Argumentative orchestration in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom

Horacio Solar; Andrés Ortiz; Victoria Arriagada; Jordi Deulofeu

doi:10.29333/ejmste/12245

Full Text (PDF)

Horacio Solar ¹ ^* , Andrés Ortiz ² , Victoria Arriagada ¹ , Jordi Deulofeu ³

More Detail

¹ Faculty of Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, CHILE² Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, CHILE³ Department of Didactics of Mathematics and Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, SPAIN^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Given the importance of modelling in mathematics classrooms, and despite the extensive body of research on teacher support for promoting the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom, authors have overlooked how teacher support for argumentation can contribute to this cycle. This study is aimed at characterizing teacher support for argumentation in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom. We analyzed 10 class episodes taken from the cases of two teachers, Soledad and Ángeles. The episodes were analyzed considering teacher support for argumentative orchestration (communicative strategies and pattern recognition). In the two cases studied, we found that argumentative orchestration exhibited different types of overall presence and recurrence throughout the stages of the mathematical modelling cycle, with communicative strategies being more present across the board and more recurrent in the mathematical modelling cycle than pattern recognition strategies.

Keywords

mathematical modelling cycle
modelling process
collective argumentation
argumentative orchestration
case study

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 18, Issue 8, August 2022, Article No: em2141

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12245

Publication date: 25 Jul 2022

Article Views: 1645

Article Downloads: 909

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Aravena, M. (2016). Modelización matemática en Chile [Mathematical modeling in Chile]. In J. Arrieta, & L. Díaz (Eds.), Investigaciones Latinoamericanas en modelación matemática educative [Latin American research in educational mathematical modeling] (pp. 195-234). Gedisa.
Ayalon, M., & Hershkowitz, R. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.010
Ball, D., Sleep, L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458-474. https://doi.org/10.1086/596996
Beckschulte, C. (2020). Mathematical modelling with a solution plan: An intervention study about the development of grade 9 students’ modelling competencies. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, & C. Lampen (Eds.), Mathematical modelling education and sense-making. International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_12
Blum, W. (1996). Anwendungsbeziige im Mathematikunterricht - Trends und Perspektiven [Applications in mathematics teaching - trends and perspectives]. Schriftenreihe Didaktik der Mathematik, 23, 15-38.
Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo-Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling: ICTMA 14 (pp. 15-30). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_3
Blum, W., & Borromeo-Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58.
Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). Investigating quality mathematics teaching: The DISUM project. In C. Bergsten & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Developing and researching quality in mathematics teaching and learning, proceedings of MADIF5, (pp. 3-16). SMDF.
Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects: State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00302716
Blum, W., & Schukajlow, S. (2018). Selbständiges Lernen mit Modellierungsaufgaben – Untersuchung von Lernumgebungen zum Modellieren im Projekt DISUM [Independent learning with modeling tasks - investigation of learning environments for modeling in the DISUM project]. In S. Schukajlow & W. Blum (Eds.), Evaluierte Lernumgebungen zum Modellieren (pp. 51-72). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20325-2_4
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Pearson Education.
Cai, J., Cirillo, M., Pelesko, J., Borromeo Ferri, R., Borba, M., Geiger, V., Stillman, G. A., English, L., Wake, G., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Mathematical modelling in school education: Mathematical, cognitive, curricular, instructional, and teacher education perspectives. In Proceedings of the 38^th Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 145-172). PME.
Conner, A. M., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Czocher, J. A. (2018). How does validating activity contribute to the modelling process? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(2), 137-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9833-4
de Oliveira, A. M. P., & Barbosa, J. (2013). Mathematical modeling, mathematical content and tensions in discourses. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modeling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 67-76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_5
Guc, F. A., & Kuleyin, H. (2021). Argümantasyon kalitesinin matematiksel modelleme sürecine yansiması [Reflection of argumentation quality on mathematical modeling process]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education], 34(1), 222-262. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.850230
Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. ZDM–International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0095-y
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb, & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics: Assessment for learning in practice. McGraw-Hill Education.
Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM, 38(2), 113-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655885
Maaß, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, & Goss, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM, 51(6), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5
Manouchehri, A., Bekdemir, M., & Yao. X. (2020). Facilitating modelling activities in a grade 5 classroom. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, & C. Lampen (Eds), Mathematical modelling education and sense-making. International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 187-197). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_17
Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers promoting student mathematical reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790339
Petty, N., Thomson, O., & Stew, G. (2012). Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual Therapy, 17(5), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.03.004
Schukajlow, S., Kolter, J., & Blum, W. (2015). Scaffolding mathematical modelling with a solution plan. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1241-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0707-2
Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Solar, H., & Deulofeu, J (2016). Condiciones para promover el desarrollo de la competencia de argumentación en el aula de matemáticas [Conditions to promote the development of argumentative competence in the mathematics classroom]. Bolema - Mathematics Education Bulletin, Rio Claro, 30(56), 1092–1112. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v30n56a13
Solar, H., Ortiz, A., & Ulloa, R. (2016). MED: Modelo de formación continua para profesores de matemática, basada en la experiencia [MED: Model of continuous training for mathematics teachers, based on experience]. Estudios Pedagógicos, 42(4), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000500016
Solar, H., Ortiz, A., Deulofeu, J., & Ulloa, J. (2021). Teacher support for argumentation and the incorporation of contingencies in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(7), 977-1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1733686
Stillman, G. A., Kaiser G., & Lampen, E. (2020). Sense-making in mathematical modelling and applications educational research and practice. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, C. Lampen (Eds), Mathematical modelling education and sense-making. International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_2
Tekin-Dede, A. (2019). Arguments constructed within the mathematical modelling cycle. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 292-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1501825
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Tropper, N., Leiss, D., & Hänze, M. (2015). Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modelling. ZDM, 47(7), 1225-1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11069-7_4
Vorhölter, K. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive group strategies for modelling. ZDM, 51(4), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01055-7
Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00143-8
Yin, R (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.

How to cite this article

APA

Solar, H., Ortiz, A., Arriagada, V., & Deulofeu, J. (2022). Argumentative orchestration in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), em2141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12245

Vancouver

Solar H, Ortiz A, Arriagada V, Deulofeu J. Argumentative orchestration in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(8):em2141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12245

AMA

Solar H, Ortiz A, Arriagada V, Deulofeu J. Argumentative orchestration in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(8), em2141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12245

Chicago

Solar, Horacio, Andrés Ortiz, Victoria Arriagada, and Jordi Deulofeu. "Argumentative orchestration in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 8 (2022): em2141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12245

Harvard

Solar, H., Ortiz, A., Arriagada, V., and Deulofeu, J. (2022). Argumentative orchestration in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), em2141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12245

MLA

Solar, Horacio et al. "Argumentative orchestration in the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 8, 2022, em2141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12245