Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations, in Staw, B. M. & Cummings (Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 123-167. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995.
• Ay, N., & Sung, Y. (2010). Aesthetic Economy Slows Taiwan ‘s Small and Medium - sized Enterprises to Construct Soft Power. Journal for SME Development, 16, 209-222.
• Bandura, A. (1989). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
• Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_3.
• Calantone, R. J., & Stanko, M. A. (2007). Drivers of Outsourced Innovation: An Exploratory Study. Product Development & Management Association, 24, 230-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00247.x.
• Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006.
• Chen, K. Y., & Wang, C. H. (2010). Statistical Analysis Practice: Application of SPSS & AMOS. Taipei: Wunan Press.
• Chen, L. A. (2005). Creative Thinking Strategies & Skills. Bulletin of Educational Resources and Research, 30, 201-221.
• Chen, S. Z., & Huang, W. Z. (2006). The Art of Innovative Design. Taipei: Longxi International Book, 13-18.
• Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R & D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x.
• Chiou, H. (2012). Application of fuzzy composite score for scoring situational judgment tests: A integrated operation viewpoint. Quantitative Modelling in Marketing and Management. USA: World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814407724_0013.
• Chiu, S. P. (2014). A Study of Students’ Core Competencies and Competitive Advantage from Design Colleges (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
• Cohen, M. (1995). When People Get Out of the Box: New Relationships, New Systems, In Howard A (Ed.), the changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 365-410.
• Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., & Leibling, M. (Eds.). (2001). Creativity in education. A&C Black.
• Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, 76(6), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.40619980906.
• Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
• Hagel, J., & Brown. J. S. (2005). The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends on Productive Friction and Dynamic Specialization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2009.12.014.
• Hong, P., Nahm, A. Y., & Doll, W. J. (2004). The Role of Project Target Clarity in An Uncertain Project Environment. International Journal of Operations and Preduction Management, 24(12), 1269-1291. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410569047.
• Hsiao, W. J., & Lai, R. Y. (2010). The Impact of Social Skills and Team Context on Knowledge-flows. International Journal of Commerce and Stratege, 2(2), 109-123.
• Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F., (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978.
• Hung, S. Y., Chen, H. G., & Yeh, P. (2006). Effectiveness of the Creativity Support Systems: An Empirical Test of the Self-Efficacy Theory. Journal of Information Management, 13(4), 1-26.
• Hwang, F. M. (2015). Structural Equation Modeling (5th ed.). Taipei: Wunan Press.
• Janssen, O. (2003), Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647210.
• Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships. Educational studies, 30(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750.
• Kerr, B., & Gagliardi, C. (2003). Measuring creativity in research and practice. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.) Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures. Washington D.C: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-010.
• Kimble, C., Grenier, C., & Goglio-Primard, K. (2010). Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.002.
• Kodama, M. (2007). Innovation through Boundary Management - A Case Study in Reforms at Matsushita Electric. Technovation, 27, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.006.
• Kodama, M. (2009). Boundaries Innovation and Knowledge Integration in the Japanese Firm. Long Range Planning, 42(4), 463-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.001.
• Luh, D. B., & Lu, C. C. (2012). Co-competition based Recruitment Approach. Journal of Design, 17(1), 1-24.
• Morgeson, F. P., Reider, M. H., & Campionk, M. A. (2005). Selecting Individuals in Team Settings: the Importance of Social Skills, Personality Characteristics, and Teamwork Knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 583-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.655.x.
• Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior, 14/E. Pearson Education India.
• Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., & Hagerty, B. M. K. (1986). Responsive professional education: Balancing outcomes and opportunities. Washington, DC: ASHE.
• Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. (2003). Integrating Knowledge Through Information Trading: Examining the Relationship Between Boundary Spanning Communication and Individual Performance. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 261-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02341.
• Tien, C. T., & Lu, T. Y. (2005). The relationships of psychological contract and innovative behaviors: Cognitive style as a moderator. Paper presented at the 2005 Health Management Conference, Taiwan.
• Tjosvold, D. (1988). Cooperative and competitive dynamics within and between organizational units. Human Relations, 41(6), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678804100601.
• Wang, L. Y., Chang, C. N., & Chiang, S. C. (2014, Sep). Network-based Recommendation Game for Increasing the Response Rate of Web Survey on Higher Education. Paper presented at the 2013 European Conference on Educational Research, Porto, Portugal.
• Wen, L. Y., & Chen, M. H. (2008). A Study of the Influence on Organizational Innovation Climate and Employee Engagement to individual Innovative Behavior. Paper presented at the 2016 Health Management Conference, Taiwan.
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Psychographics and creativity. Journal of Advertising, 2(March), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1973.10672482.
• Wu, M. C., Chang, W. L., & Chen, C. C. (2012). Retrospect and Prospect of Design Education in Taiwan. Taiwan Education Review, 674, 77-80.
• Yu, M. N. (2006). Latent Variable Models: The Application of SIMPLIS. Taipei: H-EDU Press.

APA

Hsiao, W.-T., Wu, M.-C., Lee, C.-F., & Chang, W.-L. (2019). An Analytic Study on Constructional Relationship of Intrapersonal Factors Fostering Innovation Competency: From Taiwanese Students’ Perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1780. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110486

Vancouver

Hsiao WT, Wu MC, Lee CF, Chang WL. An Analytic Study on Constructional Relationship of Intrapersonal Factors Fostering Innovation Competency: From Taiwanese Students’ Perspectives. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(12):em1780. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110486

AMA

Hsiao WT, Wu MC, Lee CF, Chang WL. An Analytic Study on Constructional Relationship of Intrapersonal Factors Fostering Innovation Competency: From Taiwanese Students’ Perspectives. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(12), em1780. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110486

Chicago

Hsiao, Wei-Ting, Ming-Chang Wu, Chang-Franw Lee, and Wen-Lung Chang. "An Analytic Study on Constructional Relationship of Intrapersonal Factors Fostering Innovation Competency: From Taiwanese Students’ Perspectives". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 12 (2019): em1780. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110486

Harvard

Hsiao, W.-T., Wu, M.-C., Lee, C.-F., and Chang, W.-L. (2019). An Analytic Study on Constructional Relationship of Intrapersonal Factors Fostering Innovation Competency: From Taiwanese Students’ Perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1780. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110486

MLA

Hsiao, Wei-Ting et al. "An Analytic Study on Constructional Relationship of Intrapersonal Factors Fostering Innovation Competency: From Taiwanese Students’ Perspectives". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 12, 2019, em1780. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110486