Factors Predicting Turkish and Korean Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement in TIMSS 2011

Mustafa Sami Topçu; Evrim Erbilgin; Serkan Arikan

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a

Full Text (PDF)

Mustafa Sami Topçu ¹ ^* , Evrim Erbilgin ², Serkan Arikan ²

More Detail

¹ Yildiz Technical University² Mugla Sitki Kocman University^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study makes an important contribution to an expanding body of international comparative studies by exploring factors predicting differences in science and mathematics achievement by students in Turkey and the Republic of Korea on the 2011 TIMSS assessment. While these countries are similar with regards to population size, cultural beliefs about education, and public expenditure on education, students in each country have different levels of achievement in science and mathematics. The current research investigated how aptitude, instruction, and environment related factors predict Turkish and Korean students’ achievement in science and mathematics. In both countries, some factors, such as student aptitude (e.g., science self-efficacy) and environmental (e.g., parental educational level) factors significantly predicted students’ science and mathematics achievement. However, we found some differences between the two countries regarding certain classroom environmental variables, such as bullying and student sense of belonging at school. We discuss educational implications for these findings.

Keywords

student aptitude variables
instructional variables
environmental variables
mathematics achievement
science achievement
TIMSS 2011

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 12, Issue 7, July 2016, 1711-1737

