Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Aydarov, V. I., & Krasilnikov, V. I. (2017). The role of the moral component of personality in ensuring security in medicine. Vestnik NTSBGD, 2(32), 117-121.
• Baig, L. A., & Violato, C. (2012). Temporal stability of objective structured clinical exams: a longitudinal study employing item response theory. BMC Medical Education, 12(121), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-121.
• Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Item response theory. Parameter estimation techniques. New York: Dekker. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482276725.
• Berk, R. A. (1980). Criterion-referenced measurement: The state of art. Baltimor: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Chelyshkova, M. (2002). Theory and practice of educational tests construction: the manual. Moscow: Logos.
• Chelyshkova, M. B., Semenova, T. V., Naydenova, N. N., Dorozhkin, E. M., Malygin, A. A., & Akhunov, V. V. (2018). Сross-analysis of big data in accreditation of health specialists. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 15(5), em72. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/93469.
• Cohen, A. S., Kim, S. H., & Baker, F. B. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning in the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169301700402.
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2010). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Under the editorship of V. I. Zvonnikov and M. B. Chelyshkova. Moscow: Logos Publ.
• De Ayala, R. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: Guilford Press.
• Dorans, N. J., & Kulick, E. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1986.tb00255.x.
• Dorozhkin, E. M, Chelyshkova, M. B., Malygin, A. A., Toymentseva, I. A., & Anopchenko, T. Y. (2016). Innovative approaches to increasing the student assessment procedures effectiveness. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7129-7144.
• Filaretov, V. A., Danilov, V. A., & Golovchenko, N. I. (2014). Prevention of burnout syndrome. Vestnik NTSBGD, 1(19), 63-66.
• Gorbatkova, E. Yu., & Zabrodina, G. Yu. (2015). Student lifestyle and health. Vestnik NTSBGD, 3(25), 102-104.
• Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential Item Functioning. London: Routledge.
• Keeves, J. P. (1988). Edukational Reseach Methodology, and Measurement. New York: Perg. Press.
• Kramer, D. (2007). Mathematical data processing in social sciences: modern methods: studies. The grant for students of higher educational institutions. Мoscow: Publishing Centre “Academy”.
• Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks. California: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.
• Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1989). Mantel-Haenszel DIF and PROX are Equivalent! Rasch Measurement Transactions, 3(2), 51–53.
• Lord, F. M. (1980). Application of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
• Naydenova, N. N. (2003). Formation of representative samples. Moscow: Logos.
• Naydenova, N. N., Tagunova, I. A., & Sukhin, I. G. (2018). The Problem of Interpretation in Comparative Education (Interdisciplinary Approach). International Conference “Education Environment for the Information Age” (EEIA-2018), 05-06 June 2018, pp. 485-492. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.09.02.56.
• Penfield, R. D., & Camilli, G. (2007). Differential item functioning and item bias, in Handbook of statistics. New York: Elsevier.
• Semenova, T., Sizova, Zh., Chelyshkova, M., Dorozhkin, Е., & Malygin, A. (2018). Fairness and Quality of Data in Healthcare Professionals’ Accreditation. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 15(5), em72. Retrieved from www.mjltm.org.
• Semenova, T., Sizova, Zh., Zvonnikov, V., Masalimova, A., & Ersozlu, Z. (2017). The Development of Model and Measuring Tool for Specialists Accreditation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6779–6788. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77042.
• Tumeneva, J., & Valdman, A. (2012). The first data from comparative analysis of the results on TIMSS-2011 and PISA – 2012 tests, administered to the same sample of Russian students. International Conference “Russian Education in the Mirror of the International Comparative Studies”. Retrieved from http://centeroko.ru/conf2013/conf2013_eng.html.
• Woods, C.M. (2011). DIF testing for ordinal items with Poly-SIBTEST, the mantel and GMH tests, and IRT-LR-DIF when the latent distribution is non-normal for both groups. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621610377450.
• Yazdani, S., Azandehi, S.K., Ghorbani, A., & Shakerian, S. (2018). Explaining the process of choosing clinical specialties in general medical graduates: A grounded theory. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 15(6), em89. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/93457.
• Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning. Ottawa: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.

APA

Sizova, Z. M., Semenova, T. V., Naydenova, N. N., Narbut, V. V., Chelyshkova, M. B., & Masalimova, A. R. (2019). Fairness Principle in Accreditation of Health Specialists: The Differential Item Functioning Method. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), em1749. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108485

Vancouver

Sizova ZM, Semenova TV, Naydenova NN, Narbut VV, Chelyshkova MB, Masalimova AR. Fairness Principle in Accreditation of Health Specialists: The Differential Item Functioning Method. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(9):em1749. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108485

AMA

Sizova ZM, Semenova TV, Naydenova NN, Narbut VV, Chelyshkova MB, Masalimova AR. Fairness Principle in Accreditation of Health Specialists: The Differential Item Functioning Method. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(9), em1749. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108485

Chicago

Sizova, Zhanna M., Tatyana V. Semenova, Natalia N. Naydenova, Victoria V. Narbut, Marina B. Chelyshkova, and Alfiya R. Masalimova. "Fairness Principle in Accreditation of Health Specialists: The Differential Item Functioning Method". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 9 (2019): em1749. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108485

Harvard

Sizova, Z. M., Semenova, T. V., Naydenova, N. N., Narbut, V. V., Chelyshkova, M. B., and Masalimova, A. R. (2019). Fairness Principle in Accreditation of Health Specialists: The Differential Item Functioning Method. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), em1749. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108485

MLA

Sizova, Zhanna M. et al. "Fairness Principle in Accreditation of Health Specialists: The Differential Item Functioning Method". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 9, 2019, em1749. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108485