Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529931.pdf.
• Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2).
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Puro, P., & Mergendoller, J. R. (1992). Translating motivation into thoughtfulness. Redefining student learning: Roots of educational change, 207-239.
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in higher education, 47(1), 1-32.
• Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175.
• Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M. A., & Hartmann, B. (2014). Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system. In Proc. CSCW 2014 (pp. 1176–1187). New York: ACM Press.
• Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 23). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Corno, L., & Rohrkemper, M. (1985). The intrinsic motivation to learn in classrooms. Research on motivation in education, 2, 53-90.
• Fox, A. (2013). From moocs to spocs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38-40.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
• Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105.
• Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., Elms, H., & Lacey, R. (2008). Using QCA in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business unit effects. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 695-726.
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014, March). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41-50). ACM.
• Hu, S., Kuh, G. D., & Li, S. (2008). The effects of engagement in inquiry-oriented activities on student learning and personal development. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 71-81.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systematic view of online learning (3rd Ed.). Belmont, VA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• Oremus, W. (2013). Forget MOOCs. Retrieved from: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/09/spocs_small_private_online_classes_may_be_better_than_moocs.html.
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731.
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
• So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336.
• Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204.
• Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
• Wang, X. H., Wang, J. P., Wen, F. J., Wang, J., & Tao, J. Q. (2016). Exploration and Practice of Blended Teaching Model Based Flipped Classroom and SPOC in Higher University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(10), 99-104.
• Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace • perform • model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495-2503.
• Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). Video-Based Learning: A Critical Analysis of The Research Published in 2003-2013 and Future Visions. eLmL 2014: The sixth international conference on mobile, hybrid, and on-line Learning.
• Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & management, 43(1), 15-27.
• Zhao, C. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in higher education, 45(2), 115-138.

APA

Lin, Y.-S., Chen, S.-Y., Su, Y.-S., & Lai, C.-F. (2018). Analysis of Students’ Learning Satisfaction in a Social Community Supported Computer Principles and Practice Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 849-858. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81058

Vancouver

Lin YS, Chen SY, Su YS, Lai CF. Analysis of Students’ Learning Satisfaction in a Social Community Supported Computer Principles and Practice Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(3):849-58. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81058

AMA

Lin YS, Chen SY, Su YS, Lai CF. Analysis of Students’ Learning Satisfaction in a Social Community Supported Computer Principles and Practice Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(3), 849-858. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81058

Chicago

Lin, Yu-Shan, Shih-Yeh Chen, Yu-Sheng Su, and Chin-Feng Lai. "Analysis of Students’ Learning Satisfaction in a Social Community Supported Computer Principles and Practice Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 3 (2018): 849-858. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81058

Harvard

Lin, Y.-S., Chen, S.-Y., Su, Y.-S., and Lai, C.-F. (2018). Analysis of Students’ Learning Satisfaction in a Social Community Supported Computer Principles and Practice Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), pp. 849-858. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81058

MLA

Lin, Yu-Shan et al. "Analysis of Students’ Learning Satisfaction in a Social Community Supported Computer Principles and Practice Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 3, 2018, pp. 849-858. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81058