Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Oxford University Press.
• Albion, P. R., & Spence, K. G. (2013). Primary connections in a provincial Queensland school system: Relationships to science teaching self-efficacy and practices. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(3), 501-520.
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-0900
• Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Teachers’ sense of efficacy, classroom behavior, and student achievement. In P. T. Ashton, & R. B. Webb (Eds.), Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement (pp. 125-144). Longman.
• Ashton, P. T., Buhr, D., & Crocker, L. (1984). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: A self- or norm-referenced construct? Florida Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 29-41.
• Ashton, P. T., Olejnik, S., Crocker, L., & McAuliffe, M. (1982, April). Measurement problems in the study of teachers’ sense of efficacy [Paper presentation]. The 1982 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association., New York.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 national survey of science and mathematics education+. Horizon Research, Inc. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://horizon-research.com/NSSME/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Report_of_the_2018_NSSME.pdf
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research, Inc. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541798
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), Article 238. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
• Bleicher, R. E. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI‐B: Measuring self‐efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18004.x
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Psychology Press.
• Boone, W., & Rogan, J. (2005). Rigour in quantitative analysis: The promise of Rasch analysis techniques. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2005.10740574
• Boz, Y., & Cetin-Dindar, A. (2021). Teaching concerns, self-efficacy beliefs and constructivist learning environment of pre-service science teachers: A modelling study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 274-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919079
• Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction, 66, Article 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302
• Calkins, L., Wiens, P., Parker, J., & Tschinkel, R. (2023). Teacher motivation and self-efficacy: How do specific motivations for entering teaching relate to teacher self-efficacy? Journal of Education, 204(2), 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574221142300
• Coladarci, T., & Fink, D. R. (1995, April). Correlations among measures of teacher efficacy: Are they measuring the same thing? [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
• Coladarci, T., & Fink, D. R. (1995). Correlations among measures of teacher efficacy: Are they measuring the same thing? In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.1.98
• DataUSA. (2024). Elementary & middle school teachers. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://datausa.io/profile/soc/elementary-middle-school-teachers
• Demir, S. (2020). The role of self-efficacy in job satisfaction, organizational commitment, motivation and job involvement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.85.10
• Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., Perera, S., & Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americas Investigators. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 950-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item response theory. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605269
• Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
• Enochs, L. G., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17256.x
• Fisher, W. P. (1994). The Rasch debate: Validity and revolution in educational measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 36-72). Ablex.
• Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.76.4.569
• Guskey, T. R. (1981). Measurement of the responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718103200310
• Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003627
• Hammack, R., & Ivey, T. (2017a). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of engineering and engineering design. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 3(1/2), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2017.29
• Hammack, R., & Ivey, T. (2017b). Examining elementary teachers’ engineering self‐efficacy and engineering teacher efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12205
• Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, College Station, TX.
• Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teachers’ views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), Article 5.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Huang, S., Yin, H., & Lv, L. (2019). Job characteristics and teacher well-being: The mediation of teacher self-monitoring and teacher self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 39(3), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1543855
• Hynes, M. M., Mathis, C., Purzer, S., Rynearson, A., & Siverling, E. (2017). Systematic review of research in P-12 engineering education from 2000-2015. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 453-462.
• Hyrkäs, K., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., & Oksa, L. (2003). Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(6), 619-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00036-1
• Kang, E. J., Donovan, C., & McCarthy, M. J. (2018). Exploring elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and confidence in implementing the NGSS science and engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2017.1415616
• Karpudewan, M., Krishnan, P., Roth, W. M., & Ali, M. N. (2023). What research says about the relationships between Malaysian teachers’ knowledge, perceived difficulties and self-efficacy, and practicing STEM teaching in schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(3), 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00658-1
• Kaya, E., Deniz, H., & Yesilyurt, E. (2023). Toward developing a valid and reliable assessment of adults’ nature of engineering views. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(3), 634-673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20524
• Kaya, E., Newley, A., Deniz, H., Yesilyurt, E., & Newley, P. (2017). Introducing engineering design to a science teaching methods course through educational robotics and exploring changes in views of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(2), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_047_02_66
• Kaya, E., Newley, A., Yesilyurt, E., & Deniz, H. (2020). Measuring computational thinking teaching efficacy beliefs of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(6), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231x.2020.12290665
• Kaya, E., Yesilyurt, E., Newley, A., & Deniz, H. (2019). Examining the impact of a computational thinking intervention on pre-service elementary science teachers’ computational thinking teaching efficacy beliefs, interest and confidence. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 38(4), 385-392. Retrieved July 16, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210970
• Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
• Kuvac, M., & Koc, I. (2022). Enhancing preservice science teachers’ perceptions of engineer and engineering through STEM education: A focus on drawings as evidence. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1539-1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2052038
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), Article 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
• Lazarides, R., Buchholz, J., & Rubach, C. (2018). Teacher enthusiasm and self-efficacy, student-perceived mastery goal orientation, and student motivation in mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.017
• Linacre, J. M. (2024a). A user’s guide to Winsteps ministeps Rasch-model computer programs. Retrieved July, 16, 2024, from https://www.winsteps.com/winman/copyright.htm
• Linacre, J. M. (2024b). Sample size and item calibration (or person measure) stability. Institute for Objective Measurement. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt74m.htm
• Livers, S. D., Zelkowski, J., Harbour, K. E., McDaniel, S. C., & Gleason, J. (2019). An examination of the relationships of mathematics self-efficacy and teaching practices among elementary, secondary, and special education educators. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 12(2), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1670891
