Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Akasaka, H., Nimiya, H., & Soga, K. (2002). Influence of heat island phenomenon on build heat load. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol., 23(4), 269–278.
• Battistoni, E., Colladon, A. F., Scarabotti, L., & Schiraldi, M. M. (2013). Analytic hierarchy process for new product development. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., 5, 1–8.
• Bluyssen, P. M., de Richemont, S., Crump, D., Maupetit, F., Witterseh, T., & Gadjos, P. (2010) Actions to reduce the impact of construction products on interior air: Outcomes of the European project healthy air. Interior Built Environ., 19(3), 327–339.
• Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods, 14(5), 1–6.
• Chen, C. F. (2006) Applying the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach to convention site selection. J. Travel Res., 45(2), 167–174.
• Cohen, B. C. (1996). Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making? Med. Decis. Mak., 16(1), 1–6.
• David, P., & Pierson, M. M. (1998). Public affairs decision making in the U.S. air force: An application of multiattribute utility theory. J. Mass Communicat. Quart., 75(3), 606–626.
• De Urioste-Stone, S., McLaughlin, W. J., & Sanyal, N. (2006). Using the Delphi technique to identify topics for a protected area co-management capacity building programme. Int. J. Rural Manage., 2(2), 191–211.
• Escaron, A. L., Chang Weir, R., Stanton, P., Vangala, S., Grogan, T. R., & Clarke, R. M. (2016). Testing an adapted modified Delphi method synthesizing multiple stakeholder ratings of health care service effectiveness. Health Promo. Prac., 17(2), 217–225.
• Farmer, T. A. (1993). Testing the effect of risk attitude on auditor judgments using multiattribute utility theory. J. Accoun. Audit. Finan., 8(1), 91–110.
• Fokaides, P. A., Kylili, A., Nicolaou, L., & Ioannou, B. (2016). The effect of soil sealing on the urban heat island phenomenon. Interior Built Environ., 25(7), 1136–1147.
• Gerber, J. K., & Yacoubian, G. S. (2002). An assessment of drug testing within the construction industry. J. Drug Educ., 32(1), 53–68.
• Hsueh, S. L. (2012). A fuzzy utility-based multi-criteria model for evaluating households’ energy conservation performance: A Taiwanese case study. Energies, 5(8), 2818–2834.
• Hsueh, S. L. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of community-promoted environmental protection policy by using a Delphi-fuzzy method: A case study on solar power and plain afforestation in Taiwan. Renew. Sust. Ener. Rev., 49, 1286–1295.
• Jacobs, J. M., & Cairns, S. (2008). The modern touch: Interior design and modernisation in post-independence Singapore. Environ. Plan. A, 40, 572–595.
• Kucukvar, M., Egilmez, G., & Tatari, O. (2014). Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis. Waste Manage. Res., 32(6), 500–508.
• Lakshmana, C. M. (2014). Dynamics of urban growth, resource degradation and environmental pollution in million plus cities of India. Environ. Urban. ASIA, 5(1), 49–61.
• Lee, S. E., & Levermore, G. J. (2012). Simulating urban heat island effect with climate change on a Manchester house. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol., 34(2), 203–221.
• Levermore, G. J., & Parkinson, J. B. (2016). An empirical model for the urban heat island intensity for a site in Manchester. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol., 38(1), 21–31.
• Li, L., Tang, D., Kong, Y., Yang, Y., & Liu, D. (2016). Spatial analysis of haze–fog pollution in China. Ener. Environ., 27(6-7), 726–740.
• Liefner, I., & Jessberger, S. (2016). The use of the analytic hierarchy process as a method of comparing innovation across regions: The examples of the equipment manufacturing industries of Shanghai and Xiamen, China. Environ. Plan. A, 48(6), 1188–1208.
• Luce, R. D. (1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 4, 178–191.
• Novakowski, N., & Wellar, B. (2009). Using the Delphi technique in normative planning research: Methodological design considerations. Environ. Plan. A, 40(6), 1485–1500.
• Ojeda-Benítez, S., Aguilar-Virgen, Q., Taboada-González, P., & Cruz-Sotelo, S. E. (2013). Household hazardous wastes as a potential source of pollution: A generation study. Waste Manage. Res., 31(12), 1279–1284.
• Plassmann, F., & Khanna, N. (2006). Household income and pollution-implications for the debate about the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. J. Environ. Dev., 15(1), 22–41.
• Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environment concern, and environment behavior: A study into household energy use. Environ. Behav., 36(1), 70–93.
• Sellappan, E., & Janakiraman, K. (2014). Environmental noise from construction site power systems and its mitigation. Noise Vibrat. World., 45(3), 14–20.
• Smith, T. R., & Clark, W. A. V. (1982). Housing market search behavior and expected utility theory: 1. measuring preferences for housing. Environ. Plan. A, 14(5), 681–698.
• Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration. (2017). Statistics of total greenhouse gas emission. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=10052&ctNode=31352&mp=epa.
• White, W. C., & Kuehl, M. H. (2002). The role of contamination textiles in interior environment pollution. J. Indus. Text., 32(1), 23–43.
• Wu, W. C., & Perng, Y. H. (2017). AHP–utility based model for evaluating the comfort of housing: A case study of Taiwan. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 15(2), 133–144.
• Yun, J. S. (2004). Model for measuring Korean administrative corruption: Focusing on the application of the AHP method. Int. Area Stud. Rev., 7(1), 221–245.
• Zheng, Q., Lee, D., Lee, S., Kim, J. T., & Kim, S. (2011). A health performance evaluation model of apartment building interior air quality. Interior Built Environ., 20(1), 26–35.

APA

Chen, Y.-L., Cheng, A.-C., Hsueh, S.-L., & Qu, D. (2017). DAHP Expected Utility Based Evaluation Model for Management Performance on Interior Environmental Decoration – An Example in Taiwan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(12), 8257-8265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78635

Vancouver

Chen YL, Cheng AC, Hsueh SL, Qu D. DAHP Expected Utility Based Evaluation Model for Management Performance on Interior Environmental Decoration – An Example in Taiwan. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(12):8257-65. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78635

AMA

Chen YL, Cheng AC, Hsueh SL, Qu D. DAHP Expected Utility Based Evaluation Model for Management Performance on Interior Environmental Decoration – An Example in Taiwan. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(12), 8257-8265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78635

Chicago

Chen, Yu-Lung, Ai-Chih Cheng, Sung-Lin Hsueh, and Danji Qu. "DAHP Expected Utility Based Evaluation Model for Management Performance on Interior Environmental Decoration – An Example in Taiwan". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 12 (2017): 8257-8265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78635

Harvard

Chen, Y.-L., Cheng, A.-C., Hsueh, S.-L., and Qu, D. (2017). DAHP Expected Utility Based Evaluation Model for Management Performance on Interior Environmental Decoration – An Example in Taiwan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(12), pp. 8257-8265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78635

MLA

Chen, Yu-Lung et al. "DAHP Expected Utility Based Evaluation Model for Management Performance on Interior Environmental Decoration – An Example in Taiwan". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 12, 2017, pp. 8257-8265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78635