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a

Publication date: 04 Apr 2016

Article Views: 3751

Article Downloads: 1732

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Akiba, M., & Han, S. (2007). Academic differentiation, school achievement, and school violence in the U.S. and South Korea. Compare, 37(2), 201-219.
Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(4), 369–387.
Akyüz, G. (2014). The effects of student and school factors on mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. Education and Science, 39(172), 150-162.
Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182–192.
Alikasifoglu, M., Erginoz, E., Ercan, O., Uysal, O., & Albayrak-Kaymak, D. (2007). Bullying behaviours and psychosocial health: results from a cross-sectional survey among high school students in Istanbul, Turkey. European Journal of Pediatrics, 166(12), 1253- 1260.
Annetta, L. A., Cheng, M.-T., & Holmes, S. (2010). Assessing twenty-first century skills through a teacher created video game for high school biology teachers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 28(2), 101–114.
Arikan, S. (2014). A Regression Model with a New Tool: IDB Analyzer for Identifying Factors Predicting Mathematics Performance Using PISA 2012 Indices. US-China Education Review, 4(10), 716-727.
Bae, D., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2014). Family socioeconomic status and academic achievement among Korean adolescents: Linking mechanisms of family processes and adolescents' time use. The Journal of Early Adolescence. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0272431614549627.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D. T., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 59–82.
Benner, A. D., & Mistry, R. S. (2007). Congruence of mother and teacher educational expectations and low-income youth’s academic competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 140–153.
Berberoğlu, G., Çelebi, Ö., Özdemir, E., Uysal, E., & Yayan, B. (2003). Factors affecting achievement level of Turkish students in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Educational Sciences and Practice, 2(3), 3-14.
Buckley, J. (2009). Cross-national response styles in international educational assessments: Evidence from PISA 2006. Retrieved January 05, 2015, from https://edsurveys.rti.org/PISA/documents/Buckley_PISAresponsestyle.pdf
Ceylan, E., & Berberoğlu, G. (2007). Ogrencilerin Fen Basarilarini Aciklayan Etmenler: Bir Modelleme Calismasi. Education and Science, 32, 36-48.
Chen, S. F., Lin, C. Y., Wang, J. R., Lin, S. W., & Kao, H. L. (2012). A cross-grade comparison to examine the context effect on the relationships among family resources, school climate, learning participation, science attitude, and science achievement based on TIMSS 2003 in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2089-2106.
Chevalier, A., & Lanot, G. (2002). The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational achievement. Education Economics, 10(2), 165–181.
Çuhadar, A., & Sarı, M. (2007). Göç yollarında eğitim: İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin okula ilişkin algılarının göç bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri. Adana, Turkey.
Engin-Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 17–29.
Fuchs, T., & Wößmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32, 433–464.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gumus, S., & Atalmis, E. H. (2012). Achievement gaps between different school types and regions in Turkey: Have they changed over time? Mevlana International Journal of Education, 2(2), 50-66.
Harel-Fisch, Y., Walsh, S. D., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Amitai, G., Pickett, W., Molcho, M., Due, P., de Matos, M. G., Craig, W., & Members of the HBSC Violence and Injury Prevention Focus Group (2011). Negative school perceptions and involvement in school bullying: A universal relationship across 40 countries. Journal of Adolescence 34, 639–652.
Hassan, G. (2008). Attitudes toward science among Australian tertiary and secondary school students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(2), 129-147.
Hong, H. K. (2012). Trends in mathematics and science performance in 18 countries: Multiple regression analysis of the cohort effects of TIMSS 1995-2007. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20 (33). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1012.
House, J. D. (2005). Classroom instruction and science achievement in Japan, Hong Kong, and Chinese Taipei: Results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32, 295-311.
House, J. D. (2008). Science beliefs, instructional strategies, and life sciences achievement in Japan: Results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(1), 103–113.
House, D. J., & Telese, J. A. (2013). Mathematics instruction and achievement of eighth-grade students in Korea: Results from the TIMSS 2007 assessment. Education, 134(2), 266- 270.
Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2012). Sample design in TIMSS and PIRLS. In Martin, M.O. & Mullis, I.V.S. (Eds.). (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Kaya, S., & Rice, D. C. (2010). Multilevel effects of student and classroom factors on elementary science achievement in five countries. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1337-1363.
Kepenekci, Y. K., & Çınkır, Ş. (2006). Bullying among Turkish high school students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(2), 193-204.
Kloosterman, P. (1991). Beliefs and achievement in seventh-grade mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(3), 3-15.
Kramer, K. Z. (2012). Parental behavioural control and academic achievement: striking the balance between control and involvement. Research in Education, 88, 85-98.
Lai, S. H., Ye, R., & Chang, K. P. (2008). Bullying in middle schools: An Asian-pacific regional study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 393-405.
Lamb, S., & Fullarton, S. (2002). Classroom and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: A Comparative study of Australia and the United States using TIMSS. Australian Journal of Education, 46(2), 154-173.
Ma, X. (2003). Measuring up: Academic performance of Canadian immigrant children in reading, mathematics and science. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 4(4), 541–576.
Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 27-47.
Ma, X., & Wang, J. (2001). A confirmatory examination of Walberg's model of educational productivity in student career aspiration. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 443-453.
McWayne, C., Hampton, V., Fantuzzo, J., Cohen, H., L., & Sekino, Y. (2004). A multivariate examination of parent involvement and the social and academic competencies of urban kindergarten children. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 363-377.
