Bridging and brokering across communities of practice: A STEM coach’s role in helping teachers access expertise

Michael Giamellaro; Deborah Siegel

doi:10.29333/ejmste/12966

Full Text (PDF)

Michael Giamellaro ¹ ^* , Deborah Siegel ¹

More Detail

¹ Oregon State University-Cascades, Bend, OR, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

STEM education aspires toward integrated and contextualized instruction, both difficult goals for teachers. Expertise from within and outside the school are resources for helping teachers access content knowledge and practices in their classrooms. In this project, a STEM coach supported teachers to integrate and contextualize STEM instruction. Connectivity between teachers, outside experts, and other resources indicated opportunities for curricular integration and contextualization and was measured through social network analysis and analysis of teacher journals and interviews. The coach dramatically increased connectivity in the district through bridging and brokering relationships, maintaining a global vision for the district’s STEM initiative, and navigating interpersonal relationships. Teachers utilized the connectivity to expertise to enhance STEM curriculum. Having a central actor (coach) allowed for rapid and widespread advancement of the STEM initiative.

Keywords

STEM coach
social network analysis
school reform
contextualization
integrated curriculum
community of practice

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 19, Issue 3, March 2023, Article No: em2232

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12966

Publication date: 01 Mar 2023

Online publication date: 17 Feb 2023

Article Views: 1899

Article Downloads: 889

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
Ash, D. (2007). Using video data to capture discontinuous science meaning making in non-school settings. In R. Goldman, R. D. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 207-226). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Atteberry, A., & Bryk, A. S. (2010). Centrality, connection, and commitment: The role of social networks in a school-based literacy initiative. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change. Harvard Education Press.
Avila de Lima, J. (2010). Studies of networks in education: Methods for collecting and managing high-quality data. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 243-258). Harvard Education Press.
Baron, C. (2019). What teachers retain from historic site-based professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(4), 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119841889
Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Borgatti, S. P., & Ofem, B. (2010). Overview: Social network theory and analysis. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 17-29). Harvard Education Press.
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
Brenner, M. E. (2006). Interviewing in educational research. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 357-370). Routledge.
Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2016). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753157-3
Bryk, A. S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009100705
Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631-658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21015
Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203-235. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708321829
Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.008
Coburn, C. E., Choi, L., & Mata, W. S. (2010). “I would go to her because her mind is math”: Network formation in the context of a district-based mathematics reform. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change. Harvard Education Press.
Coburn, C. E., Mata, W. S., & Choi, L. (2013). The embeddedness of teachers’ social networks: Evidence from a study of mathematics reform. Sociology of Education, 86(4), 33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040713501147
Coburn, C. E., Russell, J. L., Kaufman, J. H., & Stein, M. K. (2012). Supporting sustainability: Teachers’ advice networks and ambitious instructional reform. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 137–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/667699
Daly, A. J. (2012). Data, dyads, and dynamics: Exploring data use and social networks in educational improvement. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401103
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
Davidson, S. G., & Hughes, R. (2018). Communities of practice as a framework to explain teachers’ experiences within the community of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1287-1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21452
Drayton, B., & Falk, J. (2006). Dimensions that shape teacher-scientist collaborations for teacher enhancement. Science Education, 90(4), 734-761. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20138
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645-672). SAGE.
Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., Penuel, W. R., Ellefson, N., & Porter, S. (2011). Focus, fiddle, and friends: Experiences that transform knowledge for the implementation of innovations. Sociology of Education, 84(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711401812
Gamse, B. C., Martinez, A., & Bozzi, L. (2016). Calling STEM experts: How can experts contribute to students’ increased STEM engagement? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(1), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1173262
Giamellaro, M., & Siegel, D. R. (2018). Coaching teachers to implement innovations in STEM. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.002
Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context‐based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2019). Teachers’ framing of argumentation goals: Working together to develop individual versus communal understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 821-844. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21530
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00140
Hopkins, M., Spillane, J. P., Jakopovic, P., & Heaton, R. M. (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 114(2), 200-224. https://doi.org/10.1086/671935
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2016). STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753157
Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1990). Do you know whom you were with a week ago Friday? A re-analysis of the Bernard, Killworth, and Sailer studies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786869
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
Kintz, T., Lane, J., Gotwals, A., & Cisterna, D. (2015). Professional development at the local level: Necessary and sufficient conditions for critical colleagueship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.004
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lee, V. R., Leary, H. M., Sellers, L., & Recker, M. (2014). The role of school district science coordinators in the district-wide appropriation of an online resource discovery and sharing tool for teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9465-5
Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher development programs in science. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267
