Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Ahn, S. J., Johnsen, K., & Ball, C. (2019). Points-based reward systems in gamification impact children’s physical activity strategies and psychological needs. Health Education and Behavior, 46(3), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118818241
• Bachman, C. M., & Stewart, C. (2011). Self-Determination Theory and Web-Enhanced Course Template Development. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411798
• Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers and Education, 94, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010
• Bayanova, A. R., Sivova, I. V., Kamasheva, Y. L., Popova, O. V., Semyanov, E. V., Shagieva, R. V., & Yusupov, I. M. (2020). Student online services consumption: Routine practices or mistrust to digital service? Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), 47-54.
• Betoret, F. D., & Artiga, A. G. (2011). The relationship among student basic need satisfaction, approaches to learning, reporting of avoidance strategies and achievement. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(2), 463-496. http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/english/ContadorArticulo.php?597
• Boukhanov, G. V., Vrublevskiy, A. S., Kosolapova, N. V., & Martynova, E. V. (2019). Project activity as а technology implementation of the competence-based approach in modern educational process. Vestnik NCBŽD, 1(39), 26-32.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Buhr, E. E., Daniels, L. M., & Goegan, L. D. (2019). Cognitive appraisals mediate relationships between two basic psychological needs and emotions in a massive open online course. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.009
• Chen, K.-C., & Jang, S.-J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 741-752 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011
• Cincinnato, S. Zhu, C., & De Wever, B. (2015). Teacher and institutional characteristics affecting teaching practices in OBL: A self-determination approach. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL, 790-793. http://www.iwt-alo.be/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Teacher-and-Institutional-Characteristics-Affecting-Teaching.pdf
• Danowitz, A. (2016). Leveraging the final project to improve student motivation in introductory digital design courses. Proceedings - 46th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2016, Bayfront Convention CenterErie. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757380
• De Araujo Guerra Grangeia, T., De Jorge, B., Franci, D., Santos, T. M., Setubal, M. S. V., Schweller, M., & De Carvalho-Filho, M. A. (2016). Cognitive load and self-determination theories applied to e-learning: Impact on students’ participation and academic performance. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0152462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152462
• De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130
• Escobar Fandiño, F. G., Muñoz, L. D., & Silva Velandia, A. J. (2019). Motivation and e-learning English as a foreign language: A qualitative study. Heliyon, 5(9), e02394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02394
• Fang, J., Tang, L., Yang, J., & Peng, M. (2019). Social interaction in MOOCs: The mediating effects of immersive experience and psychological needs satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 39, 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.006
• Faye, C., & Sharpe, D. (2008). Academic motivation in university: The role of basic psychological needs and identity formation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40(4), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012858
• Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. Sage Publications. https://books.google.ru/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=HBvNB938euEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&ots=dctJyv1idq&sig=dL05NxufQpt8hJkIEz4tWhKp_-0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
• Irtuganova, E.A. (2018). Problems of psychological safety of the educational environment for students with health limitations. Vestnik NCBŽD, 1(35), 36-41.
• Jeno, L. M., Grytnes, J.-A., & Vandvik, V. (2017). The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students’ motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Computers and Education, 107, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.011
• Karatas, K., & Arpaci, I. (2021). The Role of Self-directed Learning, Metacognition, and 21st Century Skills Predicting the Readiness for Online Learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep300. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10786
• Karkina, S. V., Mena Marcos, J. J., & Valeeva, R. A. (2021). Improvement of art creative skills by the means of signature pedagogy in online musical education. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1344, 86-99.
• Karkina, S.V., Mena, J., & Valeeva, R.A. (2020). Design of online course based on SPOC as a signature pedagogy in music teacher education. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 3436576, 870-876.
• Ke, W., & Zhang, P. (2010). The effects of extrinsic motivations and satisfaction in open source software development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(12), 784-808. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00251
• Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCS): A research review, 2009-2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 1-16. http://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v13/n1/1.html
• Khairullina, L. I., Tuchkova, O. A., & Krylatyh, I. S. (2021). Occupational risk assessment: recommendation or obligation to the employer. Vestnik NTSBGD, 2(48), 149-158.
• Kramer, I. M., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2017). Science-writing in the blogosphere as a tool to promote autonomous motivation in education. Internet and Higher Education, 35, 48-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.08.001
• Leontiev, A. N. (1977). Deyatelnost. Soznaniye. Lichnost. Politizdat. http://www.psychmsu.ru/library_files/Deyatelnost_soznanie_lichnost_Leontev.pdf
• Leontiev, D. A. (2016). Potrebnosti. motivy i emotsii. Ponimaniye motiva v trudakh A. N. Leontyeva i S. L. Rubinshteyna. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, 2. https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2016.02.03
• Levina, I. D., Ukolova, L. I., Lavrentyeva, E. Y., Akhilgova, M. T., Zharikov, Y. S., Popova, O. V., Semyanov, E. V., Malanov, I. A., Muskhanova, I. V., Magomeddibirova, Z. A., & Bazaeva, F. U., Isaeva M. A. (2019). Nursing home conditions for elderly people and its peculiarities of their adaptation. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 13(2), 1549-1555.
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
• Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P. A., Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Adult MOOC learners as self-directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning Journal, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.889
• Lynch M. F., Salikhova N. R., & Eremeeva A. V. (2020). Basic needs in other cultures: Using qualitative methods to study key issues in self-determination theory research. Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 17(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-1-134-144
• Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, N. R. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions about the child’s developmental needs: A structural analysis. Mathematics Education, 11, 1471-1479.
• Martin, N. I., Kelly, N., & Terry, P. C. (2018). A framework for self-determination in massive open online courses: Design for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3722
• Meda, L., & ElSayary, A. (2021). Establishing social, cognitive and teacher presences during emergency remote teaching: Reflections of certified online instructors in the United Arab Emirates. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4), ep318. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11073
• Meet, R. K., & Kala, D. (2021). Trends and future prospects in MOOC researches: A systematic literature review 2013–2020. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep312. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10986
• Min, H., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2020). Self-regulated learning in a massive open online course: A review of literature. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1(2), e02007. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/8403
• Minakhmetova, A. Z., Skutelnik, O. A., Fedorchuk, Y. M., Shulga, T. I., Pavlushin, A. A., & Shagiev, B. V. (2017). Motivational and valuable orientation of teachers as a condition to form students’ tolerant behavior. Man in India, 97(3), 323-332.
• Mushtonina, E. A., Alexandrova, A. V., & Levchuk, A. A. (2021). Ensuring labor safety based on the formation of corporate informal leadership program. Vestnik NTSBGD, 1(47), 141-150.
• Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
• Orekhovskaya, N. A., Chistyakov, A. A., Kryukova, N. I., Krokhina, J. A., Ospennikov, Y. V., & Makarova, E. V. (2019). Orthodoxy and modernity their contact facets in Russian society. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(2), 67-77.
• Pedrotti, M., & Nistor, N. (2016). User motivation and technology acceptance in online learning environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 11th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2016 (pp. 472-477). Lyon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_45
• Razumovskaya, M. I., Larionova, A. A., Zaitseva, N. A., Petrina, O. A, Vinogradova, M. V., Nagay, N. G., & Takhumova, O. V. (2019). Models of Integrated Interactions Organization in the Field of Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(4), 576-580.
• Rubio, G. L., Leskova, A., Prokopyev, A. I., Miroshkin, D. V., & Kamneva, E. V. (2020). Despair or the loss of selfhood in Kierkegaard’s sickness unto death. XLinguae, 13(3), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2020.13.03.07
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications. https://www.guilford.com/books/Self-Determination-Theory/Ryan-Deci/9781462538966
• Salame, I. I., & Hanna, E. (2020). Studying the impact of online homework on the perceptions, attitudes, study habits, and learning experiences of chemistry students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(4), e2221. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8543
• Salikhova N. R., Lynch M. F., & Salikhova A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep280. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584
• Slobodchikov, V. I. (1994). Development of subjective reality in ontogenesis (Doctoral dissertation). Moscow.
• Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001
• Starcic, A. I., Huang, P.-S., Valeeva, R. A., Latypova, L. A., & Huang, Y.-M. (2017). Digital storytelling and mobile learning: Potentials for internationalization of higher education curriculum. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10676 LNCS, 400-406.
• Suleri, J. I., & Suleri, A. J. (2019). Comparing virtual learning, classical classroom learning and blended learning. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 3(1), em0072. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejosdr/3970
• Sun, Y., Ni, L., Zhao, Y., Shen, X.-L., & Wang, N. (2019). Understanding students’ engagement in MOOCs: An integration of self-determination theory and theory of relationship quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3156-3174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12724
• Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143
• Tugun, V., Bayanova, A. R., Erdyneeva, K. G., Mashkin N. A., Sakhipova, Z. M., & Zasova, L. V. (2020). The opinions of technology supported education of university students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(23), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i23.18779
• Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Tondeur, J., Phillipsen, B., & Lombaerts, K. (2016). Adult learners’ motivation to participate and perception of online and blended environments. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, 14th European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL 2015 (pp. 750-757). University of Hertfordshire Hatfield.
• Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(2), 198-221. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1984). Collected works. Pedagogika.
• Yang, S., Zhou, S., & Cheng, X. (2019). Why do college students continue to use mobile learning? Learning involvement and self-determination theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 626-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12634
• Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers and Education, 92-93, 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012

APA

Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2021). Adult Learners’ Responses to Online Learning: A Qualitative Analysis Grounded in Self-determination Theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), em2011. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11176

Vancouver

Salikhova NR, Lynch MF, Salikhova AB. Adult Learners’ Responses to Online Learning: A Qualitative Analysis Grounded in Self-determination Theory. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(10):em2011. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11176

AMA

Salikhova NR, Lynch MF, Salikhova AB. Adult Learners’ Responses to Online Learning: A Qualitative Analysis Grounded in Self-determination Theory. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(10), em2011. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11176

Chicago

Salikhova, Nailya R., Martin F. Lynch, and Albina B. Salikhova. "Adult Learners’ Responses to Online Learning: A Qualitative Analysis Grounded in Self-determination Theory". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 10 (2021): em2011. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11176

Harvard

Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., and Salikhova, A. B. (2021). Adult Learners’ Responses to Online Learning: A Qualitative Analysis Grounded in Self-determination Theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), em2011. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11176

MLA

Salikhova, Nailya R. et al. "Adult Learners’ Responses to Online Learning: A Qualitative Analysis Grounded in Self-determination Theory". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 10, 2021, em2011. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11176