Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310206.
• Bar, V. (1989). Children’s views about the water cycle. Science Education, 73, 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730730409.
• Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280409.
• Borges, A. T., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290859.
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Çepni, S., & Keles, E. (2006). Turkish students’ conceptions about the simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9001-z.
• Dai, H. Q., Zhang, F., & Chen, X. F. (2005). Mental and educational measurement. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.
• Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070333.
• Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9102-y.
• Gönen, S. (2008). A Study on student teachers’ misconceptions and scientifically acceptable conceptions about mass and gravity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9083-1.
• Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770107.
• Johnstone, A. H., & Mughol, A. R. (1978). The Concept of Electric resistance. Physics Education, 13(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/13/1/319.
• Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the Role of Cognitive Conflict in Science Concept Learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3.
• Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2008). Effect of simple electric circuits teaching on conceptual change in grade 9 physics course. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1), 59-74.
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakatos, I. (1994). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worralland, & G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers (Vol. I) (pp. 8-101). Cambridge University Press.
• McDermott, L., & Schaffer, P. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: an example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of students understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60(11), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17003.
• Merlin, J., Maisha, J.M., & Max, C. (2016). The Impact of an Interactive Ray Diagram Teaching Module in Enhancing Grade 11 Learners’ Conceptual Understanding of Image Formation in a Plane Mirror. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(3): 637-653.
• Ministry of education of the people’s republic of China. (2001). The physics curriculum standard of the full-time compulsory education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
• Park, J., & Kim, I. (1998). Analysis of students’ responses to contradictory results obtained by simple observation or controlling variables. Research in Science Education, 28(3), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461569.
• Peng, Q. C., & Du, M. (2006a). Physics I (8th grade). Beijing: Peoples Education Press.
• Peng, Q. C., & Du, M. (2006b). Physics II (8th grade). Beijing: Peoples Education Press.
• Pines, A. L., & West, L. H. T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: an interpretation of research within a source-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70(5), 583-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730700510.
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207.
• Ross, K. E., & Shuell, T. J. (1993). Children’s beliefs about earthquakes. Science Education, 77, 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770207.
• Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 503-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300508.
• Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1994). The Nature of Fourth Graders’ Understandings of Electric Circuits. Science Education, 78 (5), 489-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780505.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 247–260). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_12.
• Stockmayer, S. M., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). A historical analysis of electric currents in textbooks: A Century of Influence on Physics Education, Science & Education, 3, 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486388.
• Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl, & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive science, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Viard, J., & Khantine-Langlois, F. (2001). The concept of electric resistance: How Cassirer’s philosophy, and the early developments of electric circuit theory, allow a better understanding of students’ learning difficulties. Science & Education, 10, 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008712903985.
• Wang, J. Y., Jou, M., Lv, Y. Z., & Huang, C. C. (2018). An investigation on teaching performances of model-based flipping classroom for physics supported by modern teaching technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.018.
• Wang, X. L. (2005). Educational measurement. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
• White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110509.
• Yan, J. D., & Wang, X. C. (2006). Physics (9th grade). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
• Yuruk, N., Beeth, M. E., & Andersen, C. (2009). Analyzing the effect of metaconceptual teaching practices on students’ understanding of force and motion concepts. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 449-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9089-6.

APA

Jiang, T., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Ma, Y. (2018). Effect of Different Instructional Methods on Students’ Conceptual Change Regarding Electrical Resistance as Viewed from a Synthesized Theoretical Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2771-2786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592

Vancouver

Jiang T, Wang S, Wang J, Ma Y. Effect of Different Instructional Methods on Students’ Conceptual Change Regarding Electrical Resistance as Viewed from a Synthesized Theoretical Framework. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(7):2771-86. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592

AMA

Jiang T, Wang S, Wang J, Ma Y. Effect of Different Instructional Methods on Students’ Conceptual Change Regarding Electrical Resistance as Viewed from a Synthesized Theoretical Framework. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(7), 2771-2786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592

Chicago

Jiang, Tao, Sanjun Wang, Jingying Wang, and Yongjun Ma. "Effect of Different Instructional Methods on Students’ Conceptual Change Regarding Electrical Resistance as Viewed from a Synthesized Theoretical Framework". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 7 (2018): 2771-2786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592

Harvard

Jiang, T., Wang, S., Wang, J., and Ma, Y. (2018). Effect of Different Instructional Methods on Students’ Conceptual Change Regarding Electrical Resistance as Viewed from a Synthesized Theoretical Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), pp. 2771-2786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592

MLA

Jiang, Tao et al. "Effect of Different Instructional Methods on Students’ Conceptual Change Regarding Electrical Resistance as Viewed from a Synthesized Theoretical Framework". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 7, 2018, pp. 2771-2786. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90592