Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alonzo, A., & Kim. J. (2016). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1259-1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/Tea.21271
• Anthony, G., Hunter, J., & Hunter, R. (2015). Prospective teachers development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.010
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2022). Australian curriculum (version 9.0). https://acara.edu.au/curriculum
• Baldinger, E. E., & Munson, J. (2020). Developing adaptive expertise in the wake of rehearsals: An emergent model of the debrief discussions of non-rehearsing teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 95, 103125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103125
• Beltramo, J. L. (2017). Developing adaptive teaching practices through participation in cogenerative dialogues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.007
• Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40-87). Jossey Boss.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
• Campbell, C., Vale, C., & Speldewinde, C. (2023). Teaching science out-of-field: Beliefs and practices. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education 4(2) 133-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/ ejmse.4.2.133
• Carbonell, K. B., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2014). How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review, 12, 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.03.001
• Chan, K. (2021). Using classroom video-based instruments to characterize pre-service science teachers’ incoming usable knowledge for teaching science, Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(1), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1872517
• Chan, K. Xu, L., Cooper, R., Berry, A. & van Driel, J. (2021). Teacher noticing in science education: do you see what I see? Studies in Science Education 57(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267. 2020.1755803
• Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., O’Connor, M. C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades K-6. Math Solutions.
• Choy, B. H., & Dindyal, J. (2021). Productive teacher noticing and affordances of typical problems, ZDM-Mathematics Education, 53, 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01203-4
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Rodrigues, J. (2021). Content-specific noticing: A large-scale survey of mathematics teachers’ noticing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103320
• Estapa, A., & Amador, J. (2023). A qualitative metasynthesis of video-based prompts and noticing in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00378-7
• Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children’s mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 148-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/749608
• Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). Jossey-Bass.
• Han, C., Kim, H. J., Kwon, O. N., & Lim, W. (2023). Exploring changes of mathematics teachers’ noticing in a video club: Identifying turning points. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 835-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10251-z
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azama, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). Freeman.
• Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008026
• Hughes, S., Russo, J., Mansfield, J., Green, A., Jones, D., Vale, C. & Berry, A. (2022) Co-designing integrated mathematics and science lesson learning sequences for primary education, International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 30(4), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.30. 04.005
• Kersting, N., Given, B., Thompson, B., Santagata, R., & Stigler, J. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge: Teachers analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 568-589. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212437853
• Liljedahl, P. (2016). Building thinking classrooms: Conditions for problem-solving. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems: Advances and new perspectives (pp. 361-386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_21
• Mason, J. (2010). Effective questioning and responding in the mathematics classroom. In G. Ineson, & H. Povey (Eds.), Debates in mathematics education. Routledge.
• McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson.
• Osborne, J. (2023). Science, scientific literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education Volume III (pp. 785-816). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-30
• Parsons, S. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: Case studies of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12440261
• Pynes, D., Empson, S., & Jacobs, V. (2020). Supporting teachers in the development of noticing children’s mathematical thinking with a web-based tool. In H. Borko, & D. Potari (Ed.), Teachers of mathematics working and learning together in collaborative groups (pp. 676-683). International Commission on Mathematics Instruction.
• Sherman, D. (2020). Eliciting student thinking in support of adaptive expertise in teacher candidates. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(11), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i11.3765
• Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. J. (2021). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: Shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 469-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00313-2
• Soslau, E. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 768-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.009
• Stockero, S. L., Rupnow, R. L., & Pascoe, A. E. (2017). Learning to notice important student mathematical thinking in complex classroom interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.006
• Suh, J. K., Hand, B., Dursun, J. E., Lammert, C., & Fulmer, G. (2023). Characterizing adaptive teaching expertise: Teacher profiles based on epistemic orientation and knowledge of epistemic tools. Science Education, 107(4), 884-911. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21796
• Timms, M., Moyle, K., Weldon, P., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools. Policy Insights, 7.
• Timperley, H., & Twyford, K. (2022a). Adaptive expertise in educational leadership: Embracing complexity in leading today’s schools. Australian Educational Leader, 44(1), 8-12.
• Timperley, H., & Twyford, K. (2022b). Building a learning culture through the attributes of adaptive expertise. Australian Educational Leader, 44(2), 8-16.
• Tytler, R., & Aranda, G. (2015). Expert teachers’ discursive moves in science classroom interactive talk. International Journal of Science And Mathematics Education, 13, 425-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-015-9617-6
• Tytler, R., & Ferguson, J. P. (2023). Student attitudes, identity, and aspirations towards science. In N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education volume III (pp. 158-192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-8
• Vale, C., Campbell, C., & White, P. (2021). Secondary teachers crossing subject boundaries to teach mathematics out-of-field: Evolving practices and beliefs. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00323-0
• Valli. L, (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7201_4
• van Es, E., & Sherin, M. (2021). Expanding on prior conceptions of teacher noticing. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 53, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01211-4
• Yoon, S. A., Evans, C., Miller, K., Anderson, E., & Koehler, J. (2019). Validating a model for assessing science teacher’s adaptive expertise with computer-supported complex systems curricula and its relationship to student learning outcomes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 890-905. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1646063
• Yoon, S., Koehler-Yom, J., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Klopfer, E. (2015). Using an adaptive expertise lens to understand the quality of teachers’ classroom implementation of computer-supported complex systems curricula in high school science. Research in Science and Technology Education, 33(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1031099

APA

Vale, C., Kim, G., Widjaja, W., Ferguson, J. P., Berry, A., van Driel, J., Xu, L., & Pham, L. (2024). Designing a video-stimulated questionnaire about teachers’ adaptive expertise in interdisciplinary mathematics and science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2418. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14355

Vancouver

Vale C, Kim G, Widjaja W, Ferguson JP, Berry A, van Driel J, et al. Designing a video-stimulated questionnaire about teachers’ adaptive expertise in interdisciplinary mathematics and science teaching. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4):em2418. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14355

AMA

Vale C, Kim G, Widjaja W, et al. Designing a video-stimulated questionnaire about teachers’ adaptive expertise in interdisciplinary mathematics and science teaching. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4), em2418. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14355

Chicago

Vale, Colleen, Gahyoung Kim, Wanty Widjaja, Joseph Paul Ferguson, Amanda Berry, Jan van Driel, Lihua Xu, and Lam Pham. "Designing a video-stimulated questionnaire about teachers’ adaptive expertise in interdisciplinary mathematics and science teaching". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 4 (2024): em2418. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14355

Harvard

Vale, C., Kim, G., Widjaja, W., Ferguson, J. P., Berry, A., van Driel, J., . . . Pham, L. (2024). Designing a video-stimulated questionnaire about teachers’ adaptive expertise in interdisciplinary mathematics and science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2418. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14355

MLA

Vale, Colleen et al. "Designing a video-stimulated questionnaire about teachers’ adaptive expertise in interdisciplinary mathematics and science teaching". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 4, 2024, em2418. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14355