• Lucero, M., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs and self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1407-1423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.704430
• Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
• Ma, K., Luo, J., Cavanagh, M., Dong, J., & Sun, M. (2023). Measuring teacher self-efficacy: Validating a new comprehensive scale among Chinese pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063830
• Mallinson, T., Stelmack, J., & Velozo, C. (2004). A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient α in the creation of minimum item sets. Medical Care, 42(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000103522.78233.c3
• Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.81.2.247
• Mojavezi, A., & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 483-491. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.483-491
• NASEM. (2020). Building capacity for teaching engineering in K-12 education. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25612
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
• Nie, Y., Tan, G. H., Liau, A. K., Lau, S., & Chua, B. L. (2012). The roles of teacher efficacy in instructional innovation: Its predictive relations to constructivist and didactic instruction. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-012-9128-y
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
• Perera, H. N., & John, J. E. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for teaching math: Relations with teacher and student outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101842
• Pleasants, J., & Olson, J. K. (2019). What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K-12 education. Science Education, 103(1), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21483
• Purzer, Ş., Quintana‐Cifuentes, J., & Menekse, M. (2022). The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding pre-college engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20441
• Rasch, G. (1993). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. MESA Press.
• Ritter, J. M., Boone, W. J., & Rubba, P. A. (2001). Development of an instrument to assess prospective elementary teacher self-efficacy beliefs about equitable science teaching and learning (SEBEST). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016747713585
• Rose, J. S., & Medway, F. J. (1981). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1981.10885308
• Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., Gadalla, T., & Hannay, L. (1999). Administrative assignment of teachers in restructuring secondary schools: The effect of out-of-field course responsibility on teacher efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 782-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131619921968824
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
• Rubeck, M. E., & Enochs, E. G. (1991). A path analytical model of variables that influence science and chemistry teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in middle school science teachers [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Fontana, WI.
• Savran, A., & Çakiroglu, J. (2003). Differences between elementary and secondary preservice science teachers’ perceived efficacy beliefs and their classroom management beliefs. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), 15-20.
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338
• Sehgal, P., Nambudiri, R., & Mishra, S. K. (2017). Teacher effectiveness through self-efficacy, collaboration and principal leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(4), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-05-2016-0090
• Shahzad, K., & Naureen, S. (2017). Impact of teacher self-efficacy on secondary school students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1050
• Sia, A. P. (1992). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceived efficacy in teaching environmental education: A preliminary study [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the North American Association for Environmental Education, Toronto.
• Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1993). Teacher efficacy and student problem as factors in special education referral. The Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699302700105
• Temiz, T., & Topcu, M. S. (2013). Preservice teachers’ teacher efficacy beliefs and constructivist-based teaching practice. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1435-1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0174-5
• Trygstad, P. J., Malzahn, K. A., Banilower, E. R., Plumley, C. L., & Bruce, A. D. (2020). Are all students getting equal access to high-quality science education? Data from the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://horizon-research.com/NSSME/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Equity_Science_FINAL.pdf
• Trygstad, P. J., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Nelson, M. M. (2013). The status of elementary science education: Are we ready for the next generation science standards? Horizon Research, Inc.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1
• Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
• Unfried, A., Rachmatullah, A., Alexander, A. & Wiebe, E. (2022). An alternative to STEBI-A: Validation of the T-STEM science scale. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00339-x
• van Uden, J. M., Ritzen, H., & Pieters, J. M. (2014). Engaging students: The role of teacher beliefs and interpersonal teacher behavior in fostering student engagement in vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.08.005
• Wright, B. D. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). The Rasch model as a foundation for the Lexile framework. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://metametricsinc.com/research-publications/rasch-model-foundation-lexile-framework/
• Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA Press.
• Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
• Xie, Z., Gadepalli, C., & Cheetham, B. (2018). A study of chance-corrected agreement coefficients for the measurement of multi-rater consistency. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science & Technology, 19(2), 10.1-10.9. https://doi.org/10.5013/ijssst.a.19.02.10
• Yesilyurt, E., Deniz, H., & Kaya, E. (2021). Exploring sources of engineering teaching self-efficacy for pre-service elementary teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00299-8
• Yoon Yoon, S., Evans, M. G., & Strobel, J. (2014). Validation of the teaching engineering self‐efficacy scale for K‐12 teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 463-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20049
• Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

APA

Yesilyurt, E., Kaya, E., & Deniz, H. (2024). Adapting the science teaching efficacy beliefs instrument to assess engineering teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers: Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), em2487. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14882

Vancouver

Yesilyurt E, Kaya E, Deniz H. Adapting the science teaching efficacy beliefs instrument to assess engineering teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers: Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(8):em2487. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14882

AMA

Yesilyurt E, Kaya E, Deniz H. Adapting the science teaching efficacy beliefs instrument to assess engineering teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers: Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(8), em2487. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14882

Chicago

Yesilyurt, Ezgi, Erdogan Kaya, and Hasan Deniz. "Adapting the science teaching efficacy beliefs instrument to assess engineering teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers: Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 8 (2024): em2487. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14882

Harvard

Yesilyurt, E., Kaya, E., and Deniz, H. (2024). Adapting the science teaching efficacy beliefs instrument to assess engineering teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers: Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), em2487. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14882

MLA

Yesilyurt, Ezgi et al. "Adapting the science teaching efficacy beliefs instrument to assess engineering teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers: Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 8, 2024, em2487. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14882