023477131081
• Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9159-8
• Hajer, M., & Norén, E. (2017). Teachers’ knowledge about language in mathematics professional development courses: From an intended curriculum to a curriculum in action. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7b), 4087-4114. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00808a
• Hemmi, K., Bråting, K., & Lepik, M. (2021). Curricular approaches to algebra in Estonia, Finland and Sweden–A comparative study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1740857
• Hill, H. C. (2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 289-318. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002289
• Hodge, S. (2023). Curriculum work and hermeneutics. The Curriculum Journal, 35(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.214
• Højgaard, T., & Sølberg, J. (2023). Fostering competence: A narrative case study of developing a two-dimensional curriculum in Denmark. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(2), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2196570
• Kaur, B., Low, H. K. & Seah, L. H. (2006). Mathematics teaching in two Singapore classrooms: The role of the textbook and homework. In D. J. Clarke, C. Keitel, & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (pp. 99-115). Sense publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901622_008
• Land, T. J., Tyminski, A. M., & Drake, C. (2015). Examining pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ reading of educative curriculum materials. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.009
• Lee, K. H. (2010). Searching for Korean perspective on mathematics education through discussion on mathematical modeling. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 20(3), 221-239. [In Korean].
• Lee, K. H., Kim, D. W., Kim, S. H., Kim, H. M., Kim, H. K., Park, J. H., Lee, H., Lee, H. Y., Lim, H. M., Chang, J. W., Jung, C. S., Cho, S. M., Choi, Y. Y., & Song. C, K. (2021). A study on the future-oriented mathematics curriculum development for the post-COVID era. Ministry of Education [In Korean].
• Lee, K. H., Park, J. H., & Ku, N. Y. (2018). The Korean mathematics curriculum: Characteristics and challenges. In D. R. Thompson, M. A. Huntley, & C. Suurtamm (Eds.), International perspectives on mathematics curriculum (pp. 211-227). IAP.
• Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
• Luttenberg, J., Veen, K. V., & Imants, J. (2013). Looking for cohesion: The role of search for meaning in the interaction between teacher and reform. Research Papers in Education, 28(3), 289-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.630746
• März, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.004
• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education. Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 365-380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13
• Misfeldt, M., Tamborg, A. L., Dreyøe, J., & Allsopp, B. B. (2019). Tools, rules and teachers: The relationship between curriculum standards and resource systems when teaching mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 94, 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.12.001
• MOE. (2022). Mathematics curriculum: Proclamation of the Ministry of Education #2022-33. Ministry of Education.
• NCTM. (1980). An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980s. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
• Niss, M., Bruder, R., Planas, N., Turner, R., & Villa-Ochoa, J. A. (2016). Survey team on: Conceptualization of the role of competencies, knowing and knowledge in mathematics education research. ZDM, 48(5), 611-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0799-3
• NRC & MLSC. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822
• OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development.
• Paik, S. (2015). Teachers’ attention to curriculum materials and student contexts: The case of Korean middle school teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0175-4
• Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. ZDM, 45(7), 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2
• Petrou, M. & Goulding, M. (2011). Conceptualizing teachers’ mathematical knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 9-25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_2
• Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
• Prendergast, M., & Treacy, P. (2018). Curriculum reform in Irish secondary schools–A focus on algebra. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 126-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1313315
• Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00130
• Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1086/499645
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
• Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM, 46(5), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
• Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Publications.
• Roth McDuffie, A., Choppin, J., Drake, C., Davis, J. D., & Brown, J. (2018). Middle school teachers’ differing perceptions and use of curriculum materials and the common core. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(6), 545-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9368-0
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13(1), 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(94)90035-3
• Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270802696115
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
• Stein, M. K., & Kaufman, J. H. (2010). Selecting and supporting the use of mathematics curricula at scale. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 663-693. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361210
• Sunzuma, G., & Luneta, K. (2023). Zimbabwean mathematics pre-service teachers’ implementation of the learner-centered curriculum during teaching practice. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2258. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13131
• Tran, D., & O’Connor, B. R. (2023). Teacher curriculum competence: How teachers act in curriculum making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2271541
• van den Akker, J. (2013). Curricular development research as a specimen of educational design research. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research: Illustrative cases (pp. 52-71). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
• Watson, J. M. (2001). Profiling teachers’ competence and confidence to teach particular mathematics topics: The case of chance and data. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(4), 305-337. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013383110860
• Yang, K. L., & Liu, X. Y. (2019). Exploratory study on Taiwanese secondary teachers’ critiques of mathematics textbooks. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), em1655. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99515
• Zhang, Q., & Stephens, M. (2013). Utilizing a construct of teacher capacity to examine national curriculum reform in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 481-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0072-9
• Zhang, Q., & Stephens, M. (2016). Profiling teacher capacity in statistical thinking of national curriculum reform: A comparative study between Australia and China. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 733-746. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1225a

APA

Song, C.-G., & Lee, K.-H. (2024). How teachers’ reading of competency-oriented national mathematics curriculum documents relates to their sense-making of reform messages. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), em2465. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14705

Vancouver

Song CG, Lee KH. How teachers’ reading of competency-oriented national mathematics curriculum documents relates to their sense-making of reform messages. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(7):em2465. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14705

AMA

Song CG, Lee KH. How teachers’ reading of competency-oriented national mathematics curriculum documents relates to their sense-making of reform messages. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(7), em2465. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14705

Chicago

Song, Chang-Geun, and Kyeong-Hwa Lee. "How teachers’ reading of competency-oriented national mathematics curriculum documents relates to their sense-making of reform messages". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 7 (2024): em2465. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14705

Harvard

Song, C.-G., and Lee, K.-H. (2024). How teachers’ reading of competency-oriented national mathematics curriculum documents relates to their sense-making of reform messages. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), em2465. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14705

MLA

Song, Chang-Geun et al. "How teachers’ reading of competency-oriented national mathematics curriculum documents relates to their sense-making of reform messages". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 7, 2024, em2465. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14705