Ministry of National Education (2013). National Education Statistics: Formal Education 2013- 2014. Retrieved from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/milli-egitim-istatistikleri-orgunegitim-2013-2014/icerik/95.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grade. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Minnich, C. A., Stanco, G. M., Arora, A., Centurino, V. A. S., & Castle, C. E. (eds.) (2012). TIMSS 2011 Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Mathematics and Science (Volumes 1 and 2). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 Assessment Frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Ozdemir, M. (2012). Examination of high school students’ metaphorical school perceptions in terms of various variables. Education and Science, 37(163), 96-109.
Paik, S. J. (2004). Korean and US families, school and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(1), 71–90.
Park, H., Byun, S., & Kim, K. (2011). Parental involvement and students’ cognitive outcomes in Korea: Focusing on private tutoring. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 3-22.
Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of high school mathematics outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 150-158.
Saban, A. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenci Kavramına İlişkin Sahip Oldukları Zihinsel İmgeler. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 281-326.
Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., Stuart, P. E., & Merle-Johnson, D. (2013). Game-Based Curricula in Biology Classes: Differential Effects among Varying Academic Levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 479–499.
Sharp, S. (1995). How much does bullying hurt? The effects of bullying on the personal wellbeing and educational progress of secondary aged students. Educational and Child Psychology, 12, 81–88.
Shen, C., & Tam, H. P. (2008). The paradoxical relationship between student achievement and self-perception: a cross-national analysis based on three waves of TIMSS data. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 14(1), 87-100.
Shumow, L., & Miller, J. D. (2001). Parents’ at-home and at-school academic involvement with young adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(1), 68–91.
Singh, K., Chang, M., & Dika, S. (2005/2006). Affective motivational factors in engagement and achievement in science. International Journal of Learning, 12(6), 207-218.
So, K. & Kang, J. (2014). Curriculum reform in Korea: Issues and challenges for twenty-first century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 795-803.
Sousa, S., Park, E. J., & Armor, D. J. (2012). Comparing effects of family and school factors on cross-national academic achievement using the 2009 and 2006 PISA surveys. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14(5), 449-468.
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A crosscase analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339-355.
Sui-Chu, E. H., & Willms, J. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 126–141.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education.
Tansel, A. (2013). Supplementary education in Turkey: Recent developments and future prospects. In J. Aurini, S. Davies and J. Dierkes (eds), Out of the shadows? An Introduction to world-wide supplementary education. (pp. 23–66). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
The IEA International Database Analyzer (IDB Analyzer, Version 3.1) [Computer software and manual]. (2013). Hamburg, Germany: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Topçu, M. S. (2014). The Achievement Gap in Science and Mathematics: A Turkish Perspective. In Clark, J. V. Closing the Achievement Gap from an International Perspective. Transforming STEM for Effective Education. (pp. 193-213). Springer.
Topçu, M. S., Arıkan, S., & Erbilgin, E. (2015). Turkish Students’ Science Performance and Related Factors in PISA 2006 and 2009. The Australian Educational Researcher, 42(1), 117-132.
Walberg, H. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In: F. H. Farley & N. Gorden (Eds) Psychology and education, pp. 81–108. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.
Walberg, H. J. (2004). Improving educational productivity: An assessment of extant research. The LSS Review, 3(2), 11-14.
Wilkins, J. L. M., Zembylas, M., & Travers, K. J. (2002). Investigating correlates of mathematics and science literacy in the final year of secondary school. In D. F Robataille & A. E. Beaton (Eds.), Secondary analysis of the TIMSS data (pp. 291-316). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Willms, J. D. (2003). Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Accessed January 2013 from. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/ 33689437.pdf
Wolf, F. M., & Blixt, S. L. (1981). A cross-sectional cross-lagged panel analysis of mathematics achievement and attitudes: Implications for the interpretation of the direction of predictive validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 829-834.
Woods, S., & Wolke, D. (2004). Direct and relational bullying among primary school children and academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 135–155.
Young, D., Reynolds, A., & Walberg, H. (1996). Science achievement and educational productivity: A hierarchical linear model. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 272–287.

How to cite this article

APA

Topçu, M. S., Erbilgin, E., & Arikan, S. (2016). Factors Predicting Turkish and Korean Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement in TIMSS 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1711-1737. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a

Vancouver

Topçu MS, Erbilgin E, Arikan S. Factors Predicting Turkish and Korean Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement in TIMSS 2011. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(7):1711-37. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a

AMA

Topçu MS, Erbilgin E, Arikan S. Factors Predicting Turkish and Korean Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement in TIMSS 2011. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(7), 1711-1737. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a

Chicago

Topçu, Mustafa Sami, Evrim Erbilgin, and Serkan Arikan. "Factors Predicting Turkish and Korean Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement in TIMSS 2011". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 7 (2016): 1711-1737. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a

Harvard

Topçu, M. S., Erbilgin, E., and Arikan, S. (2016). Factors Predicting Turkish and Korean Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement in TIMSS 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), pp. 1711-1737. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a

MLA

Topçu, Mustafa Sami et al. "Factors Predicting Turkish and Korean Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement in TIMSS 2011". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 7, 2016, pp. 1711-1737. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a