Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alpers, B. (2010). Studies on the mathematical expertise of mechanical engineers. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(3), 2-17.
• Alpers, B. (2013a). The SEFI Mathematics Working Group’s new Curriculum Framework Document. In L. Froyen (Ed.), Proceedings from the 41th SEFI Conference, 16-20 September 2013, Leuven, Belgium. Leuven: SEFI, European Association for Engineering Education.
• Alpers, B. (Ed.) (2013b). A framework for mathematics curricula in engineering education. A report of the Mathematics Working Group. Brussels: European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI).
• Baker, W., Czarnocha, B., & Prabhu V. (2004). Procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematics. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Annual Conference, October 2004, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
• Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115-131.
• Barry, M.D.J. and Steele, N.C. (1993). A core curriculum in mathematics for the European engineer: an overview. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 24(2), 223-229.
• Bergsten, C., Engelbrecht, & Kågesten, O. (2015). Conceptual or procedural mathematics for engineering students - views of two qualified engineers from two countries. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(7), 979-990.
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. Theory, research and critique (Revised edition). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Cardella, M. E. (2008). Which mathematics should we teach engineering students? An empirically grounded case for a broad notion of mathematical thinking. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 27(3), 150-159.
• Chappell, K. K. (2006). Effects of concept-based instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and procedural skills. In F. Hitt, G. Harel, & A. Selden (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education. CBMS Issues in Mathematical Education (vol. 13, pp. 27-60). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
• Dowling, P. (2014). Recontextualisation in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 525-529). Dordrecht: Springer Reference.
• Engelbrecht, J., Bergsten, C, & Kågesten, O. (2009). Undergraduate students' preference for procedural to conceptual solutions to mathematical problems. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 927-940.
• Engelbrecht, J., Bergsten, C, & Kågesten, O. (2012). Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: Student conceptions and performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 138-162.
• Flegg, J., Mallet, D., & Lupton, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of the relevance of mathematics in engineering. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 717- 732.
• Gainsburg, J. (2007). The mathematical disposition of structural engineers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 477-506.
• Gainsburg, J. (2015). Engineering Students’ epistemological views on mathematical methods in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 139-166.
• Håstad, M. (1968). Mathematics and engineers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1, 93-97.
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1- 27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., Yusof, Y. M., & Mirzaei, F. (2013). Generic skills in engineering mathematics through blended learning: A mathematical thinking approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(5), 1222–1237.
• Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2003). Mathematics in the university education of engineers. Ove Arup Foundation Report. London: Ove Arup Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.lkl.ac.uk/research/REMIT/Kent-Noss-report-Engineering-Maths.pdf
• Kieran, C. (2013). The false dichotomy in mathematics education between conceptual understanding and procedural skills: an example from algebra. In K. R. Leatham (Ed.), Vital directions for mathematics education research (pp. 153-171). New York, NY: Springer.
• Nguyen, D. Q. (1998). The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 2(1), 65-79.
• Potgieter, M., Malatje, E., Gaigher, E., & Venter, E. (2010). Confidence versus performance as an indicator of the presence of alternative conceptions and inadequate problem‐solving skills in mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1407-1429, doi: 10.1080/09500690903100265
• Radu, M. (2002). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding in mathematics education: The case of fractions and division. A reply to Hung-Hsi Wu. ZDM, 34(3), 93-95.
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R.C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1118-1135). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
• Schneider, M., & Stern, E. (2010). The developmental relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge: A multimethod approach. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 178-192.
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1-36.
• Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404-411.
• Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355-368.
• Winkelman, P. (2009). Perceptions of mathematics in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 305-316.
• Wu, H. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education. American Educator, Fall 1999. Resource document. AFT, A Union of Professionals. www.aft.org/pdfs/americaneducator/fall1999/wu.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014.

APA

Bergsten, C., Engelbrecht, J., & Kågesten, O. (2017). Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum – Comparing Views of Junior and Senior Engineering Students in Two Countries. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 533-553. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00631a

Vancouver

Bergsten C, Engelbrecht J, Kågesten O. Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum – Comparing Views of Junior and Senior Engineering Students in Two Countries. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3):533-53. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00631a

AMA

Bergsten C, Engelbrecht J, Kågesten O. Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum – Comparing Views of Junior and Senior Engineering Students in Two Countries. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3), 533-553. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00631a

Chicago

Bergsten, Christer, Johann Engelbrecht, and Owe Kågesten. "Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum – Comparing Views of Junior and Senior Engineering Students in Two Countries". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 3 (2017): 533-553. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00631a

Harvard

Bergsten, C., Engelbrecht, J., and Kågesten, O. (2017). Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum – Comparing Views of Junior and Senior Engineering Students in Two Countries. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), pp. 533-553. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00631a

MLA

Bergsten, Christer et al. "Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum – Comparing Views of Junior and Senior Engineering Students in Two Countries". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, pp. 533-553. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00631a