Ma, S., Herman, G. L., Tomkin, J. H., Mestre, J. P., & West, M. (2018). Spreading teaching innovations in social networks: The bridging role of mentors. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1(1-2), 60-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0002-6
Maashi, K. M., Kewalramani, S., & Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2022). Sustainable professional development for STEM teachers in Saudi Arabia. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12597
Maltese, A. V., Melki, C. S., & Wiebke, H. L. (2014). The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM. Science Education, 98(6), 937-962. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21132
Marin, A., & Hampton, K. N. (2007). Simplifying the personal network name generator: Alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods, 19(2), 163-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X06298588
Marshall, S. A., & Buenrostro, P. M. (2021). What makes mathematics teacher coaching effective? A call for a justice-oriented perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(5), 594-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871211019024
Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2012). The effect of content-focused coaching on the quality of classroom text discussions. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111434985
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 709-736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE.
Pil, F. K., & Leana, C. (2009). Applying organizational research to public school reform: The effects of teacher human and social capital on student performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1101-1124. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47084647
Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2017). Factors influencing teachers’ professional development in networked professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.014
Rahm, J., & Moore, J. C. (2016). A case study of long-term engagement and identity-in-practice: Insights into the STEM pathways of four underrepresented youths. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 768-801. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21268
Rakap, S. (2017). Impact of coaching on preservice teachers’ use of embedded instruction in inclusive preschool classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685753
Reiser, B. J., Michaels, S., Moon, J., Bell, T., Dyer, E., Edwards, K. D., McGill, T. A. W., Novak, M., & Park, A. (2017). Scaling up three-dimensional science learning through teacher-led study groups across a state. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 280-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117699598
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
Roth, W.-M., & Eijck, M. V. (2010). Fullness of life as minimal unit: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning across the life span. Science Education, 94(6), 1027-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20401
Roth, W.-M., & Jornet, A. (2013). Situated cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(5), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1242
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
Sailors, M., & Price, L. (2015). Support for the improvement of practices through intensive coaching (SIPIC): A model of coaching for improving reading instruction and reading achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.008
Shein, P. P., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2015). Impact of a scientist–teacher collaborative model on students, teachers, and scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2147-2169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1068465
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
Shukshina, L. V., Gegel, L. A., Erofeeva, M. A., Levina, I. D., Chugaeva, U. Y., & Nikitin, O. D. (2021). STEM and STEAM education in Russian education: Conceptual framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), em2018. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11184
Siegel, D., & Giamellaro, M. (2020). Defining STEM within a school district: A co-constructed and evolving process. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09959-2
Spillane, J. P., Healey, K., & Kim, C. M. (2010). Leading and managing instruction: Formal and informal aspects of the elementary school organization. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 129-158). Harvard Education Press.
Stroupe, D., Caballero, M. D., & White, P. (2018). Fostering students’ epistemic agency through the co-configuration of moth research. Science Education, 102(6), 1176-1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21469
Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383-1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
Varelas, M., House, R., & Wenzel, S. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Education, 89(3), 492-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20047
Vasquez, J. A. (2014). STEM: Beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 10-15.
Vennix, J., den Brok, P., & Taconis, R. (2017). Perceptions of STEM-based outreach learning activities in secondary education. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9217-6
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Whitworth, B. A., Maeng, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (2018). Exploring practices of science coordinators participating in targeted professional development. Science Education, 102(3), 474-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21337
Whitworth, B. A., Maeng, J. L., Wheeler, L. B., & Chiu, J. L. (2017). Investigating the role of a district science coordinator. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(7), 914-936. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21391

How to cite this article

APA

Giamellaro, M., & Siegel, D. (2023). Bridging and brokering across communities of practice: A STEM coach’s role in helping teachers access expertise. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), em2232. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12966

Vancouver

Giamellaro M, Siegel D. Bridging and brokering across communities of practice: A STEM coach’s role in helping teachers access expertise. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(3):em2232. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12966

AMA

Giamellaro M, Siegel D. Bridging and brokering across communities of practice: A STEM coach’s role in helping teachers access expertise. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(3), em2232. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12966

Chicago

Giamellaro, Michael, and Deborah Siegel. "Bridging and brokering across communities of practice: A STEM coach’s role in helping teachers access expertise". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 3 (2023): em2232. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12966

Harvard

Giamellaro, M., and Siegel, D. (2023). Bridging and brokering across communities of practice: A STEM coach’s role in helping teachers access expertise. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), em2232. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12966

MLA

Giamellaro, Michael et al. "Bridging and brokering across communities of practice: A STEM coach’s role in helping teachers access expertise". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 3, 2023, em2232. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12966